Tue, 25 November 2008 ![]() I've been on a John C. Reilly kick lately, and this past week I sat down and watched the flick The Promotion (written and directed by Steve Conrad.) I wasn't expecting to really connect with the film at all as it's sort of set up with a pretty standard comedy plot and stars Seann William Scott (he of Stiffler fame from the American Pie movies) who I'm not all that enamored with. Honestly, I was expecting to enjoy Reilly's performance, a few jokes here and there and that's about it. ![]() Part my initial disinterest was that the flick seemed to be drawing from the same cultural ennui of flicks like Waiting, Office Space and more importantly Clerks. I experienced Clerks at the perfect age, 19, right smack dab in the middle of my initial career as a grocery store stock clerk and budding film buff, and connected with it in a very visceral way. For my money Kevin Smith totally captured what life was life like for a 20-something pop culture nerd working in retail, whittling away the hours with humor as the world (customers, supervisors, family, etc.) slowly sucked away at your soul. Well, with a lot of genres (sub-genres, sub-categories, what-have-you) it seems like there are one or two films that do a great job of addressing the particular subject matter, and thereafter other flicks just seem to be watered down imitations or parodies. For me, in the minimum wage lackey category of comedy films, Clerks stands head and shoulders above the rest (with a nice honorable mention to Office Space, even though it deals more with corporate misery), and after watching flicks like Waiting or Kill the Man I was getting kind of tired of the genre. When I saw the trailer for the Promotion, I was expecting just more of the same. Actually, I think part of my disinterest lies simply with the fact that I've moved on from that time and place in my life. I'm over ten years older, working a slightly more rewarding office job (I still emotionally connect to Office Space just fine thank you), and I'm less interested in wallowing in sarcastic hopelessness, preferring a bit more upbeat fare (in general, not as a rule.) Again, watching the trailer for the Promotion, which revolves around two grocery store assistant managers vying for the coveted store manager position at a new location, I was expecting to be less than engaged by the plot. For the first half of the film everything was going exactly as I figured. I was really enjoying John C. Reilly's Richard Wehlner, there were a couple of really funny jokes (in particular a handful about an annoying banjo teacher/gay dominatrix type), and a few surprising cameos (in particular by Jason Bateman and Bobby Cannavale.) I was actually a little surprised that Seann William Scott didn't bug me all that much (something I also noticed in the flick Southland Tales), though there wasn't anything particularly engaging about him either. Then, as the rivalry between Reilly and Scott started to heat up a bit I found myself wanting the film to side-step the clichéd plot (where one of the two would take on the role of the villain and you’d start rooting for the other by proxy) and veer into more uncharted territory. The weird thing is that it did. I as mentioned before, the film stars Scott as Doug Stauber, who is an assistant manager at a grocery store chain located in Chicago, and along with his wife (played by Jenna Fischer) is just trying to make a go of life in middle class America. Figuring on being the shoo-in for the Store Manager position at a new location under construction, the couple decides to take a chance on buying their first house. At the same time, Canadian transplant Richard Wehlner (Reilly) (and his family, including his Scottish wife played by Lili Taylor), also an assistant manager (though for a chain of Canadian sister stores), and a recovering drug addict, transfers to Chicago putting Stauber's "shoo-in" status in jeopardy. As the bigwigs descend on the store to check up on Doug and Richard, each end up dealing with their own demons, be it a gang making life on parking lot duty hell, the possibility of slipping back into depression, alcohol and drugs, or their need to get 'promoted' in order to grab a hold on their life. Though the film is mainly a comedy, it manages to avoid some of the more obvious or gratuitous plot machinations, and pretty much plays the jokes in a subtle manner (even the more outrageous humor isn't in your face.) The flick manages to balance the gags with plenty of introspection and does a surprisingly amazing job at illustrating a more real-life struggle for success. This is what kills me about most movies where the characters are always shooting for the stars, where success is defined only by achieving what in the long run only a very few people can. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for striving for greatness, but I'm also content in not shooting myself into the cosmos. Becoming an amazing success is wonderful, unless the trip there and beyond is horrible. Anyway, about halfway into the film I started hoping for a particular outcome, and was surprised when it occurred. Where Clerks deals with the grind of working a Middle American job with sarcasm, apathy and slack, The Promotion deals in hope, duty, and a positive work ethic. It's the other side of the coin, and sort of the next logical step after a film like Clerks (which is sort of where Smith was going with Clerks II, just without the goofy dance sequences, inexcusably ignorant fanboys, and donkey sex.) Category: Buried in DVDs -- posted at: 2:54 PM Comments[3] |
Thu, 20 November 2008 Just found out that another one of my favorite TV Shows is finally coming to DVD, the awesome (in my opinion) Tales From the Darkside! ![]() Though I missed out on shows like the Twilight Zone, Night Gallery, and the original Alfred Hitchcock Presents (for the most part), I was weaned on horror though episodes of Tales From the Darkside, as well as other similar anthology shows like Monsters and Freddy's Nightmares. In fact one of my favorite guilty pleasure movies is the Tales From the Darkside flick starring Debbie Harry, Buster Poindexter, Christian Slater, and Steve Buscemi. I'm so excited to finally get a chance to relive the experience of watching this great series again. The best part is that the release looks to be priced rather cheaply at around $30 a season. I can't wait for February 10th to get here! Category: 80's TV -- posted at: 3:12 PM Comments[2] |
Tue, 18 November 2008 During this past Halloween season the wife and I were browsing around some of the outlet stores in North Georgia and I had another one of those lightening strike nostalgic moments while in an antique shop. Sitting on top of a stack of old records was a copy of Scooby Doo and the Mystery of the Rider Without a Head record and storybook issued by Peter Pan records back in 1977. I've mentioned this feeling before, but it's my favorite sort of nostalgia moment, the kind when I can't believe I forget whatever it is that made me slap myself upside the head with disbelief. There are plenty of these bits of pop culture flotsam and jetsam that I come across that will put a smile on my face or make me stop for a second and say "Huh", but it's really a great an rare feeling when I feel like a part of me has been lost and is there sitting in front of me again. This particular book must have been a hand-me-down from my sister as I was born the same year it was released and probably wouldn't have used or appreciated it until I was five or six. I'm also not sure how often I actually listened to the record as I didn't recall much when I listened to it recently… (You can listen to the record at the great read-along site, the Secret Cavern of Read-Along Treasures.) What really grabbed me when I found this in the antique shop, and what I really remember pouring over as a kid is the interior artwork. Unfortunately the artist on this particular book wasn't credited, and I have a feeling it's because it was more of a quickie in-house art department rush job as opposed to shopping the work out to freelance talent. Honestly, looking back at this stuff so many years later I have to say that I'm a bit underwhelmed at the quality. Actually it's pretty sloppy in a lot of places, smacking of a bad tracing job. The line work is very stiff with almost no grace or variance to the line width and weight, but even for all of this, I still love it. It makes me feel like I'm six years old again… My favorite bit in the book is the Rider Without a Head, not only because of the monster-esque subject matter, but because the character is rendered with the most detail and attention throughout. In fact, the stiff art style paired with the watercolor in the book reminded me of the work of one of my favorite artists, Quinton Hoover. When I started playing the Magic: the Gathering collectable card game back in the mid 90s, Hoover artwork was the one that really stood out and spoke to me. I'm a big fan of the exacting lines and the colored pencil & watercolor work in the color. It's the essence of comic book art, minus the thick black shadowing. There's something in this type of clean line work that makes me think of cartoons or the type of simple effective illustration used in product packaging. Even though the artwork in the Scooby Doo book isn't nearly as elegant as Quniton Hoover's work (example of which you can see here and here), it makes me wonder if spending hours pouring over the book helped to predispose me to enjoying this sort of clean style (though obviously there were the hundreds of hours of cartoon watching and comic book reading that didn't hurt.) Looking at the pieces above and below, I really do see a close connection to Hoover's style, so much so that I would have to say that there is some sort of connection (as tenuous as it seems.) At the end of the day it's another piece of the puzzle at least. On a side note, I thought it was interesting how on-model the above image of Scooby is compared to the art in the rest of the book. You see this exact same pose repeated in the final image in the book, again leading me to think that a good bit of the artwork was traced from other existing Scooby Doo work.
Though I had a handful of other read-along storybook and record sets (namely Gremlins, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and the various weird Star Wars exopanded universe books like Planet of the Hoojibs), I don't remember if I had any others released by Peter Pan Records. I seem to remember the company character icon pretty well though. I wonder if it was from pouring over this Scooby Doo book so many times? Category: Awesomely Overdue Books -- posted at: 1:33 PM Comments[6] |
Mon, 17 November 2008 ![]() I'm sure I've written about this before, but one of the aspects I love the most about pop culture is how I can chart the time line of my life by what was bouncing around my skull at the time. Back in the late 80s, early 90s, my family was going though a lot of changes, mostly geographically, taking us from Florida to Massachusetts, then to New Hampshire, and eventually back down south to Georgia (all within a one year period.) This was a tough time for me as I was always in flux, leaving behind best friends and family, jumping into new climates (in particular dealing with snow for the first time in my life), and continuously changing schools (as well as going from middle back to elementary because the programs up north had 6th grade as part of elementary.) The only constant in my life at the time was my love for and addiction to the DuckTales cartoon. Actually it was DuckTales and the movie Willow as my mother was also in a weird place, and we ended up watching Ron Howard and George Lucas' under appreciated fantasy flick almost nightly. For me, sitting down in front of the TV and hearing the opening synthesized drum beats from the DuckTales theme was like a warm blanket and a cup of chicken noodle soup. There was nothing more comforting at the time than watching Huey, Dewey, Louie, Doofus, Uncle Scrooge, Duckworth, Webby, Ms. Beakley, Launchpad, Gyro, Gizmoduck, and Bubba the prehistoric cave duck battling the likes of Magica de Spell, Flintheart Glomgold, the Beagles Boys, and El Capitan (from the original miniseries.) It was always a treat when Donald duck would make an appearance, getting some shore leave from the Navy to spend some time with his nephews. The below sheet of stickers was released in 1986, though I'm not sure if it was part of a Hallmark set or if it was just distributed by Disney (or a subsidiary) in other retail outlets… ![]() Aside from ditching one of the Beagle Boys in the set above (and replacing it with a Magica de Spell sticker) I think this sheet does a nice job of representing the main characters of the show. I was surprised to see Doofus getting some love here as he was pretty annoying, though I'm not sure who he's be replaced by. I love Gryo Gearloose, but I'm not sure if he was a fan favorite, and I'm not surprised there isn't a Ms. Beakley sticker. Gizmoduck would have been cool, but this sheet was printed before his appearance on the show. Actually, I'm sort of surprised there wasn't a Flintheart sticker as he is more or less the main villain of the show, at least in terms of being Scrooge's nemesis. Getting back to the show itself for a second, Ducktales, the second Disney cartoon released in the 80s (after the Adventures of the Gummi Bears), and the first of their syndicated fare (which would be followed by shows like Rescue Rangers, Talespin, and Darkwing Duck throughout the 90s) is probably the best written and executed of the various Toon Disney shows (at least IMO.) Also, the revamp of the Duckberg characters was probably the most subtle of the various Disney chartoons adding hints of Indiana Jones' adventures to spice up the shenanigans of the greedy Scrooge and his mischievous nephews (as opposed to throwing a bunch of the Jungle Book characters into the odd air pirate setting of Talespin, or making Chip and Dale into makeshift MacGyver's in a Wings sitcom setting.) For me, DuckTales marks the end of my afternoons watching more or less realistic action cartoons after school (like Transformers, G.I. Joe, Thundercats, Silverhawks, and Bravestarr), and the shift into more cartoony action/comedy fare (like Tiny Tunes, the Disney Shows, Animaniacs, and Freakazoid.) Luckily the show has begun to be released on DVD by Disney (there are currently three volumes containing 75 of the 100 produced episodes, including the original mini series, available), though the sets are a bit lacking. The episodes are out of order, and currently there are no plans to release the final 25 episodes of the show, which is kind of a shame, though if nothing else, the sets are pretty cheaply priced. Category: Peel Here Volume 7 -- posted at: 11:33 AM Comments[5] |
Fri, 14 November 2008 ![]() There are a ton of reasons why I'm a nerd/dork/geek/what-the-fuck-ever, but if I had to pick one that exemplified this blog, it would probably have to be the word document file that I've been working on for the past four years that I call "the list." What is on this list you probably aren't asking? Well I'll tell you. It's a list of every film I've ever seen. Not so dorky you say? Well it's also annotated. Over the course of the past four years I've spent a good bit of my spare time reading over IMDB lists, complete video and DVD release guides, and any other list of films I could find to compile a list of everything I've ever seen, film-wise. I was pretty proud of myself at first because this sprang out of boredom at work as I tried to think of some project that would take a long time, and when I decided to draw up the list, I figured that I'd never finish it. I have seen quite a few movies, but the thing that I felt was going to be the biggest stumbling block was finding thorough lists of flicks. See most of the lists and guides I was reading were either yearly best-of's, or limited to what has been released either on video or DVD, and even then these weren't exhaustive as they leaned toward more popular fare. So between these, 6 million Google searches, and my collection of movie ticket stubs that I started collecting about 20 years ago I managed to put together a pretty exhaustive list. Is anyone still reading this? God bless your inexhaustive patience and limit for boredom if you are. So were there any stipulations to what could and couldn't find a home on the list? There sure were. First off, I had to feel like I remembered a decent amount of the plot in order for the flick to make it on the list. If I remembered the title but couldn't remember the plot, I nixed it. Second, and this is the super stupid anal part of this list considering I'm the only person who will ever see it besides what ever estate lawyer lackey is forced to read through it upon my death, I had to feel like I watched the flick from beginning to end. So anything that I've seen edited on TV didn't make the list either. So what are these annotations you probably aren't asking about? Well, once I finished the general list it didn't seem quite as cool as I had hoped. I did mention that I was a dork right? So in order to make the list cooler than G. Gordon Liddy the night before the Watergate scandal broke, I decided to run through the list and mark each movie with some code. First, each flick was marked to show who (out of my circle of friends and family) that I saw the flick with. Then I marked it as to whether or not I saw it in the theater. Then whether or not I owned it. Then I figured I'd try and mark the approximate number of times I could remember watching it. This list was really starting to take shape now. I had to make a key for the various notations. As a coupe de grace, I decided to highlight all the flicks that I wanted to own on DVD, and then whether or not they were available on DVD, so now the list was all colorful as well. Outside of feeling like the biggest anal-list-retentive geek on the planet, I felt like all the time and effort I put into the this was well worth the, well, effort, if for nothing else, than for giving me fodder for other boredom relieving activities like "count the seconds". Have you ever found yourself on the toilet with a calculator so bored that you decided to mathematically deduce the total number of seconds you've been alive, or the approximate number of breaths you've taken, or the possible number of times you've pooped in your life? Liar, I saw you doing it. Wil Wheaton has done it. Well, he wasn't on the toilet, but that's neither here nor there. Anyway, this list has a ton of statistics fodder for crap like this, from the approximate proportion of my life I've spent watching movies, to the ratio of films seen with each of my friends, and who I am more likely to see a flick with. Last warning, I mentioned I was a dork, okay, so stop screaming at me. One thing I'd like to do it to be able to compare this list to someone else's like another movie buff that's seen a ton of movies. I mean, even though the list took four years to finish and refine, at the end of the day there are only 1950 films on it. Is that a lot? Dunno. Doesn't look like a lot, but then it felt like a lot when I set out to make it. I think I might need therapy... Category: Buried in DVDs -- posted at: 12:42 PM Comments[3] |
Thu, 13 November 2008 ![]() Wow, when the heck did the middle of November jump in our laps?!? Mentally, I'm still back in late August trying to figure out how to not go stark raving mad because of all the changes at work. Sheesh. I'm totally neglecting the internet right now (actually it feels like I've been out of the game so to speak since the start of the year.) But I'm not writing to complain about my silly life woes, no I'm back to get into a fun head-space, and what better way to do this than by cracking open a bootleg copy of one of my favorite all time movies, the 1986 BMX cult classic RAD. Growing up in the 80s I had a chance to catch the insane home video boom right from the beginning, what with all of the mom & pop rental shops opening and the initial flood of movie titles on VHS and Beta. My family was a late adopter in terms of getting our own VCR, so instead we'd rent one every other weekend from a little store tucked in a corner of a Gooding's shopping center down the street from us. As a kid I was a creature of habit when it came to renting movies, not only because I loved watching the same flicks over and over, but also because there were only a handful of titles that I was interested in packed into that tiny rental store. I remember that the store was divided pretty evenly between Beta and VHS, and the little old couple that owned it only ordered the flicks in one format or the other. For some reason my parents only ever really wanted to rent a VHS player, so I was severely restricted in terms of titles to rent. Usually it was a choice between three or four movies, Red Dawn, War Games, SpaceCamp, and RAD, and for some reason the flick that I was always choosing was RAD. It was also around this time that I realized just how much VHS tapes used to cost back in the day. I think on my sixth or seventh rental I got up the courage to ask my mom for a copy of the movie for Christmas, so we asked the rental store owners how much a copy cost. ;'When they told us that a new copy of the movie would run about $110, both my and my mother's jaws hit the floor. Owning VHS was apparently only for the very, very rich in 1986 (well actually it was aimed at store owners for rentals as the industry really hadn't caught a whiff of just how much people wanted to own copies of films.) So I never got a copy of RAD on VHS, and later on when I starting building my own library of films, I was cheated again as RAD has never been officially released on DVD. I had to resort to picking up a bootleg copy on ebay, which was just a crappy port of an old VHS rental ripped and burned to disc. My copy did come with a nice bonus disc though, which included the majority of the RAD soundtrack songs. The flick begins with the very iconic Tri-Star opening (with the Pegasus running kitty corner into the screen and then leaping over the logo), something that I associate with plenty of Saturday afternoons spent glued to the TV during movie marathons. ![]() Anyway, I thought I'd sort of go through the movie chronologically and talk about the stuff I find interesting. RAD is part of an unofficial trilogy of flicks in the 80s that touch on the 3 main popular extreme (for lack of a better term) sports of the decade (skate boarding, which was covered by the movie Thrasin', surfing covered in the seriously underrated flick North Shore, and BMX.) Though there were a couple other BMX movies in the 80s (namely the Aussie flick BMX Bandits, which was more about escaping murderous thieves than BMX), none were as cool to me as RAD. The opening features a plethora of professional BMXers free-styling over the credits, set to the rocking Jon Farnham tune, Break the Ice (which deserves to be held up with other 80s triumphant movie rock ballads like Rock Until You Drop from Monster Squad, and You're the Best from Karate Kid.) ![]() The flick was produced by Jack Schwartzman, the husband of one of the film's stars, Talia Shire (and father of Wes Anderson regular Jason Schwartzman.) It was directed by Hal Needham, the guy responsible for many of the goofy Burt Reynolds car-centric comedies of the late 70s and early 80s (like Smokey and the Bandit and the Cannonball Run series), so you know that he can handle the fast paced action of RAD. I think it was during this credit sequence that I got the most jazzed while watching the flick. The pro BMX riders doing all sorts of stunts (which I can only hazard a guess to what the names are by using the internets) would always get me in the mood to go outside and try them myself. Trouble was that I'm horribly uncoordinated when it comes to most physical activities, not to mention that I'm deathly afraid of pain and looking too much like an ass (a trait I've since grown out of), so I'd get pumped, go outside to ride my bike (a sweet powder blue and white GT Performer covered in pink GT stickers), fall off once while trying to do a simple trick and then pedal back home in a huff. Pretty sad I know. Guess I would have been the definition of a poser. Anyway, the flick's main star is Bill Allen who at the time was a 24 year-old guy who looked a hell of a lot like a young Powers Booth. Playing opposite of Allen was a young Lori Loughlin, who would later on play Uncle Jessie's girlfriend/wife on Full House for six or seven seasons. Rounding out the cast (in terms of the more known established actors) are Ray Walston of Fast Times at Ridgemont High fame, Jack Weston (who I remember mostly from Dirty Dancing, Ishtar and Short Circuit 2, but who also had turns in flicks like the Cincinnati Kid and the original Thomas Crown Affair), and H.B. Haggerty (who was a familiar wrestler and starred in another underrated flick from the 80s, Million Dollar Mystery.) ![]() In the above screen caps you can take a gander at two of my favorite 80s BMX memories, the first being a fabled full pipe and the second my favorite freestyle move though I have no idea what it's called. Basically it's when someone does an endo, starts pogoing on the front tire and whips the frame of the bike around in circles, stepping over it as it flips around. ![]() ![]() The opening credits sequence is one of those (for me) breathtakingly awesome bits of 80s nostalgia and excitement that I revel in like a drug. Between the sickly sweet fist pumping heartfelt ice breaking and right making anthem playing over the free-styling action, and the non stop montage of professional BMX riders doing all your basic tricks and such, it's just 80s perfection. Every time I hopped on my GT Performer heading out for school in the morning, this is the kind of thing I had in my mind's eye. Sure, I couldn't do much besides popping a wheelie or coming to a side-sliding stop, but I always imagined I was just as talented and, well, cool. Never meant to be though. Anyway, back to the film. The action opens on Cru Jones and his two friends Becky and Luke, splitting up to do their morning paper routes… ![]() What follows is a montage (of which this film has in spades) of the three playing out every possible BMX cliché and fantasy, at least in terms of riding around a local neighborhood goes. There's riding through construction sites (which was always a favorite of mine growing up within a series of newly built subdivisions…) ![]() …followed by the perfectly timed (or not so much so) jump off of one structure onto a car (and the hilarious wipe out that ensues, complete with straightening of hair and uttering the word "gnarly".) ![]() To illustrate just how ensconced Cru and his compatriots are in their small town, the local fire department is shown getting their delivery mid-street at the appointed time, as well as a friendly garbage man who obviously gives Cru a 'lift' on a regular basis… ![]() Of course, everything isn't wine and roses. The filmmakers had to make sure and keep an edge to the characters, which is where the ornery residents of the 'hood come in. You've got the guy who doesn't appreciate his paper thrown into his flower bed, and the most typecast curmudgeon of all time, Ray Walston, who gets a walkway full of spilled coffee and newspaper, courtesy of our hero Mr. Jones. ![]() The sequence ends with Cru in the middle of town staring down an iconic clock tower pumped at another shot at his own best time. Again, though this sequence is pretty cliché, it does address a lot of what it felt like to cut through my own neighborhood, using my regular shortcuts through golf courses, and light woods to get to school or my friend's houses. There's even a nicely executed bit with Cru riding though a specifically rigged section of fencing (again, another childhood fantasy of secret passageways hidden throughout the subdivision), which he then turns to face revealing the plot of the film in an advertisement for Helltrack, a 7-Eleven sponsored BMX event coming to the small town. ![]() Again, the plot is pretty straight forward with the corrupt owner of a BMX company (an actual company Mongoose, who I'm sure didn't realize how their company was going to be painted when they agreed to be featured in the film) putting on Helltrack to promote one of his star riders, Bart Taylor (played by real life Olympian Bart Conner), and securing a million dollar T-Shirt licensing deal. The catch, and the entry of our hero into the story, comes with a local town hall meeting where the residents want to know if local talent can enter into the race. After some thought, Mongoose owner Duke Best (played with plenty of sleeze by Jack Weston) decides that there will be a qualifying race, the top contenders of which will be featured in the final Helltrack race. ![]() If you've ever seen a kids flick in your life you can probably figure out the rest of the film from here. But this is beside the point as the cult status of this film isn't in its intricate plot shenanigans, but in the 80s laced cheese, and fun BMX sequences. One of my favorite of which takes place in a lumberyard where our heroes have a clubhouse (again, another staple of my childhood fantasies realized on film.) Again, like with the morning paper route antics, this group of BMX nerds is apparently frequently confronted by a local motorcycle cop (played by the iconic H. B. Hagerty) who chases them for sport. In this bit, it involves riding around huge stacks of freshly cut & stacked wood, as well as a mountain of logs that Cru ends up very unconvincingly riding up to evade the policeman (you can see the planks through the logs the stunt rider used to scale the heap.) It's crazy and over the top set to a goofy fun rock song called Get Strange by the act Hubert Kah. ![]() Of course, there's also the angle of the Cru's home life with precocious sister Wesley (place in pitch perfect Peppermint Patty tomboy by Laura Jacoby), and his hardworking depressed mother played by Talia Shire (who brings way more gravitas to the role than the film probably calls for, but is plenty welcome.) Basically, the old push and pull of Cru's hopes and dreams of becoming an ace BMXer, and his obligation to get good grades and go to college (the money for which his mother works hard to earn.) It's not enough that there's a super evil greedy BMX company owner to contend with. ![]() Completing the template set up by films like the Karate Kid, Cru also has to master that perfect race winning BMX trick, the awe inspiring 360 degree mid jump back flip. It's surely the crane kick of this film, though is eventually more or less useless in the grand scheme of things. ![]() The film really picks up steam with the introduction of the main villains of the piece, Bart Taylor and his twin toadies, Rod & Rex Reynolds (played by the dreamy real life twins Carey and Chad Hayes respectively.) They're introduced in the weirdest fashion, a parade through the center of town. Granted, the whole Helltrack business would probably be a big deal, but parade worthy? I don’t know. Of course, blowing into town along side Bart, Rod, and Rex is the lovely Christian Hollings (played by the one and only Lori Loughlin, who looks about ten years older than the character she was cast to play.) ![]() One of the weird themes in this flick involves our hero Cru not always portrayed in the best of lights. As I mentioned in the beginning of the film he's not the best paperboy, annoying shop keeps by riding through their stores, and knocking coffee out of senior citizen's hands willy nilly. There's also a short bit with Cru jumping a fence into the school parking lot right into the middle of a group of yuppie teens, who granted probably deserved it, though it's still unprovoked and not the nicest. During the parade, there is a weird sequence where Cru and his friends stop the parade to let a lady in a car on a side street through the traffic, but then to the angry sneers of the evil BMXers and being chased by the local fuzz, Cru beats a hasty getaway by jumping his bike onto a car and riding over it. Maybe it's just the crotchety old curmudgeon in me, but this would have pissed me off and I'm sure dented the hood and roof to hell and back. Maybe I'm just getting to old to appreciate these teen action flicks. ![]() By far, my favorite sequence in the entire film revolves around a school dance that Bart, Rod and Rex are forced to attend while in town. The scenes feature two of the zaniest, most ridiculous dance sequences ever put to film (including both Rodney Dangerfield performances in Caddyshack and Back to School.) The first is the stupendously retarded evil line dancing bit, set to the song Music That You Can Dance To by Sparks. Bart Taylor is decked out in his supremely "cool" suit jacket over a plain yellow T-shirt looking like a reject Billy Zabka clone and is dancing with a hussy all gussied up to look like Debbie Harry. They're both so stiff and trying way too hard to exude sexiness that they come off laughable, particularly in their Macarena-like dance moves (don't you dig the crossed arms grasping the shoulders dance move?) The look of evil intensity on their faces is offset by the absurd faux break dancing styles of the Reynolds twins dancing around a zebra-striped, skintight-lycra-wearing shell of a woman. Hands down, the evil dancing craziness reaches a nice crescendo when the twins drop to the floor doing the god awful push-ups move, followed by a double dose of the worm that has to bee seen to be believed. ![]() As all this is going on inside, Cru (who has come to the dance Dutch after being rebuffed earlier in the film), is doing a bunch of freestyle BMX tricks outside the school gym. A crowd begins to gather, when all of a sudden Lori Loughlin arrives and a very tenuous, yet lasting connection is formed between the two star-crossed lovers… ![]() …which leads to the single most insane dance sequence ever! ![]() Set to Real Life's Send Me an Angel, Cru and Christian proceed to rip up the floor BMX style, dancing on their bikes. The above screen captures just don't do this sequence justice. In fact I don't have the words to adequately describe just how over the top, hilarious, and amazing this sequence is (check out youtube for the proof and judge for yourselves…) This craziness is followed by a lightening fast procession of falling in love montage scenes set to With You by John Farnham. Again, it's predictably hokey, but lovable just the same and ends with the oddly named Ass Sliding scene. Why is there a nice concrete slide in the middle of the woods leading down into a nearby lake? Don’t know, but it makes for some zaney love scenes… ![]() Again, adding to the idea that Cru isn't the best person in the world, he ends up sort of cheating during the Helltrack qualifying races by riding outside of the boundaries to avoid entangling with the other racers, and skipping over obstacles. It's a weird message to send to kids, and it sort of ends up muddying the film a bit. Ces't la vie though. The sequence is scored by the rocking Thunder in Your Heart by John Farnham, which is equally as high five inducing as the opening song Break the Ice. It's rare that a movie like this get two fist pumping anthems… ![]() Of course, by taking part in the qualifiers, Cru has to pass up on taking his SATs, and really pisses his mother off. To complete the clichéd plot, Cru is wooed by both Duke Best and the evil BMX hussies to come ride for them, and just as soon as he turns them down, our hero finds more obstacles in the way of riding at Helltrack… ![]() Enter the last bit of cult styling to the movie with the introduction of the Rad Racing team, as Cru and his friends find that they have to have a liquid corporate sponsor in order to ride at Helltrack. The group decides to print up their own T-Shirts with their newly formed team logo and sell them to raise the money they need to race. ![]() Of course in all the ruckus there is some strife for the blossoming relationship between Cru and Christian. If this film holds the record for the most insane dance sequence, then it also holds the record for the corniest make-up love scene involving a god awful poster featuring pandas and ice cream, reenacted by the two doe-eyed lovers. ![]() As a quick aside, take a look at that monster comic book rack in that ice cream/convenience store! ![]() Again, falling back on the Karate Kid template, the film features a 'sweep the leg' moment as Duke Best informs Bart, Rod and Rex that they need to wipeout Cru no matter what it takes (punctuated by Weston knocking back some whiskey.) ![]() The film builds to the crazy BMX track called Helltrack, and boy does it live up to its name. Featuring an almost two story vertical drop and some craze jumps (for standard BMX bikes at least), not to mention a giant cereal bowl (of Kix no less), Helltrack was a very convincing set piece. ![]() Again, another strength of this movie was that it featured a bevy of real BMX superstars… ![]() A). Team Hutch – Jeff Ingram. B). Team Robinson – Richard Fleming. C). Factory DK – Robert Rupe. D). Powerlite – Danny Millwee. E). Redline Team – Scott Clark. F). Norco – Kirk Bihun. G). GT – Mike Napareho. H). Binghams Schwinn – Glen Adams. I). Peddle Power Rider – Chris Phoenix. J). Team Robinson – Travis Chipres. K). GT – Eddie Fiola (who also did most of the stunt riding for Cru in the Film as well as being the Technical Advisor on the stunts.) L). GT – Kevin Hull. M). Skyway – Richie Anderson. N). Vans – Beatle Rosecrans. O). Hutch – "Hollywood" Mike Miranda. ![]() ![]() ![]() All in all, this is one of my favorite cheesy films from the 80s, one that I can watch a hundred times in a row and never get tired of. I'm sure true BMX fanatics can't stand the flick, but as a kid I loved it to pieces. Hopefully one day it'll get a true DVD release, but in the meantime I hear that Bill Allen is signing copies of the bootlegs (as well as selling headshots.) Also, don't forget to check his site for some more Rad trivia, straight from Cru's mouth... Category: Buried in DVDs -- posted at: 9:04 PM Comments[12] |
Thu, 13 November 2008 ![]() Did you ever wonder how some people can find the time to have multiple blogs? Well I did, and then for some insane reason decided to start up a second about a year or so ago called Buried in DVDs where I waxed deconstructive on my favorite movies and my DVD collection. I felt awesomely productive for a few months, and then I was all of a sudden asking myself where in the hell did I think I'd find the time for a second site and promptly stopped updating it. I think I initially wanted to keep this content separate from Branded as I was going to get into a lot of non-eighties flicks and TV shows, but honestly, I don't really think it's necessary to paint myself into such a tight 80s corner. So I've decide to integrate the archives of Buried in DVDs into Branded (a process that is one hell of a time sucker. ) Anyway, for anyone curious, there are a handful of Buried posts, well, buried in this site now (you can access them through the banner on the sidebar.) Hopefully this will free me up to posting about movies and TV shows again as I at least feel it's all working toward the same goal (and site) now… Category: Buried in DVDs -- posted at: 1:01 PM Comments[0] |
Thu, 6 November 2008 ![]() It's kind of weird how much I switch off holiday-wise after Halloween. Sure, there are aspects to some of the American holidays that get me excited, but there really is no other holiday that even remotely gets me jazzed besides the 'ween. I like seeing my family during Christmas, but I'm getting to a near Scrooge level of bah-humbugging when it comes to the pageantry and gift giving. From a totally pop culture angle there isn't much about Easter that floats my boat besides my first Cadbury Egg of the season (which is also subsequently my last as well.) I detest the pointlessness and card company greed of Valentine's Day (not to mention that I can't find sets of kid or cartoon inspired card sets that I dig anymore.) I don't have the energy or interest in color-coordinating my clothing choices for St. Patrick's Day. Fear of living in rough neighborhoods and a general Curmudgeon-ness has also deflated my love of the sound of fireworks during the 4th of July (not to mention my near non-existent general patriotism for being an American, and the fact that no one ever stops with the fourth to set off firecrackers and the like and it gets old real quick.) That leaves Thanksgiving, and again I find myself teetering dangerously toward falling out of love with the holiday. I've never managed to wake up early enough to enjoy the Macy's parade, I don't watch football, and gorging myself until I pass out from all-too-rough heart palpitations isn't as fun as it used to be (besides tarragon and thyme scented night sweats aren't the most attractive prospect.) If the holiday has one thing going for it, it's the autumn association with Halloween. Pumpkin iconography, sharing similar color schemes, and shelf space in a lot of stores in particular. This was a way-too-long intro for the following set of stickers in this week's edition of Peel Here… ![]() This sheet of stickers was released by Hallmark in 1984 and features a very weird video game theme that's in line with the sort of made-up video games you'd find in an arcade in Springfield (in the Simpson's.) I'm assuming (and this really is a stretch considering these are just silly stickers) that the Turkeyvision game was modeled after Pac-Man with a manic turkey (instead of our hungry round yellow hero) gobbling up candy corn in place of power pellets, and being chased by little pilgrims and Indians (instead of multi-colored speedy ghosts.) Now that I'm thinking about it, I'd really dig a skin-able version of Pac-Man, especially if I could design my own character sprites. How much fun would it be to navigate a floating Charlie heard through a maze of candy pellets being chased by umpa lumpas (as a fer-instance?!?) Anyway, take these stickers as you will… Category: Peel Here Volume 7 -- posted at: 1:16 PM Comments[1] |
Wed, 5 November 2008 ![]() Just wanted to pop out of my post Halloween hibernation for a second and point to the new episode of the Art & Story podcast (hosted by Mark Rudolph and Jerzy Drozd.) Jerzy & Mark have been lining up some awesome interviews on the show lately (in particular their recent conversation with animation giant Tom Sito), and this week they got a chance to speak with the very awesome and talented voice actor Bill Ratner, who was responsible for bringing the character Flint to life on the G.I. Joe cartoon! If you haven't seen G.I. Joe (here's an example of his portrayal of Flint), you've probably heard him narrating movie trailers, and most certainly in commercial voice-overs. I highly suggest you give the show a listen, and check out the archives as the duo has really done a great job deconstructing the process of storytelling as it relates to making comics (as well as hitting other areas.) Category: general -- posted at: 7:49 AM Comments[0] |
Fri, 31 October 2008 ![]() Well, this Halloween season has buzzed by so fast I feel like I could use a whole second month to celebrate. As per usual, we haven't yet heard the pitter patter of tiny trick-or-treater's feet at the door, and again we'll have a ton of candy to try and eat over the next month. One of these years we're going to get at least one kid and I'm telling ya, the whole candy bowl is going in that bag (and trust me, it's always the good stuff!) Anyway, I hope everyone has enjoyed my countdown, as well as visited the other fine blogs doing their creepy part to keep this month chock full of spooky goodness. Heck, I'll probably still be catching up on all the Halloween craziness for the next few months. Also, before I get into the meat of this post, I just want to give an official Happy Halloween to everyone out there. So on to the last countdown post for this season (barring any leftovers I might throw up tomorrow.) Before I broke down my mother's will and her kibosh on watching horror movies, there were only a handful of flicks that I was allowed to catch that fell into the horror vein. One of these was a favorite rental throughout my childhood, though for the life of me I didn't remember 90% of the film when I re-watched it this past month (after picking up an out-of-print copy from a local Hollywood Video that was closing its doors), Saturday the 14th (circa 1981)… ![]() I think I remember the film's 1988 sequel (Saturday the 14th Strikes Back) a bit more, though after watching the trailer for that film as well I'm not so sure. All I know is that for awhile growing up Saturday the 14th and the Great Pumpkin Charlie Brown seemed like the only seasonal fare on TV. ![]() I'm not sure exactly what I was expecting when I plopped this flick in the DVD player, but it sure as hell wasn't what I ended up watching. Fluttering between god awful silly slap stick, bad pun comedy, and a pretty pedestrian horror film spoof, Saturday the 14th just doesn't know what it wants to be. Again, seeing as I watched this a few times as a kid, and considering the film opens with a very goofy animation sequence, I figured this film to be kids flick fare… ![]() The film stars husband and wife duo Richard Benjamin and Paula Prentiss as John and Mary a couple who has just inherited a decrepit and spooky house. Of course, there are others who want the house, namely a couple of vampires named Waldemar (played with camp by Jeffrey Tambor) and Yolanda (played by Nancy Lee Andrews)… ![]() The flick was produced by Julie Corman (wife of famous B movie producer/director Roger Corman) who also brought us the illustrious trilogy of exploitation nursing films, The Night Nurses, the Young Nurses, and Candy Stripe Nurses, as well as Chopping Mall (a film I’ve been obsessed with since falling in love with the poster art at a young age, but have never actually sat through.) Howard R Cohen directed and penned the script (as well as writing the aforementioned the Young Nurses, which is where Corman probably came to know him; he also brought us episodes of Jayce and the Wheeled Warriors, Rainbow Brite, and Emmanuelle V!) ![]() As I mentioned above, the film opens with Tambor and Andrews lusting after the old creepy house that has been inherited by Benjamin, Prentiss and their two kids, Debbie (played by Kari Michaelson of Gimmie a Break! Fame) and Billy (played with smart-alecky goodness by Kevin Brando…) ![]() It seems that the house is cursed/haunted/possessed, and includes a copy of the Book of Evil, which has the power to unleash evil on the earth. Billy being the perfectly precocious and curious kid finds the book, opens it, ignores the warning and proceeds to let fly the monsters of evil (which include a rouges gallery of men-in-rubber-suit-monsters such as a mummy, a beastly werewolf, and a goofy looking monster with eyes on stalks that reminds me of the aliens from the Explorers movie.) ![]() There are a million bad puns and jokes, most issued by Richard Benjamin (who delivers the horrible dialogue with a grin and a smile.) After the 1st third of the film I felt that this was surely a kid's flick, and was then totally taken aback by the drawn-out stripping-before-a-bath scene that (in the kid's film context) seemed inappropriately alluring… ![]() I probably wouldn't have noticed if the scene didn't keep going and going, with plenty of close-ups on Kari Michaelson removing each piece of clothing slowly, and then continuously getting interrupted by phone calls and the like. Granted, there was a shark-fin-headed gill monster lurking in the water of the tub, which was supposed to be suspenseful, but was really more of an irritation that kept the camera off Michaelson here and there during her strip tease. I don't mind the disrobing scene in the least, it's just sort of weirdly placed in what I assumed was a kid's flick. Also, is it weird that my wife and I freeze-framed the screen to see the breast covering bubble bikini that Michaelson was wearing to keep the movie clean? ![]() The film takes another turn for the weirdly violent after the monster chases Michaelson throughout the house, and it's finally confronted by a cop (a neighbor of the newly moved-in family who happens to be passing by), who proceeds to shoot the creature in the heard (with large animated blood squirt and all…) ![]() The creature then strangles the cop to death in a very frantically gruesome manner, again propelling the film outside of children's movie territory and into a b-horror film. Nothing wrong with this, it just makes for a mighty odd combination. We then slip back into the goofy kid's comedy arena after the family calls an exterminator for an owl infestation (actually it's bats, but the running joke is that they're owls) and they get a house call from none other than Van Helsing himself (played with glee by Severn Darden.) ![]() The flick then see-saws between goofy and horrific as the wife is turned into a vampire by Tambor, and the family soon discovers that they are in fact trapped in the house by the power of the book (getting whipped in the face by a gust of wind and bright lights whenever they try and open a door, yet newcomers to the house seem to negate this effect.) It's all way-too-darkly-lit montages of monster parties, severed heads, and eyeballs in the coffee as the family (and the live-in Van Helsing) decide how they can defeat the book of evil and the house-crashing vampires. ![]() Saturday the 14th has one more surprise up its sleeve, as the plot comes to a head and we discover that the menace is really Van Helsing, who wants the power of the book to take over the world, and it's Tambor and Andrews who are trying to stop him… ![]() Billy brings the book to the vampires, and a battle of immense strength and wills takes place (e.g. Darden and Tambor make a bunch of silly faces at each other for a few minutes while trying to levitate Billy…) ![]() …and then the real action begins (well not really, but it was fun to type anyway!) There's plenty of goofy special effects involving Tambor and Darden throwing lightening and fireworks at each other before Waldemar defeats the evil Van Helsing… ![]() In the end, the family makes up with the vampires and agrees to sell them the house (they end up moving across the street into much nicer digs.) ![]() Honestly, I don't know what to think of this film. It's at times so-bad-it's-good, but mostly it's just bad, and I wonder what I found interesting about it as a kid. You can barely make out what the monsters look like as the majority of the film is shot in darkness, though this is probably for the best as the costumes seemed to be pretty cheap. All in all it just seemed like one big schizophrenic mess of a film that could only be surpassed by the sequel, Saturday the 14th Strikes Back… ![]() Again, I've only seen the trailer, but a lot of the imagery (especially the shot of the blonde girl who is huge inside of the house and you only see her eye from a window) and cast strikes a bell with me. This will certainly be one for me to track down… Well, that does it for this year's countdown. Here's to hoping I can find enough material for next year's. Happy Halloween folks! Category: Buried in DVDs -- posted at: 9:43 PM Comments[8] |
Thu, 30 October 2008 ![]() Before special edition DVDs and devoted internet fan sites there was pretty much only one great place to find out about all the fun little tidbits and facts on your favorite films, the souvenir film magazine. Well, they weren't really the only place for info (there were plenty of other magazines, newspapers and books helping to cover the ins and outs of film), but they sure were a good place to find out a lot about a particular movie. Of course you were limited to only the films that were deemed important enough to have a souvenir magazine, flicks like Rambo: First Blood Part II, the Karate Kid, Back to the Future, and presented today, Gremlins... ![]() Growing up in the 80s I bought, read and re-read the magazines released for the Karate Kid (and it’s sequel), Willow, and Tim Burton's Batman. Though I was just as obsessed with Gremlins, I never came across the magazine (though I did have an over-sized hardback story book, a book and record set, and a few smaller floppy storybooks that were illustrated instead of featuring film stills.) When I came upon this copy in a used bookstore recently I couldn't help but pick it up. These magazines were great, usually featuring a ton of film stills, interviews and peeks behind the scenes. This particular issue features a ton of storyboards, a poster and a lot of behind the scenes trivia… ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I used to cover my walls with this sort of pull-out poster. In fact when I turned 10 and became a hardcore Metallica devote, I cut out every single picture in the special Metal Edge Metallica souvenir magazine (even went so far as to but two copies so I could get the pictures from both sides of the pages) and cover one entire wall with clippings. What's weird is that the older I got the more I felt like I needed to grow out of this trend, growing into only hanging full-sized movie posters and such. Now I don;t even hang posters anymore. I guess I'm sort of a fuddy duddy that way... ![]() This issue also featured a fun ad for Don Post Gremlins Halloween masks (available in regular and deluxe furry editions!) ![]() Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 8:37 PM Comments[6] |
Wed, 29 October 2008 ![]() When I was out earlier in the year scrounging around for content for the 2008 Halloween Countdown, I never thought I'd find a cool little book that picked up the torch of the Crestwood Monster series (which I've written about both here, and here, as well as in the 1st issue of the Branded in the 80s magazine available for purchase here) in the early 90s, but I did. While I was browsing the ever awesome Bizarro Wuxtry in Athens, GA (kept up by the ever kind and knowledgeable Devlin Thompson) I spied a little baby blue paperback at the back of a glass case filled with all sorts of monster related goodness from the past 30 odd years. What immediately caught my eye was the marker attached to the cover which could mean only one thing (that this was some form of the invisible ink books that I grew up loving, having picked up a million and one Yes & Know books on family vacations over the years.) This was a great find though being monster themed and all and was called the Mark and See Universal Studio Monsters Frightening Facts book (circa 1992…) ![]() First things first, I was so jazzed that the back cover was a perfect copy of the front cover, even including an image of the attached marker, as there was no way I was going to get a good scan of the cover (since the marker bulged out so far.) Anyway, when I first picked up the book and headed home I assumed that it was just a Universal Monster themed Yes & Know book, but when I got home and really took a good look at it I was floored. Crammed into its 48 pages is a wealth of material on all of the Universal monster movies and their source material that this one book contains almost the entire Crestwood Monster Series… ![]() There are sections devoted to Frankenstein, Dracula, the Wolfman, the Mummy, and the Creature from the Black Lagoon that feature one page Cliff's Notes versions of the main films, as well as background on the characters and some fun facts on the films… ![]() Though a lot of the interior artwork is re-purposed from the 90s Universal Monster campaign (as seen in the top left of the cover), there are also a lot of nice full page stills from the movies… ![]() Most surprising of all was that the invisible ink marker still works, even after sitting on various store shelves for the last 16 years. Now that's quality! ![]() ![]() ![]() The book also features four detachable monster trading cards with some nifty airbrushed artwork. Snazzy! ![]() ![]() Stuff like this really warms my heart as I'll always be a fan of the Universal monsters films first and foremost, and (probably pointlessly) I fear that as the years go on and the films get older and lose some of their relevance to the current generation that more and more kids aren't going to get introduced to them. Crestwood was there for me as a kid, and Universal themselves were picking up the slack in the 90s, but what about kids today? What books are out there turning pre-teens into Franky Fans? Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 7:28 PM Comments[0] |
Tue, 28 October 2008 ![]() New Halloween candy has really been a mixed bag this year. Overall I was pretty disappointed with the crop, but I have to admit that there were some pretty crazy concepts and designs floating about. There were some really fun repackaging designs as in the Halloween Nerds that popped up way back in early August… ![]() I mean as Nerds candy goes, it's kind of hard to find new ways to market it outside of pretending that the little candy coated grains of sugar are edible aquarium pebbles. So when Wonka put 'em in plastic test tubes with monster shaped stoppers and called them antidotes, vaccines, makeovers, and morphs, it was pretty ingenious. In essence I'm getting a little plastic monster toy, candy, and imagination fodder for pretending that the only thing keeping me from sprouting fangs and draining my wife of her life blood is the test tube of candy that is just outside my reach! Seriously though, these were a great way of getting me excited about a candy that I've known and loved for years. It also doesn't hurt that the werewolf figure/stopper bears an uncanny resemblance to A.L.F.! ![]() In that same vein (oh ho, what a bad pun), we have Confectionery Lane's Halloween contribution this year in the form of a crazily realistic liquid candy Blood Bag! ![]() When I saw Harris Smith write about this candy wonder over at his blog Negative Pleasure, I knew I was going to have to rush out and find the nearest Walgreen's and procure a bag for myself. This is the essence of perfect Halloween candy, at least in concept. What kid wouldn't squeal with glee at getting one of these realistic bags of blood plopped into their goody bag come Halloween night? Unfortunately, as Mr. Smith points out in his post, the liquid candy is pretty awful. It's way too sour and chemically enhanced sweet that it would be quite the chore to consume the bag without puking up blood colored vomit minutes later. Also in the fun-in-concept-but-awful-in-execution department we have yet another large gummy severed hand make a debut this year, this one from Amos Sweets… ![]() This severed gummi hand is about the same size as this year's severed hand gummy from Flix Candy, and just about as inedible. I'm getting the feeling that the larger gummi candy gets the more and more it starts tasting like rubber or plastic… ![]() So, going by this thought one would think that any "normal-sized" gummy candy would probably taste fine right? Wrong. I had very high hopes for a late comer in the Halloween candy department, Sherwood Brands line of Gummi Scary Treats candy… ![]() These four boxes of gummi candy had some of the most fun packaging designs I've seen in recent years. These die-cut wraparound boxes scream love and attention to detail, so it was a real disappointment when the candy housed inside was pretty bland, and a little chemical tasting. ![]() Probably the best effort in the gummi candy department as far as merging a great concept with a good taste was the 3-foot-long Big Fat Hissie Fit Gummy Snake I found at my local Wal-Mart… ![]() This is a pretty impressive piece of confection as it's pretty much a life-sized gummy snake and it's pretty good as far as over-sized gummi candy goes. I could see myself easily making my way through this monstrosity during a day watching horror flicks, though I'm sure I'd regret it soon after. How much gummi candy can one eat in a day anyway? All in all, I think I'm too easily swayed by the wolf in sheep's clothing when it comes to Halloween candy. I want the crazy insanity of a giant lollipop Halloween mask, but I also want the quality of your everyday Nerds or fun-sized candy bar. I think this is asking for a bit much though, at least not without a heft price tag. Who knows, there's always next year… Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 11:18 AM Comments[2] |
Mon, 27 October 2008 ![]() Wow, this month is flying by. It's already the week of Halloween, how in the hell did that happen?!? Well, I stumbled a bit last week in terms of keeping up a daily posting schedule, but it's certainly not the end of the world. I am on vacation from the stupid day job this week, so I should be able to cram it chock full of Halloween-y goodness. First up is my half of the Branded in the 80s/Art & Story Podcast cross over event. When Mark Rudolph, Jerzy Drozd, my wife and I got together to talk about horror storytelling and Halloween we recorded enough material for both of our podcasts. Their half, episode 61 of the Art & Story podcast is up and available at their site, and now here's the second half. We end up talking for around 40 minutes about some Halloween memories past (in particular costumes and some fun candy gathering hyjinks) as well as talking a bit about how we celebrate the holiday today. Talking with these guys is always fun for me, so I hope you can get some pleasure from the conversation as well. To listen you can either click on the banner below, or right click and save it to your computer for ipod/mp3 player listening and such. ![]() Again, if you enjoy this podcast, take a minute to check out the Art & Story show, as Mark and Jerzy have really put together a great podcast… ![]() Direct download: Branded_in_the_80s_Halloween_2008_Episode_2.mp3 Category: podcasts -- posted at: 1:28 PM Comments[0] |
Thu, 23 October 2008 ![]() I wanted to take a minute and point to one of my favorite podcasts, Art & Story (hosted by Mark Rudolph and Jerzy Drozd), which I had the extreme pleasure to take part in recently. Jerzy and Mark do an amazing job deconstructing the process of writing and illustrating comics (storytelling in general), and I was invited to the conversation to help get into the nuts and bolts of horror storytelling. We ended up talking about why people choose to watch and read horror stories referencing our own personal taste in horror movies and such. I had an absolute blast during the recording and I think we did a good job starting the conversation on horror as a storytelling genre. ![]() We also recorded material that I'm going to use for the basis of another Branded in the 80s podcast, a look down the Halloween-y memory lane, which I'll hopefully have cobbled together and ready for everyone's listening pleasure this weekend. It's a Branded in the 80s/Art & Story crossover, 80s Marvel comics style! Also, Mark Rudolph has another great podcast on Metal music called the Requiem, which I also urge anyone interested in broadening their listening horizons to checkout. Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 9:06 PM Comments[0] |
Thu, 23 October 2008 Day 23 of the Halloween Countdown: I wonder when the first edible full-body costume will come along? ![]() Well, this certainly is the week from hell (as far as the day job goes.) I can't wait for tomorrow to be over because I'll then be on vacation until the end of October. Anyway, I hated missing yesterday's posting, but thems the breaks. To make up for it today, I'm going to take a second to talk about the craziest piece of Halloween candy I've found this year, and possible ever, the Tricky Treats Mask Pop from Brand New Products, LLC! ![]() When I saw this on the shelf at my local Wal-Mart I just about crapped myself with a mixture of awe and fright. Sure, we've all probably seen the giant rainbow colored confections that the Lollipop Guild carried in the Wizard of Oz (a lollipop that is also a staple of the Walt Disney theme park experience), but this Mask Pop sure beats those other suckers bloody. This insane piece of candy clocks in at just under a pound (at 13 ounces/369 grams, 330 of which is sugar) and has 1400 calories! ![]() Health hazard aside, this is an ingenious product that borders on the sadistic for sucker enthusiast and the parents or loved ones of said enthusiast alike. It's as if one of Homer Simpson's world-made-of-candy daydreams came to life Halloween-style. I mean what kid wouldn't love traipsing around the neighborhood on All Hallows Eve, knocking on doors, and screaming out "Trick or Treat" from behind one of these delectably gruesome masks, scaring poor old grandmothers and strong-arming them into giving them sweets, and then, when the night of greedy debauchery is through, getting to eat your own Halloween mask?!? ![]() Now I did mention that this awesome mouthful-of-cavities-waiting-to-happen is sadistic, and here's why. Being that it's a mask made out of candy, as soon as you unwrap it, it's almost impossible not to make an exploratory lick. Bust even the slightest bit of moisture near this giant lollipop brings out the sticky, so even if a kid could resist nibbling on an ear, their warm breath trapped behind the mask will certainly make it one giant mess. I was kind of skeptical about this whole deal, even thorough my near-bowel-moving excitement, as it just seemed too good to be true. I feared that the pop itself would taste disgusting, if not just bland, and I wasn't sure how well it would work as a mask. There were a few varieties to choose from including a cat-like demon, a pumpkin head, a witch, and a pretty frightening clown, but this zombie pop is the one that really sang to me. Besides, a lot of the other pops tended to have the mask eye holes separate from the design of the face (so there were effectively two sets of eyes to the mask), and this zombie was a nice combination of form and function with only one set. When I got home immediately ripped the pop out of the plastic packaging and had my wife give it a test drive. The verdict? This is one creepy-as-hell mask! ![]() As far as the edibility factor goes, it was surprisingly great. The zombie pops are grape flavored and it was quite tasty. There's no way in hell I'd ever eat the whole thing, but I nibbled off an ear and chipped off some sticky goodness here and there. What's kind of funny is that the mask only gets more and more disturbing the more little bits you eat off of it. This is an amazing piece of candy, though it is pretty damn unwieldy, especially after you start eating it (there really is no going back from that point…) Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 7:56 PM Comments[4] |
Tue, 21 October 2008
Category: Awesomely Overdue Books -- posted at: 10:00 PM Comments[3] |
Mon, 20 October 2008 ![]() This is going to have to be a quick countdown entry today (work is crazy stupid killing me today.) This is from the Fall 1986 issue of the He-Man & the Masters of the Universe magazine. Make your pumpkins the mightiest pumpkins in the universe! ![]() Hopefully I'll get a chance to update later with the cover to the magazine and some other interior treats from the issue… **Update** Here's some more from that issue of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe Magazine including the cover... ![]() ...this really fun PAAS Halloween make-up kit ad (I always thought PAAS was just about the Easter swag..) ![]() ...and this Pineapple Kids Club ad (notice those four Glow Ghosts!) ![]() Hopefully I'll have more time tomorrow! Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 1:00 PM Comments[2] |
Fri, 17 October 2008 ![]() Last year during the ghouliest season of the year I wrote about a piece of Halloween candy that completely floored me as it was the single craziest, and largest gummi I'd ever seen called the Mad Lab Frog Dissection Kit (which was part of the Target-specific branded candy under the Edgar & Ellen heading.) Though I was completely dazzled by the kit, in particular the molding on the frog gummi itself and the concept in general, I sort of lamented a couple of the design elements (or lack thereof.) The set came with some gummi flies that were tucked away in a little baggy hidden in the hollowed-out belly of the frog. Personally I thought this was a missed opportunity as the set is a 'dissection' kit, and it would have been so cool to have to cut into the frog (with the provided plastic knife) to liberate the flies. I also thought that it might have been cool to include some sort of liquid candy (like the innards of a Squeeze Pop) to give the impression of a gruesome reptilian autopsy. Well I was pretty happy this year when I first glimpsed the 2008 Target candy section and saw that the gummi frog dissection kit had made a comeback. It's a bit smaller, though just as heavy, and I hoped as I was standing in the checkout line that it's reduced stature and increased heft might mean that there were some dreamed of improvements… ![]() Target ditched the Edgar & Ellen branding this year in lieu of their new Domo theme (as I mentioned in the inaugural post for this year's countdown), and the new dissection kit has since been relegated to the normal Target monster character branding (as well as being a great example of the design of this year's offerings, package-wise.) It's been re-dubbed a Gummy Dissection Kit (a bit more generic to give room for other varieties as we'll see in a minute), and is pretty much just a pared down version of last years affair… ![]() Basically the gummi flies and a good bit of the molded details have been dropped, and though the frog itself has shrunk, it's now solid and has an opaque section of gummi layered on top of the more standard green translucent base. As I plunged the little orange plastic knife into the tough gummi flesh I still had hopes that there was a liquid surprise inside, but I was disappointed as it's just one sold gummy frog. Also, it's still green apple flavored (not my favorite by a long stretch) so I didn’t really care for the taste, though it has a better consistency than the Flix gummies I talked about a couple days ago. This year we can also choose a second dissection kit if the frog doesn't float our boat. The gummi heart is a welcome addition to the stable of oversized (almost life-sized) confections around this season. It's exactly like the frog with no fun little discoveries tucked inside, and is strawberry flavored, so it might be more palatable for those of us who don't care for green apple candy flavoring. ![]() All in all, I'm still a little disappointed at the missed opportunity of putting more 'dissection' elements into the candy, but it's still a neat idea that I'm sure kids are going gaga over. Maybe next year, huh? Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 5:00 AM Comments[0] |
Thu, 16 October 2008
Category: Awesomely Overdue Books -- posted at: 11:09 AM Comments[1] |
Wed, 15 October 2008 ![]() It's funny, I've spend a ton (for me) on candy for this Halloween season, but I've yet to talk about any of it yet, so I thought today would be a good day. The crop of interesting new stuff in the stores right now can hardly be described as a banner year for Halloween candy. Like most years, 90% of the treats are your basic fun-size output from the major companies, so you won't have a hard time finding any Snickers or Reese Peanut Butter Cups, and of the remaining 10% most of it is retreads of last years new products. Don't get me wrong, I'm just as happy to see Ghost Dots on the shelves again as finding something new, but it sure doesn't help me with content for the site. Anyway, I don't really have a preferential list of favorites, but I do have a handful of candies that feel like they deserve to be at the bottom of a proposed list, so it's as good a place to start as any. Basically this year, some of the candy I was most excited about picking up ended up being some of the worst tasting dreg I've ever shoved into my mouth. Flix Candy is sort of making a name for themselves in the odd/grotesque department with a whole assortment of gummi stye candies, ranging from the mildly amusing (Gummi Popcorn), to the out right nauseating (Zit Poppers gummi pimples.) I first rand across them a couple Halloween seasons ago with one of their first big entries into the market their Fresh Box of Boogers. What caught my eye initially was the super detailed mascot character on the packaging and the very odd concept of snot gummis. Back then I didn't care for the flavor and consistency of the product (they fell into the category of sugar coated gummis that were on the sour side, not some of my favorite things), and even though they supposedly have been improved in the past two years I haven't been able to bring myself to picking them up again. This year I couldn't help but notice how much the company has grown (in terms of product offerings), so I decided to give them another chance and I picked up 4 varieties including Zit Poppers, Bed Bugs, Freaky Fingers, and a life size gummi Gecko that I didn't bother to photograph after trying the rest of this stuff (it too was awful.) Zip Poppers… ![]() These are packaged in a very similar manner to the Boogers from a couple years ago and I was expecting them to be the worst of the bunch. Inside the box is a bag full of wet, translucent flesh-colored gummies with angry looking red tips that are filled with a bit of liquid candy (they are billed as Ozzy, Sticky, Goo Filled Zit Gummies after all.) Comparatively these are the best tasting candy I've sampled from Flix Candy to date, though they aren't nearly as good as most common brands of gummi candy and I'm not a fan of the sticky messy factor as it feels like an "eat-the-whole-bag-or-throw-the-remainder-away" kind of candy. The "zit-popping" aspect was lackluster at best (I've had better oozing experiences with Freshen Up gum), though there are quite disgusting to look at… ![]() Bed Bugs … ![]() I was really impressed by the quality of the design on the Bed Bugs candy, as it's pretty rare to find gummies with this many colors and this much detail in the molded design. Taste-wise their pretty damn horrible and a bit too tough for my gummi palate. If there was one saving grace (beyond their interesting appearance) it would have to be that fact that 4 of the 8 included gummis had a camouflaged candy sugar coating that make for a ghastly and realistic (I'm assuming here) bug crunch that really took me aback… ![]() Freaky Fingers… ![]() I’ve come across two large sized gummi severed hands this season which in and of itself is cause for celebration. For this Flix candy severed hand installment I was really jazzed by the coloring and the detail in the molded design. This looks like a perfect gummi zombie or decompsed corpse hand, though unfortunately as far as taste and consistency goes, this was horrible. The candy tastes like it's laced with a low quality gasoline or petroleum product of some sort, and it was tough as all get out. Maybe this is the trade-off for such a nice appearance and design, but if that's the case give me less detail and colors and a better taste and mouth-feel. This is candy we're talking about and it shouldn't be a chore to eat it. ![]() If nothing else, I hope Flix candy keeps plugging away at their formulas and hopefully they can find a nice middle ground between appearance and taste. They are trying which is something I can't say about a lot of other companies out there… Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 11:22 AM Comments[1] |
Tue, 14 October 2008 ![]() If I had to pick my favorite scary, creepy, Halloween-y character ever, it would most likely be Frankenstein's monster. There's something about his sad, lumbering, misunderstood figure that I can identify with. Over the years I've amassed a small collection of Shelley's book, as I'm always willing to pick up a new copy when I find a cover I really like, or (gasp!) if it's illustrated. One of my favorite permutations of the book is the 1988 Step-Up Classic Chillers adaptation by Larry Weinberg (published by Random House.) It's not the adaptation that I love, but the creepy cover (painted by Lisa Falkenstern), and the interior pen and ink illustrations by Ken Barr… ![]() There's something very menacing about the way the monster is pulling back the shroud on the cover; there's a bit more of the spark of life in the character's face and intent in his posture. As far as the interior illustrations go, I was surprised by how influenced they were by the classic Universal version of the creature's visage (I always thought that Universal was pretty litigious when it comes to squared-off, flat-topped interpretations of the monster.) Ken Barr's illustrations are really fun and are in the vein of 70s and 80s era comic book art (which makes sense considering Barr did a lot of work for Marvel and D.C., as well as men's adventure magazines.) If I'd have found this particular version as a kid I would have flipped for it… ![]() In particular I love how aged and weather beaten the monster's face appears, with the hard worn wrinkles and deep crags around his eyes and the evil looking laugh lines around his mouth. Granted, I also love the more standard vacant or innocent look the creature is given, but every once in awhile it's refreshing to see the seething anger just below the surface of the monster, if not outright as it is in this book… ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 12:37 PM Comments[1] |
Mon, 13 October 2008 As a quick aside from the Halloween festivities here at Branded, I thought I'd take a second and point to a fun project that Diana Nock put together on her newly re-designed site… ![]() If you were ever curious about seeing over 150 different artist's interpretations of swashbuckling, romantic, fuzzy, blue, teleporting elf Nightcrawler (of X-Men, Excalibur, and six million other Marvel comics fame), then take a second and check out the Nightcrawler Sketchbooks. It's a hoot. Category: general -- posted at: 3:17 PM Comments[1] |
Mon, 13 October 2008 ![]() Well, I did some podcasting this weekend, though it wasn't what I thought I might be doing. I won't go into the specifics until they're final, but I'll be a guest on another show in the coming weeks, and I snagged some audio for a Branded podcast that I'll hopefully have up this coming weekend. Should be fun. For the countdown today I present a few comics by the mega-awesome Sergio Aragones which he did for the October 1987 issue of MAD magazine. They all center around A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: The Dream Warriors…
Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 11:53 AM Comments[1] |
Fri, 10 October 2008 ![]() Well, today wraps up a week-long look at my collection of animation cels from the Real Ghostbusters cartoon, an even though I'm not familiar with the episode this particular set of three cels comes from, it's my favorite example from the show… ![]() When I first started picking up animation cels my wife was a bit skeptical. Even though she still adores cartoons in general, she wasn't sold on the idea of animation cels as interesting or as a piece of art. We came to the conclusion that she was really missing the overall appearance of the cartoon in that there were no backgrounds to go along with the still images I was showing her. I guess character cels out of context just didn't seem as much a part of the show, even though these are the exact cels that were filmed. There's just something to be said for the aesthetics of a complete image, even if it's not exactly feasible to obtain painted cartoon backgrounds. For one some backgrounds are very large paintings that encompassed entire environments and were "zoomed in on" or cropped as the 8"x10" or 11"x14" cel layers were placed on a section. Others were used repeatedly in many episodes and are much rarer (especially in terms of being packaged up with the photographed cels and stored after a series was done.) So when I happened upon the set pictured above, I knew my wife's eyes would light up as it's a much better example of a cartoon micro-second frozen in time. Now technically this set doesn't have a traditional background included. The cloud of purple smoke rippling behind the three anthropomorphized animal creatures is also a single cel that included its own moving aspects. It's enough to fool the eye though and that's all that matters (at least to my wife.) ![]() Besides the completeness which appeals to me, I also think it's a perfect example of the great animation that existed on the show. The rest of the cels I shared earlier in the week all seemed a bit rougher in terms of graceful line work, and since they were taken out of context of the scenes they were originally in you don’t get a feel for the over all compositions and color schemes from the cartoon, which I am still a big fan of. ![]() These figures are alao a heck of a lot more dynamic in terms of shape and depth because there is a layer of shadow and highlights to the figures that I'm not finding in a lot of the other cels I've purchased. This is an aspect of animation that really resonates with me, and it's why I was so drawn to anime when I first discovered it in the early 90s. When you compare a lot of traditionally animated fare from America (whether or not it was physically animated overseas) and most anime you'll notice this is one of the big differences, the use of layers of shadows and color variation that really makes animation pop. When I first started coloring my own art digitally, adding these additional layers was the "eureka" moment I needed to understand the process better (I wrote about this awhile back here.) I wonder if this is a step that tends to get skipped because of the possible expense in terms of time and energy spent on an aspect that will most likely be ignored by the target audience? ![]() ![]() Also, I wanted to take a second to remind everyone that the complete Real Ghostbusters series is going to be available for purchase soon. You can pre-order your set at the Time Life website (which is the only place outside of used copies that might end up on eBay) for $179. Though I'm currently coveting the set, I don't think it's going to be one that I can work into my DVD budget at that price (an in the complete series format.) So this closes the chapter on Halloween-y animation cels for this year's countdown. For the next couple weeks I'm going to keep the posts a little more random, though mostly 80s influenced. Also, I might be back this weekend for some more movie commentary podcasting, but first I need to watch more flicks… Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 9:52 AM Comments[3] |
Thu, 9 October 2008 ![]() A bunch of Real Ghostbusters animation cel posts wouldn't be complete without one red-haired, sassy, bespectacled receptionist extraordinaire named Janine Melnitz! ![]() In film and in TV Janine Melnitz gets credit for being one of my first real crushes (in good company with Faye Grant from V, Mitzi Mozzarella from the Showbiz Pizza Rock-Afire Explosion Band, Jacqueline Bisset circa 1983 in the flick Class, and of course Adrienne Barbeau.) One aspect of the character that I always found interesting was that she was pretty different style-wise in the cartoon than in the first movie, but by the time the second movie rolled around, the writers and designers (or at least Annie Potts) decided to co-opt the look from the cartoon. I did think it was kind of a cop-out that she dropped her interest in Egon in the 2nd film for of all people Louis Tulley. ![]() Anyway, back to the cel, as you can see above this cel is a prime example of the damage that can be done over time by storing them directly on top of the pencil under drawings. The under drawing adhered to the paint and was destroyed, forever merged with the cel. Granted, I don't think studios ever thought of the post-photographed cels as any sort of asset and I'm sure stuff them into boxes and packed 'em in un-climate controlled storage facilities to gather dust until the day when some unsuspecting citizen bought them in a blind storage auction. Being a huge fan of 80s cartoons, and considering these cels as pieces of art in and of themselves, I think it's a downright shame that they're mistreated and I'm sure a good portion of them are lost to time because they've either deteriorated or become one huge merged stack of cel, paint and paper. Oh well, at least I’ve managed to find a few and give them a good home. More or less rounding out the main cast of the Real Ghostbusters cartoon is one of my least favorite characters, Slimer, the ugly green spud himself. ![]() Though I didn't mind him as a humorous villain in the live action flicks, his presence in the cartoon added an unwelcome air of Scooby Doo-ness. Now don't get me wrong, I love Scooby Doo, but I never thought the Ghostbusters needed a pet-like mascot, and besides the odd relationship between Lydia and Beetlejuice in the BJ cartoon, I wasn't very find of twisting around the hero/villain roles for cartoon adaptations of movies. It doesn't help that as the series went on it morphed into an almost all-Slimer show which was nowhere near the quality of the proceeding seasons. ![]() ![]() Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 4:16 AM Comments[4] |
Wed, 8 October 2008 ![]() Honestly, I'm not quite feeling the Halloween-y with these Real Ghostbusters cels, so to remedy that a bit, lets skips past more cast members and get to some of the nifty monsters from the show! These rat-like subway creatures are some pretty gnarly customers. I think they're a nice example of the non-ghost cryptozological wonders that our four heroes battled against on a regular basis in the cartoon… ![]() As for interesting aspects to this first cel, I really dig the pencil under drawing that I scored with it. I'm not sure if the under drawing is hinting at the next drawing (which I suspect), or referencing the previous drawing and cel, but I love the alternate view of the creatures with their sharp-toothed mouths all agape. The creatures sure seem a heck of a lot more fierce that way to boot. ![]() Here's another cel of the same creatures from a later scene… ![]() ![]() There, that's a bit more in the mood I'd say… Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 4:45 AM Comments[1] |
Tue, 7 October 2008 ![]() Today's cel completes the core line-up of the Ghostbuster crew with Winston Zeddmore (Zeddemore in the movies) and Ray Stanz. As opposed to yesterday's cels, both characters are painted on the same layer which I think is kind of weird. Like I mentioned, I'm kind of confused as to when animators will combine characters on the same cel or split them up. I sort of figure that characters would be separated when one or both are "moving" so as to make it easier to keep them independent or save on mistakes, but in this cel it appears that Winston and Ray are having a conversation which would imply movement, at least in their heads and mouths. I don't know… ![]() Also in the vein of yesterday's discussion, I wanted to note that Winston also underwent a change between the movies and the cartoon in that the character seems much younger and enthusiastic, while dropping the almost burnt out mellowness of Ernie Hudson's live-action portrayal. I think character-wise he ended up changing the most, probably to make him more appealing to kids. ![]() One of the other aspects that this cel illustrates is how much cheaper the actual paint stock seems in comparison to cels from other cartoons. It's thin enough so that you can clearly see the photocopied line work on the cel through the layers of paint. ![]() Lastly, even though I always felt that the Real Ghostbusters had much better animation that a lot of its contemporaries, I'm not so sure now. Looking at the pencil line work above for instance there seems to be a less sure hand at work. It's either that or it was drawn super fast as a lot of the lines don't connect or feel kind of wavy, not nearly as fluid as some of the other pencil under drawing work that I've seen. Again, because of super hectic animation schedules or less experienced animators, I'll probably never know… Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 12:00 PM Comments[2] |
Mon, 6 October 2008 ![]() Well, I didn't get off my lazy butt for a Sunday post, but the world isn't ending because of it (there are so many blogs doing Halloween countdowns this year I think we can all stand to take a break for a day here and there.) This week I thought it would be fun to have my normal subject matter and the Halloween countdown converge with an entire week of animation cels from the Real Ghostbusters cartoon. I recently picked up a bunch of nice cels and have been talking about them in my regular Cartoon Commentary! column. So break out the proton pack, warm 'er up and get ready to bust some ghosts (or do something more creative like redecorating your house with the portable nuclear generator strapped to your back, or rescue some helpless kittens in trees by blasting them off the branches, it's up to you.) ![]() I picked up these first couple cels as a set. In this scene Peter Venkman and Egon Spengler are walking together. Now one of the things I love about going over these animation cels is trying to learn more about the process of making cartoons by studying the art and how it was put together. These cels raise the question of scene construction for me. Now I always assumed that a scene with multiple characters would be broken down into many layers of cels, each with one aspect of the scene painted on it. For this set of cels there's one for Egon, one for Peter, and I assume there was at least a background (and possibly another layer of background objects that might be moving.) On the other hand, I figured that if two of these aspects come into contact (outside of the background which is typically not on a cel, but rather a painting that the cels are shot on top of, or which are transposed onto later in the process) that they'd end up being painted onto the same cel. I've seen examples of this in cels available on eBay where characters grabbing each other, or layered on top of each other are on the same cel (in fact the cel that I'm going to share tomorrow has Ray and Winston together on the same layer.) Well since this set is in two layers, it makes me wonder why. My best guess is that one or both of the characters won't stay static for very long, so it would be easier to just paint that character again on a new cel to show the movement, and there would be less of a chance of screwing up and less work in general than having to paint both characters over again. ![]() ![]() Another aspect to this set that I found interesting are the pencils for Peter that I picked up along with the cels. The whole form that appears on the final painted cel isn't in the pencils. Again, this suggest to me that the animators used the body that was already drawn for the previous cel and just changed his head. This seems like a pretty standard way of saving on drawing time. What I'm curious about is how they merged the two sets of pencils (this head with the previous body) for photocopying onto the cel above. Since this drawing of Peter's head is still on a full sheet of paper and not cut out and pasted over the previous body drawing's head, how did they get the new final image? In the examples of this time saving practice that I've seen before, the new pencils are typically added to a photo copy of the previous drawing, which when copied onto the cel looks like one smooth set of line work. I guess the animators in Korea could have photocopied this drawing of Peter's head and pasted it over the other drawing. Again, it then raises the question of how they store their finished work when it's done and what sets of pencils to keep with what finished cels. Actually that's more of a nitpicky question that seems a bit too pointless to wonder about (unless I'm planning on getting a job collating for an Asian animation house.) ![]() These cels are a nice example of how not to over work one's self as an animator. Notice that Egon's right shoulder is missing the Ghostbuster's logo patch. Obviously there's no point in drawing it, and then wasting paint when the shoulder is just going to be covered up by Peter in the shot. Of course I wonder where it's best to draw the line on this sort of practice. I mean why not leave off most of Egon's right arm while you're at it? Seems sensible enough, though maybe the logistics of not finishing the drawing might make it a little more difficult or tricky to animate (like if the cels where laid down in the wrong order, there would be one weird looking armless Egon instead of him just missing his BG patch.) ![]() ![]() I do have to wonder why the producers and designers of this cartoon decided to make the characters so different, not only from the original movie, but between the various character designs. I suppose this was an extreme and early example of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles phenomenon where it would be easier for kids to tell the characters apart if they had their own color schemes, in particular with the hair colors. I always thought it was a very odd decision to make Egon tow-headed instead of having dark hair. Not only does it seem really out of place when comparing him to his real life counter part played by Harold Ramis, but it changes the characters possible Jewish ancestry to something more Nordic (or Jewish new wave/punk.) What's even weirder to me is that I never questioned it as a kid. Egon was Egon, and that was all there was to it. ![]() Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 1:26 PM Comments[1] |
Sat, 4 October 2008 ![]() Well, I decided to record a podcast about some of my movie watching this Halloween season, and hopefully I'll get it in just under the wire for day 4 of the countdown. It's about 25 minutes long, so it won’t melt your brains or anything, and for those of you brave enough to make it through the whole show there is a little treat at the end. I basically talk about two movies, The Abominable Snowman (the 1957 Hammer Yeti flick starring Peter Cushing and Forrest Tucker) and the 1972 Amicus adaptation of Tales From the Crypt (also starring Peter Cushing and a young Joan Collins.) Below are some screen captures of interest and the original movie posters. Enjoy! ![]() ![]() Above are stills of the amazing Peter Cushing, and Forrest Tucker (star of F-Troop and the 1975 Filmation Ghostbusters live action Saturday Morning show that I talked about some time back.) Below is an example of the surprising cinematography in the flick… ![]() I love how the Yeti were handled visually in the film. Subtle, but effective. ![]() Below, the awesomely creepy poster for the Amicus adaptation of Tales From the Crypt… ![]() Here we have some still from TFtC including our unsuspecting tour patrons, and the understated Ralph Richardson as the Crypt Keeper… ![]() Below we have some hints as to the dreadful fun that this flick contains… ![]() Hopefully I'll be back tomorrow with a look at a couple of the 80s horror flicks that I loved growing up. Comments[4] |
Fri, 3 October 2008 ![]() So how is everyone digging this years Halloween blogfest across the internets? I know I sure am. Seems like I'm bending the space/time continuum to do it, but I'm finding the time to both post and read a good bit of everyone else's posts as well. Here's to keeping up that pace (and since I'm playing with astrophysics, I'm going to take a crack at that sticky time travel issue that everyone seems to think is improbable…) For today's countdown post I'm going to do my last Halloween themed Peel Here column for the foreseeable future (as I'm running out of sticker fodder to post in general, and haven't found all that much in the Halloween-y vein to begin with.) It will be a beaut though as it's a huge set of Donruss baseball/monster-themed sticker cards from 1988 called Awesome! All*Stars… ![]() The copy of the set that I procured is actually from the Canadian subsidiary of Donruss, Leaf (which I hated while collecting Baseball Cards growing up since they seemed like counterfeit cards, no offense to my brethren from the great white north intended.) The set consists of 98 different sticker cards and 1 checklist card, which one of the biggest sticker card sets I've seen (much more in line with the other Donruss sets, the CHiPs and Zero Heroes sticker cards I talked about awhile ago.) For one thing, the whole set is made up of stickers instead of just having a smaller subset, but it's still over twice as large as anything that Topps has issued since the early 70s (even Garbage Pail Kids sets typically only contain 40 or so unique stickers.) Not only that but I have a theory that these are also all drawn/painted by the same artist, and I think I've even pin pointed his name, B.K. Taylor. Actually it was sort of a bit of kismet figuring this out as I have another separate item that I'm going to take about this month, a Monster joke book published in the late 80s that contains illustrations eerily similar to the work in this set (as well as having some baseball themed monsters that are pretty damn close to one of the characters in the set.) When I was researching him online I also stumbled upon a set of cards I'm positive he did called Odd Rods (in another odd coincidental bit of kismet, a reader of Branded asked me to help him identify this sticker card set this past month!) You can see more of Mr. Taylor's artwork here. I'm a pretty big fan of this style of goofy monster, a descendant of Big Daddy Ed Roth's Rat Fink… ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I was kind of excited while flipping through this set for the first time. These are set up in that G.P.K.-esque tradition of taking a name and combining it with an attribute to give the characters a little more personality, and for the first time that I can remember there was not only a "Shawn" card, but it was spelled like my name (and not like apparently every other Sean or Shaun out there.) Of course, this rare Shawn, is also Shawn the Sissy, a nail biting girly monster in a tutu (as you can see in the upper left below.) You can probably imagine my football-pulled-out-from-under-Charlie Brown-like scream of "AAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHH" when I came upon it. Sheesh. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The card backs were split two ways, with half of the set getting short little punny bios, and the other containing puzzle pieces to make a giant poster… ![]() Seriously, this set has a pretty big card back poster (at 28 cards, four rows of seven cards), though it's not quite as big as the CHiPs card back poster (which contained 66 card backs.) ![]() I was surprised that with a set this big there wasn't a ton of repeated jokes, though there was one instance that was pretty glaring in terms of repeating the funny… ![]() All in all I'm in love with these stickers and I kind of lament that I was "out of" sticker collecting by that point or I'd probably have been introduced to it decades earlier. So the rough plan for this month is to only post on weekdays, but I'm still toying with the idea of doing some spooky movie commentary on the weekends. We'll see how that goes, or in what form it might take… Category: Peel Here Volume 7 -- posted at: 11:00 AM Comments[10] |
Thu, 2 October 2008 ![]() So, ever since last year I've been keeping my eyes peeled for anything that seems to fall within the realm of Halloween-y goodness, particularly from the 80s. Last year one of the only things I managed to find from my favorite decade was a monster themed Muppets comic from a weird magazine-like children's book called Muppet Madness. I was curious at the time if the material in the book was culled from the run of Muppet Magazine, and I've since learned that it wasn’t as the magazine was published later on in the 80s. I lucked out and my good friend Kevin has had a copy of said magazine tucked away for the last 23 years, which he let me borrow for some site content… ![]() Well, even though there's nothing that really screams Halloween (in Jim Henson's Kermit voice as he shakes his head about in exasperation no less), but there is something that kind of qualifies. Since I'm going to talk a bit about the Real Ghostbusters cartoon this month (all next week so be prepared), I wanted to share this Muppets movie spoof comic called groaningly and punnily enough Grossbusters, written by one Jay Itzkowitz and illustrated lovingly by Jon McIntosh. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Honestly, I'm sort of surprised that Itzkowitz didn't make use of the Muppets own weird science wonders Bunsen and Beaker, who I think would have made an awesome addition to the spoof Grossbusters cast (especially instead of Rizzo and his pals on page 4 panel 3.) I did however think that Janice was a great stand-in as the Janine character. I also really dig that their Grossmobile was modeled off of the Muppets bus more than say the original Ghostbusters Ecto-1. Lastly, how about Gonzo really pushing that peanut butter & macaroni sandwich with a side of coleslaw joke? Man, he must have been storing that one up. Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 9:37 AM Comments[3] |
Wed, 1 October 2008 ![]() So, for this first day of October, and for the first official post of the Halloween countdown this year I thought I'd go over some of my pre-season shopping experiences at the usual suspects like Target, Wal-Mart, the Spirit Store, Spencer's, and Toys R Us. To tell the truth, I was looking forward to the seasonal macabre sections in these consumer megaplexes even more than usual this year, if nothing else to get my mind off of work. It didn't help that I was super excited to see what the various stores came up with this year as most of the stores had some great stuff last year (from mascots to candy and décor.) Unfortunately, it's beginning to seem like a bust (at least for my tastes) as most places don't really seem to be in the spirit and the one who are, seem to be a little bit lazy or schizophrenic about it. I think I just wanted the shopping experience to be way to splendiferously awesome that I've harshed my own mellow with expectation. The other aspect to perusing the Halloween-y store shelves this year that was sort of a downer was a weird crack down on inside-store photography. Granted, it's usually best to seek permission before walking into a place and snapping a bunch of pictures, but I'm more of the sneaky sneak when it comes to this sort of tradition. Well, all of the Halloween specialty stores in the area have started posting "No Photography" signs everywhere. As silly as this sounds, I can't help but think I contributed to this as I was "caught" in a couple places last year and almost but not quite grilled about my spooky store shutterbug hobby. Granted, I'm sure my antics don't hit on the radar of the big wigs at these places, but at the same time I know that a lot of these places are owned by the same companies (The Spirit stores are a Halloween liquidation front for Spencer's), so many a memo went around. Heck maybe a lot of bloggers have been caught snapping pictures of these fine institutions and it's becoming a concern. Who knows. At the end of the day it was sort of a bummer, though to be honest, there wasn't a whole lot to photograph. Basically the only two places that seemed to merit a little bit of photo archiving are Target and Toys R Us, and the latter isn't all that interesting as far as the in-store stuff. So practically all my photos this year are from Target, though I did go ahead and snap a picture of a new seasonal store called Halloween USA… ![]() Inside it was basically an exact replica of the Spirit store, though a little more spacious as it was housed in an old department store location. This place did have an advantage over the Spirit store in that they had a larger selection of props, general Halloween goofery, and décor, though this is a segment of holiday shopping that seems to be shrinking across the board. The Spirit store has almost entirely scaled back to pre-packaged costume sets, though they still have a decent (though somewhat stagnating) selection of costume props. I'm missing the lack of plastic/wood/ceramic skulls, fake torn-off limbs, little monster shaped baubles and the like though. Maybe stores like this require you take a break for a couple of years so as to not burn yourself out. I'm sticking to that thought… By far, and as in most years, my favorite showing was at the local area Targets. This year (like the previous) Target has decided to base their basic seasonal design around an already established property, Domo, which according to wiki is the mascot of the Japanese NHK television station. The character is apparently a "strange creature who hatched from an egg" (according to the official site), lives in a cave, passes gas when he's nervous or upset and doesn't like apples. Besides the fact that he looks like an adorable monster, I have no idea why Target decided to co-opt Domo for their Halloween advertising as there's noting spooky or really Halloween related about the lug. There are a ghost and a couple of bat characters in the Domo universe (you can visit all the characters here), but none of them are used in any of the Target marketing as far as I can see. Color me old and out of touch, but I just don't get it. He is cute though… ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() What's kind of weird about the Domo Halloween branding is that besides all of the signage and there is only a small endcap of Domo Halloween products. Everything else is covered in what I assume is Target specific Halloween branding, an evolution of their cute monster characters from years past. This is sort of what I was referring to as schizophrenic branding. Why go to all the trouble of securing the rights to Domo when the majority of your store branded merchandise features a completely different design campaign? They've also seemed to scale back on the Mexican Day of the Dead theme to a lot of past years products (like my beloved mariachi skeleton), focusing instead on the black laser cut metal baubles and faux statuary… ![]() They do have one heck of an awesome Day of the Dead skull Bucket, though it's so large that I have no earthly idea what I'd do with it. ![]() As far as their own character branding, it's pretty prevalent though out the department, and it even shows up on a bunch of name brand products like Bounty paper towels, Zip Loc sandwich bags, and Softsoap hand soaps. Again, it's kind of weird and unfocused. I assume if you aren't as anal about useless pop culture non-sense, you know, a normie, you wouldn't even realize there were a set of Target branded characters floating around out there… ![]() Most of the candy from previous years has shown back up on the shelves in new packaging like the large gummy tongue/vampire fang sets, the finger lollipops, and test tubes full of powdered or Halloween themed Runts-like candy… ![]() I was surprised to see a new section crammed in next to the candy though. Apparently Target is taking another shot at pushing the idea of a more personal family oriented Halloween celebration in the form of themed party games (in the past couple years they've been featuring more and more candy products that stray from the traditional fun-size neighborhood trick-or-treating fare, going for a more celebrate by yourself giant gummy frog type of deal.) ![]() As is now tradition, there was a whole new crop of Jones Soda products in a bevy of odd flavors to wet one's gullet. They've nixed the Gruesome Grape and Spiced Cider from the mini can line-up and added Spookiwi, and Buried Pomegranate. They've also dropped the jack-o-lantern theme to the can design and ushered in a awesome line of classic monster mugs. I’m especially fond of the werewolf design, though I can't stand their candy Corn flavored soda… ![]() ![]() As I mentioned above I was also very impressed with Toys R Us this year, though not for any great products or branding in the store. I'm surprised that they took their design aesthetic from last year with the super deformed, almost vinyl toy-looking, mascots and put it to a broader use. There was a ton of cheap toys and games with the fun looking trick-or-treat monster mascots. Here are scans of the main characters (there's also a cat and a Princess that aren't quite as cool): ![]() ![]() I was hoping to find the same sort of brand building at Wal-Mart this year after I fell in love with their Frankenstein's monster branding from last year, but instead they went in the total opposite direction packaging all over their stuff in horribly boring plain orange packaging. You couldn't make it look more generic and cheap. I didn't even bother dragging the camera into the joint as it was just too boring. Oh well. Hopefully I've gotten the ranting side of things out of the way for the rest of the month and now I can concentrate on looking back a couple decades into the Halloween-y stuff of the 80s. Tomorrow's post will echo a puppety one from last year that I enjoyed. See you in 24 hours or so… Category: Halloween 2008 -- posted at: 5:48 PM Comments[10] |
Wed, 1 October 2008 ![]() Oh my god, time is flying. I took an unofficial break from blogging this past month in the hopes of recharging my batteries (and giving a little more time for the day job which has been hectic) and getting ready for the Halloween season. Well it’s here way sooner than my internal clock expected. Anyway, here’s my up to the minute announcement of my month-long Halloween-y blog-a-thon dealy, or what ever you want to call it. I plan on keeping a weekday posting schedule, taking the weekends off to catch up or to possibly do some movie commentary podcasts (80s creepy flicks that I love, and no, not full commentaries, but just my thoughts on the flicks.) Also, as I mention in the podcast attached to this post, I’m going to try and concentrate on some 80s-esque Halloween fun for this year’s countdown. I’ve got some themed weeks planned coming up as well as some miscellaneous odds and ends. Hopefully it’ll be a blast. I’m going to try my darnedest to be back this evening for a more official post in this years countdown, so break out last years candy corn, dust off your formal-wear cape, dredge up that cackling witch laugh, and get ready for some spooky Branded fun! By the by, there are about 6 million others participating in this year’s Halloween blog craziness, and these are just a few (swiped with permission from the great John Rozum, feel free to pass it along!): All Eyes and Ears Azathoth's Abode on the Plateau of Leng Azathoth's Abode on the Plateau of Leng:The Dungeon Branded in the 80s Bubba Shelby Cavalcade of Awesome Cool-Mo-Dee Creepy Los Angeles Dave Lowe Design! Distinctly Jamaican Sounds Diversions of the Groovy Kind Dr. K's 100-Page Super Spectacular Dr. Squids Smorgasbord of Terror Drunken Severed Head Frankensteinia Franklin Mint Halloween Addict Harvey's Midnight Hour The Holiday Queen The Horrors of it All Houses of Wax I-Mockery John Rozum Monster Crazy Monster Memories Monster Rally Monsters and More Mostly Ghostly Music From the Monster Movies 1950-69 Music You (Possibly) Won't Hear Anywhere Else Neato Coolville Negative Pleasure Nostalgia Factory A Nostalgic Halloween Oh the Horror Orange and Black Para Abnormal Plaid Stallions Plastic Pumpkins Pumpkin Hollow Pumpkinrot Random Acts of Geekery The Retropolitan (?!?) The Sexy Armpit Sweet Skulls 13 Visions Tikiranch Trixie's Treats Universal Horror Sounds Valhella Vinnie Ratolle's Records Weird Hollow Wonderful Wonderblog X Entertainment Comments[8] |
Fri, 29 August 2008 ![]() What a week. I never realized just how insane an office move could be. Even though the physical aspect is over, the residual ripples are still keeping me swamped. I do have to say that the step up in quality in the new office is great. 20 inch flat screen monitors on adjustable arms, hidden PC towers under the desks, so much better than the ancient set up we had before. Now if I can just find the time to blog. BLARGH! Anyway, the most exciting thing going on outside of crazy work moves is the coming Halloween season. I’m already seeing signs for the seasonal stores popping up, and Party City has already started rolling out its spread. I can’t wait to see what the Target displays look like this year, as well as beginning the hunt for interesting goodies. Can’t wait. In the interim here’s the first of a handful of Bravestarr animation cels from around 1987. I figured I should begin with the show’s namesake, Marshall Bravestarr himself… ![]() Bravestarr makes the end of the 80s cartoon era, at least in terms of shows that I remember fondly as a kid. For some reason it seemed like interesting shows dried up for a couple years as there didn’t seem to be that many shows that really entertained me. Of course this was also around the time that got into Metallica and started “acting more adult” as the ripe old age of 10. Anyway, Bravestarr also marks the end of an era for Filmation studios as it was their last big show before they closed their doors. When I was hunting for cels I couldn’t find that many of Bravestarr that featured a nice shot of his face, or a full body shot. The above cel was about the best I could find. I wasn’t sure what he was holding in the scene, but I’ve since found the episode and realized that it was some sort of canister with a rope coming out of it. ![]() One of the complaints I’ve heard about the quality of the Bravestarr cartoon is actually one of the aspects that I love the most, the sketchiness of the black line work. The cartoon feels very rough around the edges this way but I think it adds both character and enhances the western feel of the show. ![]() Category: Bravestarr Cartoon Commentary -- posted at: 2:34 PM Comments[2] |
Thu, 21 August 2008 ![]() Today's Cartoon Commentary! is going to be a quick one as I'm so busy at work I feel like I need an extra set of legs so that I can run in two directions at once. This cel is another from the She-Ra: Princess of Power cartoon (circa 1985-86) and features one of the Horde Troopers on his wonderous flying machine. I originally picked up this cel to showcase an example of a more rigid technological item instead of the more common fluid character cels. ![]() What I found really interesting about this is that even though vehicles like this come off very straight-edged and technically perfect, when you get close up to the image you can see that it's not quite so. Some of the line work looks like it was done by hand instead of with rulers and stuff, though I don't have the pencil under drawing to see this for sure. Because it looks like it was mostly drawn free hand I can only imagine how much of a headache this could be while animating, trying to match up all the little parallel lines and connections between the metal plates and stuff. Maddening actually. ![]() Next week, less stress at work (laugh) and some cels from Bravestarr! Category: She-Ra Cartoon Commentary -- posted at: 10:44 AM Comments[3] |
Tue, 19 August 2008 ![]() It's been forever and a day since I saw the movie that the stickers below are merchandised off of, so all I have to go on when it comes to Baby: Secret of the Lost Legend are some vague happy memories of watching the sort of realistic dinosaurs and only partially making the connection that they were being saved by non other than the greatest American hero himself, William Katt. ![]() Though typically I'm a proponent of practical effect over CGI, I have to say that looking back at these Topps sticker cards from 1985 I think I would have a difficult time coming to the defense of the effects in the film. The baby brontosaurus looks just side of papier-mâché or perhaps a piñata as far as quality goes and I'm sure it must have been difficult for Katt and Sean Young (who play's Katt's wife) to try and act alongside it. When I look back on films that put actors in similar situations like E.T., Short Circuit, Gremlins, Spacecamp, and heck even Critters, I don't see the same issues. Maybe there needs to be a size limitation on the animatronic acting counterpart or something, I don't know. You can tell the production team had their hearts in the right place though and maybe just overreached their limitations a bit after the blockbuster success of flicks like Star Wars. ![]() One thing I'm really not fond of is how the designers of the DVD packaging for this flick are trying to rip off Jurassic Park (as you can see here in the new logo.) It's like reverse timely vampiric marketing. ![]() Looking back on it I'm not exactly surprised that this flick had an entire card and sticker set merchandised off of it, I'm actually surprised that there weren't more products since typically toy lines and such are developed in advance so they can be ready in stores after a film's release. I guess either the producers weren't sure about the marketing, or the various companies bidding for the property weren't interested. ![]() These sticker cards are pretty standard fare interms of Topps film merchandising output over the 80s. 11 stickers and one cardback puzzle. Category: Peel Here Volume 7 -- posted at: 10:13 AM Comments[5] |
Fri, 15 August 2008 ![]() I feel like I'm so behind in keeping a regular posting schedule around here. My day job is sapping so much of my time lately, and yeah, blah, blah, blah I know no one wants to read about my day job woes. Anyway, there is a bright light on the horizon though as things are starting to fit into place and are getting back to normal (which means a regular schedule and routine), so hopefully I'll be back to normal soon. In the mean time, here is another edition of Cartoon Commentary!, and yet another piece from my 80s animation cel collection. This week I'm going to take another look at a cel from the Filmation He-Man and the Masters of the Universe cartoon, circa 1984-85. This one features another one of my favorite characters, Battle Cat, the alter ego of Cringer and steed/side kick to the muscled man himself, He-Man. ![]() I think when it comes to Masters of the Universe I tend to fall in love with characters based on their design more than their personality per-se. So as far as design goes, I really dig Battle Cat, in particular his gnarly helmet/mask, which highlights his almost serpentine yellow eyes. I also love that the toy and cartoon designers managed to use the red and green color scheme without evoking even a lick of Christmas, which I have to say seems almost an impossible feat. As far as personality goes, I like that they managed to turn give the Scooby Doo archetype a bit of a twist with his transformation from the meek fraidy cat Cringer into the bold and gruff Battle Cat. Also, I managed to get a more overall scan of the cel this time so the production notes are included at the bottom (like I've mentioned, my scanner isn't all that big.) I haven't managed to decode all of the notes yet, but I do know that the MU-92 refers to Masters of the Universe episode #92. I'm not positive but I think that this cel is part of a sequence in which Battle Cat is about to leap up, and not the play bow that it appears to be. Here's a closer view of the cropped image… ![]() There isn't a whole lot to learn from this cel and its pencil under drawing. The one thing I did notice that is kind of interesting is in the pencil drawing. The animator made sure to color in a couple areas in Battle Cat's mouth, I'm assuming to show the final ink & paint artist where there would some color variation in that area. You can see that whoever painted this cel could have misinterpreted the area to the right of Battle Cat's teeth as another place to paint in a darker red as it appears to be colored in like the area to the left, but upon closer inspection this is just where some of the blue pencil lines came close together. I can see where it would be easy to miss-color something in the painting process, and again where Filmation benefits from having it all done in house where the communication would be better. ![]() I have one more cel, from She-Ra, to share next week before I move on to another Filmation cartoon that I loved growing up, Bravestarr. Category: He-Man Cartoon Commentary -- posted at: 10:55 AM Comments[3] |
Thu, 14 August 2008 From time to time I get solicited for reviews by marketing firms representing companies with DVDs or CDs that they want to get the word out on. Typically these are targeted pretty well, at least in terms of my interests and what not, so I accept and do my best to write and honest review of the product in question. Lately though I've noticed an increasing trend where these companies want me to pimp products that either don't hit on my interests all that well or they want me to blindly "review" a product or service, which basically means that I don't get a chance to really play with the item in question (they either don't supply a review copy or it's a truncated version. Well, here's where the above mini rant comes in. Because companies are becoming stingier and stinger as far as providing review copies, it makes the job of pimping their product very difficult. Basically EMI sent me the barest of bones versions of both albums, which are for all intents and purposes burned copies of the music on CD with almost plain white packaging (they had small photocopied versions of the album covers, but that's about it.) None of the actual packaging is included, so I'm left with only the music (and a bonus DVD that came with the Blondie album), which affirms my fear that I have to find something original to say about these albums. Category: Music -- posted at: 10:23 AM Comments[3] |
Mon, 11 August 2008 ![]() There really are millions of ways to waste time on the internet. The above is time killer number 1,762,543, or as I like to refer to it, my recent productivity in 1,000 words, or how I came to realize that I’ve been using the word ‘cel’ a lot lately… This time waster brought to you by Wordle, which I stumbled upon while reading the exquisite Frankensteinia this evening… Category: general -- posted at: 10:04 PM Comments[1] |
Tue, 5 August 2008 ![]() I figured since I started sharing my animation cel collection last week with an Orko Cel from He-Man and the Masters of the Universe (the 1st cel I broke down and purchased for the collection), I thought I'd stick with posting Filmation cels for a bit. Also, I wanted to mention again that because my scanner is relatively small (8"x12") I can't get a good scan of the entire cel and have decided instead of crop the image so that only the painted image is in frame. I'm trying to include the production notes at the bottom of the cel when I can, but it doesn’t always work out. What I need to do is also include a photo of the full cel, which I'm working on (my camera is on the fritz at the moment), but it might take a bit. Anyway, this week I thought I'd share a cel from the sister show/spin-off of He-Man, She-Ra Princess of Power. Though I never really watched it when it originally ran I've become a pretty big fan of the show in recent years as there are some interesting plot change-ups when compared to He-Man, a cartoon that I loved growing up. I always figured that She-Ra was just a version of He-Man for girls, and though to an extent it's exactly that, the premise isn't quite the same. The most marked difference is in the power struggle between She-Ra and her arch nemesis Hordak, and the fact that Hordak is in control of the fantastical land of Etheria with She-Ra leading a band of freedom fighters to try and liberate the populace. Whereas on MOTU where King Randor was in control of Eternia and Skeletor was always attempting to usurp that power, constantly being derailed by He-Man and his friends. The She-Ra cartoon comes off a lot darker and seems as if it takes more cues from the original Star Wars trilogy than any of the barbarian/sword & sorcery epics that informed He-Man. Again, since I shared a cel featuring Orko last week I thought I'd share a character from the She-Ra cartoon that is sort of his counterpart, Loo-Kee, circa 1985. Well, actually, the She-Ra 'Orko' would actually be Madame Razz, a bumbling witch who knows She-Ra/Adora's secret much in the same way that Orko knows Prince Adam is really He-Man, but Loo-Kee also shares some similar characteristics to Orko… ![]() Basically Loo-Kee was a character that was hidden in the background of each episode. He'd appear before the end credits and ask the viewers if they managed to find him (in a very Where's Waldo sort of way), and then he'd proceed to give the moral of the episode. I think this is sort of an interesting way to change up the moral-giving aspect of 80s cartoons as it's now coming from an outside source and can be taken a little bit more as commentary instead of a direct lesson from one of the main characters. I do believe he ends up mixing with the main cast in a couple of episodes, but for the most part he's sort of outside the plot and it more of a figure head for the show, much like how Orko seems to figure in as a representative icon for the MOTU cartoon. He's also a smaller, almost comic relief type of character, again much like Orko, so I kind of consider him a partial counterpart. Anyway, as far as the cel itself goes, I was really happy with this one. The painting is on the large size, taking up a good portion of the cell (about 6.5" square) and it's really colorful. See color is another draw, at least for me, with animation cels. Since the cels tend to only have one character or item on them, and since they are typically mostly clear negative space for other cels to lay on top or show through, I find it really cool when the image is striking or vivid. Loo-Kee was made to be just this as his desing works in practically ever color in the rainbow (except orange and purple, though orange is sort of implied in his skin tone.) So having the image on the large side and colorful really makes this cel pop. I even like the depressed, sort of scared expression on the character's face as it's an emotion you don't typically get from him, sort of like an enraged He-Man cel would be. There's also very little paint damage, just a few specks of missing paint on his coveralls here and there. The black linework can out mostly crisp as well in this cel, so it doesn't end up looking too sketchy or like a bad photocopy. ![]() Something I meant to point out in the last CC! is the quality of work Filmation did with it's cartoons. Now I'm pretty much talking out of my ass here as I really don't know all the ins and outs of the animation process, but from what I can gather just by examining the cels in my collection, the Filmation cels all seem have a little bit more going on in the quality department. For instance, when looking at the back of the cels where the paint was actually applied, you can see that almost none of the black line work shows through the paint. Typically I wouldn't claim a paint's opaqueness as a mark of quality, but when I was thinking about some of the other cels I have and how you can very clearly see the line work through the paint on the back it occurred to me that you might have areas when paint overlaps that might be discolored because the last color applied might filter through the other layers of paint. This certainly seems like a quality issue to me. Also, all of the Filmation cels that I own are larger (11"x14") than most of the other cartoons I've seen so far (which range from 8.5"x11" to 9"x12".) Again, not that size equals quality, but it does free up the artists to work in a little more detail or play around with layout a bit more. I have to assume this is because Filmation was almost entirely animated in-house as opposed to outsourcing the cel production work. From all of the special features I've watched included in the sets released by BCI: Ink & Paint, Filmation really does come off as a studio that cared a great deal about quality. It"s funny, people tend to point fingers at Filmation for re-using animation sequences, but by doing so they could afford to keep the whole production together which meant that coordination and communication between departments putting a show together were always the best they could possibly be. Not that this is something visible from the cel above, but you could also see this in the various series they worked on as there really weren't that many obvious animation errors like miss-colored characters or unevenly photographed cels, again because of the fact that it was all done in-house. ![]() As far as the pencil under drawing for this Loo-Kee cel goes, there isn't all that much to comment on. I thought it was interesting that the animator took the extra couple of seconds to fill in his eyebrows and pupils as it seems like an extra step that's not needed considering the final cel will have to have these areas filling in or touched up in black paint. Granted it's not a large area of black fill in the pencils, but when you compare it to the Orko pencil drawing I shared last week, you can see that they didn't bother to color in either the 'O' on his cloak or the shadow under his hat where his eyes peek out. Next week I'll have another CC! featuring yet another animation cel from Filmation… Category: She-Ra Cartoon Commentary -- posted at: 9:34 AM Comments[7] |
Mon, 4 August 2008 ![]() I thought I'd take a second and both throw out a shout to a really fun contest that the Art & Story podcast (hosted by Jerzy Drozd and Mark Rudolph of Sugary Serials) is running as well as posting my entry. I don't typically dabble all that much in sequential art, but the idea was too much fun not to try. Basically the contest is a variation on a project that Jerzy, his wife Anne and Mark have called 12/12 (details are located here) where they randomly pick 3 newspaper headlines and three items and then they try and hammer out a six-panel comic working it all together. If the concept sounds interesting, check out the Art & Story podcast, listen to a couple episodes (in particular this episode which details the 12/12 project) and then take a crack at making a comic yourself. The winning submission will be drawn randomly from all received and will be rewarded with a jackpot of fun comics including everything Jerzy and Mark have published (that they have in print) and a bunch of comics culled from the quarter bins during this past Wizard World Chicago (I was there during the hunt and there are some choice items for sure.) Anyway, here is my submission. Can you guess which items and headlines I had to work with (from this posted list?) ![]() Category: general -- posted at: 6:59 PM Comments[0] |
Mon, 4 August 2008 ![]() I just wanted to take a second and mention that copies of the 2nd Branded in the 80s magazine, the special Micro-Magazine edition that I did specifically for Wizard World Chicago this year are now available for purchase online (as well as copies of the longer 1st issue.) Just click on the picture of the books above, or at the top left of the page to order them through Indy Planet. The micro-mag is only 8 pages long, but contains an exclusive (yeah I know, goofy isn't it) article on Choose Your Own Adventure style books from the 70s and 80s. All magazine purchases go directly to the upkeep of this site, so if you're interested in supporting the Branded in the 80s project, by all means pick a copy of the books. I thought I'd also take a second to mention that there are a few comic shops now carrying copies of Branded in the 80s: A Comic Shop 114 South Semoran Blvd. Winter Park, FL 32792 (407) 332-9636 (I talked to the owner and one of the guys who works in the shop and they seem like some really great people. The shop is really nice and they stock some great stuff.) Titan Games and Comics (Duluth, GA location) 2131 Pleasant Hill Road Duluth, GA 30096 (770) 497-0202 (This has been one of my local shops since I moved to GA back in '90, a mainstay.) Criminal Records 466 Moreland Ave, NE Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 215-9511 (Great music and comic shop in the Little Five area of Atlanta, right next to Junkman's Daughter.) Bizarro Wuxtry 197 E. Clayton Street Athens, Georgia 30601 (This is an awesome store in Athens run by the equally as awesome Devlin Thompson featuring all sorts of comics, magazines, books, toys, ephemera, and nostalgia goodness. I can't leave this place without dropping a bundle on stuff...) Anyway, ending self-pimping transmission… Category: general -- posted at: 2:16 PM Comments[0] |
Thu, 31 July 2008
Recently I began thinking about how I want to 'collect' and remember the cartoons I loved as a kid. I have a few goals as far as a collection goes, and since I have some silly issues about buying up old toys and stuff off of eBay I've mainly been focusing on picking up whatever I can on DVD. My original goal was to get at least one episode from every show on DVD, but as the format changed and season boxsets became first the rage, and then affordable, I've been focusing on those. Category: He-Man Cartoon Commentary -- posted at: 11:18 AM Comments[5] |
Wed, 30 July 2008 ![]() Finally got a chance to post again, the day job has been sapping my strength. I thought I was going to post a follow up to the Mr. T sticker book from the last Peel Here, but I just caught something on eBay that I want to post with the follow up, so it'll have to wait. Lets just say it involves crayons that smell like chocolate. Anyway, for this week I thought I'd do a quickie. Here's a package of Inspector Gadget puffy stickers from 1983 (by Gordy International.) ![]() Back of the package… ![]() Gordy was the same company that brought us a million other puffy stickers like the Silverhawks, Mr. T (from the cartoon), and the Real Ghostbusters. If all the puffy sticker companies I think I dig Gordy's work the most because the guys and gals they had designing them added an extra little bit of flair, typically in the form of a colored geometric shape that helps the characters really pop on the stickers. Other companies try for more basic designs with just artwork or pictures that are closely cropped. Granted the overall Gordy sticker lacks the nice little accent of being shaped roughly like the character it's depicting, but oh well. I haven't been able to locate any additional Inspector Gadget puffy sticker packages, but Gordy also tended to release these in sets of four or five, so I'm betting there are some other designs floating around out there, hopefully with stickers featuring Chief Quimby, Dr. Claw, Claw's cat, Gadgets car, and possibly a M.A.D. agent or two. At least I'd like to think so. As far as the show itself goes, I was smitten from the first time I heard Don Adams voice. I was a pretty big fan of Get Smart as it was playing in heavy syndicated rotation on Nick at Night while I was growing up, and I'm sure to my adolescent mind I just figured that Inspector Gadget was a cartoon spin-off, sort of like a reverse to the whole Pink Panther craze. Of course it didn’t hurt that IG was also played in heavy rotation on Nickelodeon, which was my fall back channel of choice since they concentrated on kid-friendly content for most of the day. If there were no shows on like He-Man, G.I. Joe, or the Transformers, I was always flipping to Nick to see if I could catch an episode of Inspector Gadget, Danger Mouse, or Count Duckula. Besides Don Adams, I loved a lot of the conventions of the IG cartoon, from the self-destructing notes of Chief Quimby to the crafty way the producers and writers decided never to reveal what Gadget's arch nemesis Dr. Claw really looked like (all you ever got to see what his gnarly looking gloved fist pounding on the arm of his chair.) I also loved and coveted Penny's (Gadget's niece) electronic book that she invariably used to uncover the schemes of Dr. Claw and his M.A.D. agents. Now that I'm thinking about it, I think Inspector Gadget was one of the first 80s cartoon properties to be re-imagined into a live action flick (at least later on down the road and not at-the-time like the ill fated He-Man flick.) I guess like all his gadgets, he was way ahead of the curve on bumbling pointlessness in terms of becoming a live action parody of itself. Sigh. Next time, hopefully, there will be some 25 year-old chocolaty scented goodness, but we shall see… Category: Peel Here Volume 7 -- posted at: 7:30 PM Comments[6] |
Fri, 25 July 2008 ![]() So I know I've mentioned the Sugary Serials comic anthology before, but I thought I'd take a second to point to it again. Basically the anthology is build around the concept of all ages comics influenced by the dynamics and feel of Saturday morning cartoons. There is already a huge variety of stories available in their archive (they've been going for almost a year now.) One of the more recent stories that I've been enjoying the heck out of it called Switch Runners by Mark Rudolph and Jerzy Drozd… ![]() Mark and Jerzy decided it would be a fun challenge to try and design a comic based on a fictitious story/toy pitch much like the 80s properties G.I. Joe, He-Man and the Masters of the Universe, Transformers, etc. They wanted to push themselves a bit out of their comfort zone by molding the idea around a vehicle-based toy line, trying to make the story a bit more interesting than shows like M.A.S.K. Personally I think they succeeded in spades, creating a really vivid set of characters that are both influenced by 80s action cartoons and yet still feel new and interesting. They did some swell work on the vehicle designs as well, putting together a concept that I know I would have been salivating over as a kid (basically all the heroes vehicles have 2 modes, one built for transportation/speed, and a second built for artillery and defense, which basically grounds the thing.) The basic story line revolves around a group of space explorers who are drawn to a strange planet ruled by an evil being called Tritannus (he uses emergency beacons to draw unsuspecting aliens to his planet so that he can enslave them.) The explorers end up crashing into one of the planets moons (which happens to contain a natural element that is a major source of Tritannus' power), brining their ship and a portion of the moon cascading down to the planets surface. The explorers salvage as much from their destroyed ship as they can to built a new set of vehicles (with the help of the element from the chunk of moon they brought down with them) and a base while they try and figure out a way to fend off the attacks from Tritannus (who wants to reclaim the moon fragment to regain his full power) and find a way off the planet. ![]() There are shades of all sorts of 80s cartoons and other kid's shows within the story and influences on the character designs (from Thundercats and M.A.S.K., to Bravestarr and the Muppet Show), but the world does not feel recycled in the least (it could totally hold it's own on the DVD shelf next to Voltron and the Silverhawks.) It's also very natural in its influences and doesn't resort to overt or snarky cartoon references, which seem to be about as far as most 80s influenced contemporary cartoons go. That's something that I enjoy about the anthology in general… ![]() The team of heroes consists of five characters led by a slightly frustrated Ramp (who bears an intentional striking resemblance to Tom Selleck), and includes the distant Anchor (in the first picture above), the lively Talika, enthusiastic Rondo, and the hard nosed Farz (the redhead driving the vehicle Dispatcher above.) As far as the villains go, they're a little stronger in number (with six), including Cyndrl (a creature of fire housed in a containment suit who talks in excited run-on sentences), Crass Reptillicus (the narcissistic know-it-all) and his admirer Shila (who is equal parts lovely lady and Baby Huey in a powerhouse of a dinosaur body)… ![]() …as well as Tackle (a scheming half rock, half robot cyborg) and Terzo (the ex of Anchor and a turncoat traitor to boot.) ![]() As I mentioned above, a screeching power hungry trio of aliens that combine to form the mighty Tritannus leads the villains… ![]() The comic is still updating on the Sugary Serials site (it's up to page 11 as I type this), so if you have a second and enjoy 80s action adventure cartoons you might want to give it a try (as well as the rest of the comics in the anthology), you won't be sorry you did. I can almost hear the 80s hair metal influenced theme music in my head as I read each page… Category: general -- posted at: 2:32 PM Comments[0] |
Thu, 24 July 2008 Though I don't think I've mentioned it here on the site all that much, I'm sort of going through a period of being utterly obsessed with buying toys again. I wish I could say they were vintage, but I haven't quite gotten over that hump yet (of owning other kids once cherished action figures and vehicles.) No I've been totally sucked into the hysteria that is the 25th Anniversary line of G.I. Joe figures that Hasbro has been releasing. It started about a year ago around this time when the first waves of figures were hitting toy shelves around the country. Now for the most part I've managed to suppress the itch to buy a ton of action figures in general because I'd both go broke and run out of room in the living domicile (not to mention putting a strain on my marriage most likely), and when the news first hit about these new G.I. Joe figures I thought I'd end up looking but not buying. At first I was only aware of a couple of 5-pack sets that were being released (one Cobra, on Joe team members), and though the sculpts on the figures looked really cool, I didn't really like the packaging and thus felt I'd be able to fight the urge to buy. Then the single carded figures started to hit stores, and the packaging design was like a sledgehammer to the gut. Hasbro decided to go with a very similar look to their original card layout and art designs, close enough that I couldn't fight the nostalgic feelings welling up inside and I bought in. The next thing I knew it was a year later and I've picked up almost every figure in the line so far. I have them neatly arranged in rows on the wall by my computer desk sort of recreating the look of the back of the packages (with the pictures of the available figures in rows.) Anyway, to get to the meat of why I'm posting about this, Hasbro recently announced the remainder of the line-up of figures expected to hit stores this year and toward the end of the list was a curious entry, a figure named Specialist Trakker. Now this wasn't a Joe or Cobra figure, at least not from what I remember of the figures available in the original line, and the spelling on Trakker seemed to point to a character from another toy line in the 80s. The fan community was mildly abuzz about who it might be, and people like me were keeping their fingers crossed that it might just be a 3.75" version of Matt Trakker from the cartoon and toy line M.A.S.K. It did sort of seem crazy though, I mean why would Hasbro intermix 20 odd year-old toy lines even if they did own the rights to both? We never saw G.I. Joe vs. Transformers toys (though there was a comic book series.) Well, I received an e-mail from my friend HooveR this morning with some links to the HissTank.com site with some pictures of the Hasbro booth from the San Diego Comic Con, and finally I have pictorial confirmation that there indeed will be at least one new M.A.S.K. figure coming to toy shelves this year… ![]() ![]() To say that I'm excited about this upcoming 2 ounces of plastic bliss is a bit of an understatement. Not only does the figure look awesome, but Hasbro has done a great job once again of throwing the fans a bone by including a small M.A.S.K. logo on the packaging, and not just forcing the character into the G.I. Joe line. The idiotic demon-nerd inside of me kind of wishes the overall card art reflected the feel of the M.A.S.K. packaging from the 80s, but honestly, I'm not enough of a stickler really care all that much. My hope now is that we get a chance to see a few more characters from M.A.S.K. show up in future G.I. Joe lines, in particular Bad Turner and Miles Mayhem (who were my favorites.) Many thanks go out to Hisstank.com for getting out the scoop on the new Joe figures introduced at the SDCC… Category: Toys -- posted at: 1:26 PM Comments[0] |
Tue, 22 July 2008
Oh yeah, I also mention the Art & Story podcast with Jerzy Drozd and Mark Rudolph, but I forgot to give a link to their show in the episode, so here it is! Comments[1] |
Mon, 21 July 2008 Recently Time Life announced that they would be releasing the complete Real Ghostbusters Cartoon on DVD sometime this fall (including the later re-named version Slimer and the Real Ghostbusters.) On the one hand it's pretty cool that all 140 odd episodes of the show are finally coming out on DVD (instead of those annoying 4-episode discs that came out a couple years ago), but on the other, the set being released is sort of a behemoth, the type of DVD release that could very easily hit shelves with an astronomical MSRP, not get purchased, and then find it's way quickly to out-of-print DVD hell. Personally I'm not a fan of complete series sets, unless of course the show in question only lasted a couple seasons. Typically they're released after all of the individual seasons have come out and for folks like me that pick them up bit by bit, the complete set is pointless. What's worse is that these sometimes come with the best special features (as in the case of Seinfeld which came with a nice coffee table book put together by Jerry and the producers of the show which is only available with the complete set.) Also, there's that whole pesky price issue. Who wants to drop over a hundred dollars on a set of DVDs, no matter how much material is on them? It took me forever and a day to convince myself that it was worth dropping $80 on the complete Monty Python set (a show that I adore), and that was after it had been out for years and the price slashed in half. I don't mind paying this much in the long run, it's just the all-at-once deal that really gets on my nerves... **Update** Well, apparently I was being way to conservative with my $130 estimate on the complete series. TVshowsonDVD.com just updated with the release date, price and extras on this set and it's going to clock in at an ungodly $179! Again, I ask, who has 2 bills to drop on an 80s cartoon series all at once? Oh, and you have to purchase it thorough Time Life much the way they held the Muppets hostage for so many years. Ug. This coveted, yet overpriced, set drops on November 15th... The reason for this post is to point to a news story on TVshowsonDVD.com, which give fans the opportunity to vote on possible cover artwork for the complete series set. There are two possible choices, both of which will probably feature some sort of lenticular motion action scenes on the outer slipcase. Personally my favorite of the two is the simpler art featuring the gang against a flat black background with a lenticular slime effect at the top of the box… Category: Cartoons -- posted at: 2:54 PM Comments[6] |
Thu, 17 July 2008
From what I can gather there were at least 10 other Antioch sticker/story books available (other than what I've shared on the blog that is) including 2 Garfield books, 2 Mr. Byte Presents books (which centered on early 80s computing), a couple WWF wrestling books (Hulk Hogan Wins the Belt and one for the cartoon Hulk Hogan's Rock 'n' Wrestling), a couple that centered around the 80s BMX and skateboarding craze, and two more in the series I'm going to share today which centers on the Mr. T cartoon… I guess it's just the Ruby Spears touch as they were also responsible for the Rambo cartoon which is another perfect example of taking a concept that was way more for the adults and trying to shoehorn it into a cartoon for kids. The silliest thing is that I still watched the show whenever I'd catch it on USA's Cartoon Express (along with another Ruby Spears produced favorite of mine, Turbo Teen.) Category: Peel Here Volume 7 -- posted at: 10:53 AM Comments[7] |
Wed, 16 July 2008 Though Warner Brothers announced this a couple months ago, I thought I'd go ahead and post the news about the impending release of the Silverhawks cartoon on DVD, October 14th later this year…
Category: Cartoons -- posted at: 9:52 AM Comments[2] |
Wed, 9 July 2008 ![]() It just occurred to me that it's been weeks since I posted a new Peel Here column. I guess this past vacation has really got me turned around as I'm still sort of lost on what day it is. I thought I'd tie in this week's stickers to the WW: Chicago experience a bit, though very loosely. One of the bits of fun I had at the show was taking a break from the table on the last day to hunt through some quarter bins with Jerzy Drozd looking for both some fun stuff to eventually share on the site as well as catching me up with some comics that I missed out on back when I was heavily collecting and only had eyes for the various X titles (X-Men, X-Factor, New Mutants, etc.) I rewarded with a stack of Walt Simonson books (bits and pieces of his runs on both Thor and the Fantastic Four) as well as a handful of 80s toy and cartoon-centric comics (like M.A.S.K., G.I. Joe, He-Man, and a few issues of the Spiral Zone), but one that I was really curious about was the Saga of Crystar the Crystal Warrior. I think the reason these jumped out at me in the bins is because I found a sheet of Crystar stickers awhile ago when I was first starting up the Peel Here column and to be honest, it's an 80s property that I don't know all that much about. It's probably because of the fact that there wasn't a cartoon associated with the brand; instead Crystar was developed by Marvel comics so that they could license the brand to a toy company, essentially reversing the normal process of brand marketing (at least as far as 80s toy and cartoon lines were concerned.) Since the comic debuted in '83 and the toyline (which Marvel managed to get Remco to pick up) the year before, I think I was too young to really glom onto it considering I was still a few years off of really discovering comics and I really only had eyes for Star Wars at this point. I'm not sure how much Marvel attempted to merchandise the property, but as I mentioned above, it at least made it into the realm of stickers… ![]() Again, I'm pretty unfamiliar with the world of Crystar, but after flipping though the two issues I found in Chicago and reading up on the story via its Wiki entry I'm intrigued. Though the story seems to be centered on the age-old concept of two princes taking opposing sides to conquer/save a fantastical world, there are still some really fun elements to the plot. For one, each prince chooses (or in Crystar's case is forced) an element to wrap their battle around; Crystar is wounded and is turned into a crystal like material to save his life, while his brother Moltar allies himself with a demon lord and is turned into a lava form. There also seems to be a rich back-story behind two of the lower tier characters, Warbow (who I believe is the green crystal warrior in the sticker set above) and an evil wizard who both shoot the other's left eye out with arrows. I can't explain it, but I find bits of character data like that fascinating. I'm not sure if this is the only set of Crystar stickers or if their might be a second page. From what I gather this page features mostly the good characters (fighting on the side of Order) including Crystar in the middle, Warbow in the upper right, Feldspar in the upper left (who is actually the uncle of both Moltar and Crystar and is a neutral character which explains his half lava, half crystal appearance), and Ogeode in the bottom right (who is the wizard responsible for turning the crystal warriors into their current mystical form.) I'm not sure of the lava dude on the bottom left is Moltar or just one of his lava minions (though judging from the cover to the first comic I'm guessing he is Moltar…) Anyway, I'm intrigued by the whole concept, so I guess this will be another comic title I'll have to add to the list for future quarter bin sessions… Category: Peel Here Volume 7 -- posted at: 9:07 AM Comments[8] |
Tue, 8 July 2008 ![]() I had such a great time taking the Branded in the 80s magazine on the road this summer that I figured one more stop on the tour couldn't hurt (and by extending the total stops to two it's starting to feel much more like I can actually call it a tour), so I wanted to take a second and announce that I'll be setting up a half table in the artist alley section of the Atlanta Comic Con this coming Sunday, the 13th of July. You can find information on the show at their website (admission is $5, though you can save 2 bucks if you print out a coupon from the site.) It's going to be held at the Marriott Atlanta Century Center located at 2000 Century Blvd, NE, Atlanta, GA, 30345 (404/325-0000) from 11:00am till 5:00pm. I thought I'd also take a second to mention that there are a few comic shops now carrying copies of Branded in the 80s: A Comic Shop 114 South Semoran Blvd. Winter Park, FL 32792 (407) 332-9636 (I talked to the owner and one of the guys who works in the shop and they seem like some really great people. The shop is really nice and they stock some great stuff.) Titan Games and Comics (Duluth, GA location) 2131 Pleasant Hill Road Duluth, GA 30096 (770) 497-0202 (This has been one of my local shops since I moved to GA back in '90, a mainstay.) And soon… Criminal Records 466 Moreland Ave, NE Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 215-9511 (Great music and comic shop in the Little Five area of Atlanta, right next to Junkman's Daughter.) Also, I wanted to say thanks to all of those who have picked up copies of the book online from the Indyplanet store! (You can order a copy by clicking on the picture of the magazines above or right here… End pimping the magazine transmission… Category: general -- posted at: 9:22 AM Comments[0] |
Mon, 7 July 2008 One of the things that I always look forward to on vacations out of town is tracking down new and interesting foodstuffs. Whether it's some local flavors that are new to me (as a fer'instance scoring some Cincinnati chili and Chicago-style deep dish pizza recently), or something that's even more exciting to my pop culture obsessed mind, new brand name product offerings (in particular new soda and snack flavors.) As I've mentioned on the site before we tend to visit Florida an awful lot and I am convinced that the Orlando area is a test market for some of the larger snack, soda, and candy companies. We always tend to find new stuff there, and it's always months (if ever) until we see this stuff filter up to Georgia. This past trip was no exception even though pickins were sort of slim. Besides finding some single bottles of the all-in-one A&W brand Root Beer Floats (which are only available in hideously expensive 4-packs here), the big score this time were a couple bags of very odd flavored Combos snack crackers. Now I say very odd, but only one of them was really weird, so I'll start with the more normal Cheeseburger variety… ![]() Now I grew up with some weird flavored snacks all my life, as there always seemed to be Snyder's brand chips in our area. Snyder's was the brand that had flavors like Steak & Onion, Meatball Pizza, and the almost normal Dill Pickle, so I'm familiar with the idea of savory beef-flavored snacks. The complexity of intermingled flavors that companies are trying to achieve with Cheeseburger these days though is a little more out of the ordinary. I first saw this last year when Doritos held their first mystery guess-the-flavor contest. The above bag of Combos has this zany flavor intermixed with the cheese filling and it tastes almost exactly like last year's Doritos did. The problem I see with this odd Cheeseburger flavor is that the food scientists aren't shooting for any one common cheeseburger flavor (like a creamy beef to simulate the burger and cheese), but practically every possible flavor you might have on a fully loaded burger. There are the obvious hints of cheese (as the filling is cheese-based, well at least a close approximation of a cheese-like substance) and a more subtle beefiness, but there are also strong hints of pickle, ketchup, and mustard, which end up skewing the overall taste towards a very tart place. All in all, it's not as much weird, as it seems to be a misfire, and would be better labeled as "Cheeseburger Condiment Flavored". The second new Combos flavor on the other hand (Bacon, Egg, & Cheese) is just downright evil in both concept and it’s all too accurate flavors… ![]() First off let me just say that snack crackers/chips should never, EVER, be egg flavored. There is a certain spoilability to the thought of eggs, though maybe it's just me. I've always been of the mind that eggs should be eaten fast (unless hard boiled, and even then it's certainly not a tempting idea for a snack chip flavor), and in small quantities, as they tend to get cold and sort of sickening the longer you leave them out. It probably doesn't help that bacon flavoring has always been something you'd typically find in either soup mixes or dog biscuits, and it just seems a little weird in chips (though I think Pringles has managed to pull it off in the past.) Personally, as they Combos are almost as bad for you as eating a Bacon, Egg, and Cheese biscuit, I would much rather just go ahead and eat one that a very disturbingly close flavored approximation of one in snack cracker form. I wonder if Jones soda will ever come out with a set of breakfast flavored sodas? If so, I hope they contact the food scientists working feverishly at the Combos Company because they certainly nailed the flavor… Category: Food -- posted at: 11:27 AM Comments[5] |
Mon, 7 July 2008 ![]() Alright, I'm still not convinced that this is the brightest idea I've ever had, but I recorded a podcast last night talking about some of my experiences during the 2008 Wizard World Chicago comic con. It's a little different than the normal Branded in the 80s podcasts as it's mired in the present and it's pretty freaking long (for me at least.) So be warned that it clocks in at just over an hour. Mainly I discuss how much WW surprised me in contrast to conventions that I'm more used to like Dragon con, as well as how easily (relatively) I was able to break out of my more normal introverted shell in the convention situation… ![]() Comments[7] |
Sat, 5 July 2008 Well, I'm finally back from vacation (both from a trip to Florida to visit the family, and from our exciting trip up to Wizard World Chicago), so I thought it was about time I update the site. It doesn't feel like two weeks have gone by, but then the wife and I did our best to pack each day with stuff so the time just flew by. The whole point of this vacation was to take the trek up to Chicago to both meet a bunch of people I'd been conversing with online as well as to debut the print edition of this very website, the Branded in the 80s magazine. So how did it go? Well, I figure I might as well start at the beginning and work my up to the meat of the post… The wife and I had originally planned on attending this year's San Diego Comic Con as a belated honeymoon, but after pricing out the trip and finding out that hotel rooms were pretty damn hard to come by, we opted instead to hit WW: Chicago. My sister was gracious enough to dump a bunch of her frequent flier miles on us, so the airfare was taken care of. Even though the cost wasn't a headache, the idea of flying in general was. I hadn't been on a plane since I was about 8 years-old, and certainly not in the post 911 climate. I took every single security check in horror story to heart and expected the worst, not to mention the whole fear of heights and freaky gremlins (the type that drove John Lithgow to near madness in the Twilight Zone movie.) I was pretty tense when we were dropped off at the Orlando International airport. Funny thing is that aside from a short wait to do the initial check-in (the signage was amply confusing), everything else went off without a hitch. Security check in was no big deal (aside from having to take my shoes off, but then again I tend toward laziness), and we ended up having about 40 minutes to sit around in the terminal waiting for the flight to start boarding. Here's a picture of our plane waiting on the tarmac… ![]() The flight itself was no big deal. It probably helped that I didn't have the window seat, so at most I could only get a glimpse of the horizon out of the window. The flight time seemed to slip by as well (it was admittedly a short flight at and hour and forty five minutes), though part of this had to do with Delta, as they had installed TVs in the backs of all the seating, so I had the Food Network to keep me company though most of the flight. We had a stop over/connection in Cincinnati, and then a much shorter flight (45 minutes) to Chicago on a smaller plane, but again it was pretty uneventful. My only other worry was catching a shuttle to our hotel in Chi town, but again, no big deal. In fact, I think part of me was looking forward to some kinks in the trip as we only every really drive down to Florida from Georgia which can get pretty routine and boring. Some snafus up to Chicago would only have reassured me that the trip was a little farther and more of a big deal. As it was when we stepped out of the airport in Illinois we didn't even really have that feeling that we were in a different place. The temperature was very similar (hot and humid the first day) and we hadn't really heard anyone talking so there were no local accents and flavors. At most there were a ton of Cubs displays in the airport, but I'm not a sports guy so again, it could have been Atlanta for all we knew. It didn't start feeling like a strange city until we hit the hotel (we stayed in the Sofitel because it was both close to the convention center were WW: Chicago was held, and because it was the only hotel that had rooms available for the entire weekend.) The Sofitel was a bit, shall we say ritzy compared to what we were used to (I grew up on Super 8s and Holiday Inns), and as a perfect example of this all of the staff spoke in French (French first and then English second, how utterly ritzy.) Actually, to add to the almost pretentious atmosphere in the place, there were HD TVs lining the wall above the Check-In desk that were playing old French black & white silent films. ![]() At the end of the day, even though the place was nice as hell, there were a lot of simple drawbacks that made it feel like it was grossly expensive. You had to pay for daily wifi service, local calls, and way too much to get a mini fridge in your room (I've never had to pay to get a mini fridge in a hotel room before.) There were also pointless amenities in the room like an HDTV with no HD channels, so everything looked like piss poor quality. It was however connected to the convention center via a very convenient sky bridge, so it gets some points there. The con was held at the Donald E. Stephens Convention Center in Rosemont, which was by far the best comic convention experience I've ever had. I've been going to Dragon Con here in Atlanta since I was a junior in high school and it's always been a headache of multiple hotels and con floors that were sometimes 2 to 3 blocks apart. At Wizard World though, everything was in the same building, which for convenience's sake was much appreciated. ![]() Wizard World was also about 2 to 3 times larger as far as the floor and attendance goes, so it's the largest convention I've ever attended. Of course, considering that I was exhibiting for the first time ever, I didn't really get a chance to get wrapped up in the experience like I used to back in my Dragon Con days. I was expecting to see throngs of humanity and insane lines for everything (which was certainly the case for every Dragon Con I've ever attended), but with the exception of the line to get in on Saturday morning it seemed like quite the opposite. ![]() (The line to get in on Saturday) When my wife and I first walked into the convention center lobby and we saw the two areas for attendees to buy tickets and sign up we were shocked. Not only was there one on waiting in line, but bother area were planted right next to the entrance to the actual con floor. In my experience, there is usually a registration area on a completely different floor (if not in a separate building) to house the thousands of people vying to get inside. It's not uncommon to wait in the ticket line for three to four hours at Dragon Con. I guess most people pre-order there tickets to WW: Chicago. ![]() Our second surprise came after we picked up our badges and made our way onto the con floor to set up our table. WW ran from Thursday afternoon until Sunday evening, but there were hardly any people setting up in Artist Alley 2 hours before show time on Thursday. Though that evening was only for people with four day passes, apparently not many of them show up. Suffice it to say that we were a little perplexed by this, again because of our experiences at Dragon Con (where people wouldn't think twice about ripping your arm off and beating you with it if it meant they could get onto the exhibitor or dealers room floor an hour early.) WW was just a little too laid back in this manner. Also, we were also a little worried at this point because no one we were supposed to meet at the con (and exhibit with) had showed up yet. It didn't stop us from setting up the table post haste though… ![]() It might not look like much, but making everything in the picture above a reality has been keeping me from updating Branded as regularly as I'd like for the past two months or so. Getting the two magazines written, typeset, and working on the layout and design took a lot more energy that I had anticipated. Not only that, but I spent a lot of time agonizing over the cheapest yet most semi-professional way of filling out our half table space. My friend Daniel at work suggested the collage as a way to catch people's eyes as they walked by and my wife suggested the vintage lunch box to house the buttons we were selling. Then there was the matter of finding and designing cheaper color fliers and business cards. Again, it might not look like much, but it sure did take a lot of trial and error to get that table set up looking as good as it did, and for as cheaply as we did it (I'll never tell.) All in all I was pretty happy with it, happy enough that I actually look like I'm smiling for real in the photo below (a very rare occurrence, at least in photos of me.) ![]() Like the lunch box, practically everything on the collage was culled from vintage materials as it was sort of my theme when creating the table. I tried to get a nice overview of imagery to convey what it is I talk about on the site and in the magazine, and surprisingly it ended up working pretty well. There were quite a few times when people walked by the table and you could see the gears turning in their head as they first dismissed it, and then something stuck and they'd slowly walk back and do a double take. Strangely enough, the pictures of Scott Baio (from Charles in Charge) and the unmasked lizard trooper from V hooked people the most. I think I'm actually going to leave the bulk of my con going experiences for another post (or perhaps a podcast, we'll see.) Anyway, like I mentioned above, one of the main reasons we picked WW: Chicago was to get a chance to meet a whole mess of people we'd run into online over the last couple years including Jerzy & Anne Drozd (of Make Like a Tree Comics, Sugary Serials, and Boum Art)… ![]() Mark Rudolph of CV Comics and Sugary Serials (pictured in the middle, in between Jerzy and Anne)… ![]() Chet Lucero of Storm Corps and Sugary Serials… ![]() Diana Nock (of Sugary Serials, not to mention some great work up at Jinxville), and Barry Gregory of Ka-Blam digital printing (pictured behind both Diana and Jerzy's quizzical head.) ![]() Here's a shot of the Ka-Blam booth for completeness' sake. ![]() I'm getting a typing cramp, so I think I'm going to end it here. Hopefully I'll be able to force myself to do a part 2 (or a podcast) tomorrow… Category: general -- posted at: 10:49 PM Comments[3] |
Tue, 17 June 2008 ![]() Well, I've been mentioning it a bit here and there for going on a month, but I feel a little more comfortable making a more official announcement now. One of the reasons I've been sort of sparse on posts and column updates recently is that I've been working feverishly on expanding Branded in the 80s a bit with a print component. Basically I'm trying to put together a small (literally) magazine that’s pretty much in the same vein as the site. I have no idea what kind of publishing schedule I'm going to try and keep (quarterly sounds about right though we shall see), but the 1st issue is in the can and back from the printers. I'm going to test the waters by taking Branded on the road for the shortest release tour in history, making only one stop this year at Wizard World Chicago. Ever since high school I've been itching to work on some sort of project that would end with a print component, and I'm finally getting off my butt to do it. This first issue of Branded in the 80s magazine is a bit small both in page count (clocking in at around 20 pages) and stature (it's about 5.5" x 7", manga sized), but considering I only gave myself 2 weeks to work on it I'm actually a little surprised it got done at all. The issue contains four articles, most of which are culled from material on the site (I haven't figured out whether or not I'm going to pursue the webcomics or an exclusive content model yet), though I've expanded on all of them to try and give them more of a 'magazine article' feel. The tone of this first magazine is more or less an introduction to Branded in the 80s and is mostly intended for sale at the convention (it'll also include a CD insert of a handful of the Branded podcasts I did way back when.) I'm also taking a second micro-magazine to Wizard World, an eight-page issue that'll hopefully act as a stepping stone to the longer magazine and has an exclusive article (wow that sounds pretentious) on Choose Your Own Adventure style books. I'll be honest, I have no idea if this is a crazy idea or not, but I'm excited about it and it's been a huge challenge creatively, and I've really dug taking a crash course in layout & design. I think the first issue could be much better, but hopefully that'll be something I can work on in the future if I decide to put together some more issues. Anyway, for all of those reading who might be attending WW:Chicago, I'll be at the show the whole weekend, June 26th-29th and will be in the Artist Alley area at table 4914 (yeah, I'll be in the back near the freight docks, huzzah!) Also, part of the reason the wife and I decided to go to WW:Chicago this year is to meet up with a bunch of the Sugary Serials creators who will also be exhibiting at the convention. Our table is going to be part of a row which will include Barry Gregory of Ka-Blam printing and Indy Planet comics (who is also the publisher of the Sugary Serials project), Jerzy Drozd (of MLaT Comics, the Art & Story Podcast, and a creator and the editor of the Sugary Serials anthology), Mark Rudolph (of CV Comics, the Art & Story Podcast, as well as creating or co-creating a bunch of the Sugary Serials comics), Chet Lucero (who I’ll be sharing a table with and is the creator of the webcomic Storm Corps as well as the Dreamform Defenders for the Sugary Serials anthology), and Diana Nock (who has some great comics up at her website Jinxville.com and is the creator of the Sugary Serials comic Imaginary Friends Forever.) I've done my best these past two months getting a bunch of stuff ready for the table at the con, and in addition to the two magazines, I'll also have Branded in the 80s buttons… ![]() If you can't make it to WW:Chicago, but would like to help support the Branded in the 80s project, you can order a print copy from the Indy Planet store by clicking on the cover below. The book is $3, and all orders from the store will not include the CD insert (which shouldn't be a big deal as the podcasts are all free and available for download here, click the banner in the right hand sidebar.) We'll see how the sales at the con go, but I'm assuming that I'll also have copies of the micro-magazine left, as well as buttons. If I do, I'll update after the con, and if anyone wants to get one of either you can drop me an e-mail (at the link to the left.) ![]() I'll be going on vacation before the con, so this will probably be the last update until after the show. P.S. the quote at the bottom of the cover is real, but also sort of an absurdest joke on my part. I thought it would be fun to use a pull quote for the book, but unfortunately the only legitimate quote for Branded was a very silly bit from the Guardian (U.K. paper) which overestimated the rarity of my sticker collection. I don't know, I think it's funny. See you all after Wizard World... ![]() Category: Branded in the 80s Magazine -- posted at: 11:29 PM Comments[5] |
Tue, 17 June 2008 ![]() What's this?!? Another Branded in the 80s podcast? Well, no, not exactly (though I love using the above header...) I recently took some time out to record a show with my wife and Jerzy Drozd (of MLaT Comics, Art & Story Podcast, and Sugary Serials editor and creator) about the upcoming Wizard World Chicgo appearance we're all going to make. Basically we dig into the expectations, hopes, and fears we're going to have at the show as well as some thoughts on what it's like being an attendee versus being an exhibitor. So if you are interested in hearing the soothing sounds of my voice (sarcasm folks) or are interested in listening to us chat about comic conventions, go on over to Sugary Serials and give it a listen (or click the picture below, it's episode 17 of the Saturday Supercast.) ![]() You can also right click and download the show from this link. I also pop up on this past Monday's Art & Story Alive, episode 18 (the sister podcast to Art & Story geared more towards furthering the conversation of the craft of comics art as well as encouraging listener participation), though only for a bit. The topic was long form comics, how they work online, how to approach character and world construction and how they differ from short form comics (mainly strips, but also single issues and such.) We also get into the concept of using photo reference to different degrees and whether this counts as cheating art-wise (if you're curious on my opinion on this topic, I wrote about my struggles with it back in 2006.) You can get the episode by right clicking and downloading it here. Lastly, and also on the podcast news front, Branded in the 80s was discussed on episode 105 of the Paunch Stevenson Show. Greg and Rob take a little bit of time talking about the TV Guide and Peel Here columns as well as getting lost in my backwards site navigation a bit (just kidding guys, though I totally see your point on needing a "Next Page" navigation link at the bottom of the blogplane.) You can get to the episode here. Category: podcasts -- posted at: 11:31 AM Comments[2] |
Tue, 17 June 2008 Have I ever mentioned that I'm a nut for 80s cartoons on DVD? Yeah, okay just checking. Anyway, it was announced today (well, announced sounds so sure, lets say that it was "put on the schedule") by Warner Brothers that Season 1, Vol. 1 of the Silverhawks cartoon will be released on DVD October 14th! The suggester Retail is listed at $44.98 (which I'm sure will be busted down at places like Amazon for aroun $38 or so when it goes pre-sale), which seems a little steep, but then again Warner Brothers are also the geniuses who released the Thundercats sets priced at $65 (for half a season.) Haven't these companies learned from the mistakes Rhino Home Video made with the Sunbow properties? Why haven't they taken a cue from BCI (who, in my humble opinion, are putting out some of the best packaged and priced sets)? There's been some bootlegs of the Silverhawks show floating around on Amazon and eBay, but I'm glad to see it's finally getting an official release. It's been like 20 years since I've sat down and watched an episode of the show so I'm not sure how well it holds up, but I have to say that when it was on I was an addict. I'd rush home from school, plop down in front of the TV and sing along with the theme song (loudly if no one was around.) Category: Cartoons -- posted at: 9:25 AM Comments[0] |
Thu, 12 June 2008 ![]() While sharing Shana Bilbrey's sticker collection last week I realized that we had a little bit of crossover in our collections, namely a set of Halmark Heathcliff stickers. I figured I might as well post mine, as well as my page of stickers from another famous orange feline today. These birthday themed Heathcliff stickers came out in 1983, about a year before I ever took notice of the overbearing bully of a cat. My first introduction to the character came with the 1984 DIC cartoon Heathcliff and the Cadillac Cats, and honestly, I was way more interested in the Cadillac Cats half of the cartoon. Looking back at the cartoon, I think it's partly because I like Three Stooges-esque aspect to the trio of cats (Hector, Wordsworth, and Mungo) that followed Riff-Raff around, but more importantly they had that swell red and white Cadillac, which could transform into other vehicles. I guess the Cadillac Cats were just a bit more dynamic than the Heathcliff shorts, enough to keep my interest at least. ![]() Anyway, I did have a couple of those paperback-sized Heathcliff collections that I picked up through either the Troll school book club or one of the various book fairs we had in elementary school, but beyond that my heart really belonged to another tiger striped orange cat, the one and only Garfield… ![]() Though the above stickers have a 1978 copyright date on them (and that's the date they're typically sold under on eBay) I believe these were probably released around 1982 or '83 as the big lug has taken on most of his trademarked characteristics, leaving behind the much larger more realistic appearance that he had in '78 (here's an example from the 1st Garfield strip.) Without a doubt, Garfield was my entry point into the concept of comic art. When I first seriously took up a pencil and paper to try my hand at drawing when I was 12 years old, I turned to copying from Garfield strips (which later morphed into an odd obsession with drawing the cast of characters from the Tiny Tunes cartoon.) What I think it kind of fitting in an odd parallel continuity sort of way is that when the Garfield and Friends cartoon came on the air, I had a very similar reaction to as I did for the Heathcliff cartoon. I was way more into the U.S. Acres shorts, though I did enjoy the Garfield bits as well. In doing a little research today I discovered that U.S. Acres wasn't created for the cartoon, but in fact started as a daily strip by Davis (though whether or not he was only ghosting on the art and writing duties by that time is a question), though it only lasted for a few years before it was canceled. Having never read it I can't say much about its quality, but apparently Bill Watterson called it an abomination and an insult to the reader's intelligence. Crazy. Well, it looks like another slim week around here, and it'll probably be this way for the next few weeks. I'll be leaving to go on vacation next weekend, and then the weekend after that is the big Wizard World Chicago appearance. I'm probably going to have a post about that and another Peel Here before I go, but we shall see… Category: Peel Here Volume 7 -- posted at: 1:33 PM Comments[4] |
Fri, 6 June 2008
Category: Peel Here Volume 7 -- posted at: 3:00 PM Comments[9] |
Fri, 30 May 2008 ![]() Well, though I'm a few days late on the actual anniversary, I thought in honor of Return of the Jedi's 25th I'd post some of the sticker cards that were released by Topps back in 1983. There were actually two sets of ROTJ cards and stickers, and from what I can tell these are from the 1st set… ROTJ is such a weird beast for me when compared to the other two flicks. Being born a month or so after the release of the first film, and only being 3 when Empire came out sort of negated me from really having the feeling that I got a chance to experience them first hand. When Jedi came out though, I was 6 and doing my best to play catch up with the lore and merchandising of the first two films (I had an army of figures by that time.) When Jedi hit it seemed like the biggest event ever (at least in my insular little world) with all of the toys and product tie-ins. All of a sudden my entire room was covered in one movie's merchandise, from bed sheets and posters to all of the toiletries in the bathroom (I was washing my hair with Chewbacca shampoo, washing my body with a bar of Luke Skywalker soap, and brushing my teeth with an Ewok tooth brush.) ![]() Later on this film in particular became my favorite in the series because it was the installment I got a chance to see the least often (my parents bought copies of the first two on VHS) proving the whole absence makes the heart grow fonder concept. It never occurred to me how different a good portion of this film felt in relation to the other two, what with the obvious child-friendly aspect to the Ewoks, to the multiple singing and dancing scenes. Heck, even though I’m more of an Empire guy these days, I still can't help but love a lot of aspects to this film, more than anything else the inclusion of the Mon Calamari race and characters. I'm a pretty big Admiral Ackbar fan truth be told, though besides my leaning towards everything squid-like, I couldn't tell you why. I think I only had a handful of these stickers growing up; I remember a series of off-color puffy stickers much more vividly. I think Topps did a pretty good job of capturing the majority of the 'good characters' in these stickers. On the other hand, they really dropped the ball on including any of the Imperial characters, namely Vader, the Emperor or the Royal Guard. I haven't seen the stickers from the second series of ROTJ cards, so maybe these characters are covered there. Actually now that I'm thinking about it, I guess there really are a lot of characters missing considering the size of this sticker sub set (at 33 cards.) Why give the Max Rebo Band three separate stickers and then neglect to include one of the Rancor? Oh well. ![]() I've got my Admiral Ackbar sticker, so I'm happy right now. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Anyway, work has been kicking my butt this week, so I think I'm going to cut this one short here. Hopefully I'll be back early next week with another TV Guide post as well as another installment of Peel Here. Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 1:41 PM Comments[2] |
Fri, 30 May 2008 I finally got a chance this past weekend to see five guys that have had the most influence over my sense of humor and worldly outlook, the Kids in the Hall. My mom introduced me to KITH right around the time they really got going with their show on HBO back in 1990, which just happened to coincide with a lot of changes in my life. I just turned 12 and was leaving the southeast (having spent my life to that point in central Florida) to move up north (and getting to see snow for the first time), not to mention all the rigmarole that comes with moving up into middle school and becoming a teenager. Up until that point my reference for comedy didn't stray much past John Candy, Tom Hanks, and the Amazing Spider-Ham (with a dash of MAD and Cracked magazines.) I totally missed out on Monty Python up until then, and my exposure to the classic SNL skits was limited by the crappy heavily edited rerun specials that would air late at night on the weekends, so I didn't really have all that much exposure to sketch comedy. Well, that's not true per-se, I did watch more than my share of You Can't Do That on Television and Out of Control on Nickelodeon. Anyway, pointless story short, I love the Kids in the Hall and I finally got a chance to see them live at the Cobb Energy Center in Atlanta on 5/24/2008…
Category: general -- posted at: 9:56 AM Comments[0] |
Mon, 26 May 2008 ![]() Apparently I really started perking up and paying attention to the new fall schedule sometime in 1982 because this is the first issue of TV Guide that I've flipped through where I recognize and remember watching most of the shows previewed. I guess it kind of makes sense in a strange way. I just turned five, started kindergarten, and was probably very aware of my nightly impending bedtime, and thus was more prone to arguing so that I could stay up and, I don't know, watch Knight Rider or something. '82 was also the year that I missed out on a ton of Saturday morning cartoon time as my Dad decided that it would be good for me to get outside and meet new kids, so he enrolled me in the local soccer league (which he co-coached.) ![]() When I first starting taking a close look at these TV guides I was figuring that there'd be a ton of crazy ads with way out of date prices (either insanely expensive appliances or insanely cheap food items), but for the most part everything has been about the same as it is now (at least for what would qualify for the equivalent by today's standards.) That VCR above though is exactly what I was hoping to see. Granted the video revolution was still in its infancy and no where near the peak it would reach in the mid 90s, but seriously, was $600 ever a good 'on-sale' price for a piece of hardware like a VCR? It was normally $900. In 1982 dollars! I think that's like 1/10th what my parents paid for their Mazda 626 around that time. I mean, doing the whole automobile divided by electronics equation for today's standard, well, I think… Wait, no, I think that computes (scratching my head and doing the little calculator mine in the air)… Yup, I guess you could evenly divide about 10 decent sized HD TVs into one Volkswagen Rabbit. Damn! Still though, I can't bring myself to buy an HD TV so I guess if I were in my parents shoes back in '82 I also would have waited until about 1987 to get our first VCR as well. Going by those theoretical calculations, I should be joining the HD movement sometime in the next decade or so. I was glad there was a different Vivran ad in this issue as well. It makes a nice sister ad to the one I posted a few weeks ago. The main difference is the hilarity. I know when I screw up at work because I'm too tired to count money, I want my boss to give me the equivalent of a low level legal narcotic to keep me going (okay Vivran isn't really anything near a narcotic, but take enough of them and I'm sure it'll feel a lot like taking some speed.) Besides, the ad makes me laugh when I shift the situation in my head to another profession, like a rough and tumble news helicopter pilot ("I destroyed three News11 copters and killed 2 traffic correspondents before my dispatcher gave me some little yellow pills that kept me in the air and flying for hours…") or a daycare worker ("I wiped twenty kids runny noses with the same tissue before I realized that the first kid had the chicken pox. Thank god my supervisor had some Vivran Stimulant Tablets handy because it was my turn to walk the kids to the bus today…") ![]() Like I mentioned above, in getting to the show previews in this issue I'm finally feeling a little like I’m on more recognizable ground. Take that first 2-page spread featuring Joanie Love Chachi, the 9 to 5 sitcom spin-off, TJ Hooker and Cagney and Lacey. Though I haven't watched many episodes of any of these shows (with the possible exception of TJ Hooker which I have some garbled, yet vivid memories of), I've been well aware of them all since they debuted. I guess my threshold for remembering pop culture starts at 5 years-old. I guess this is also the beginning of a comfortable time-frame in which these actors and actresses would go on to stay (more of less) in the public eye. I mean TJ Hooker is Heather Locklear's beginning of a very long love affair with network television as she'd go on to star in no less than 4 more long running shows (yeah, I'm including LAX as it went to a partial season run, but c'mon, Melrose Place, Spin City and Dynasty all in one career?) Heck, while I'm at it I might as well point to Shatner as well. This would be his second big hurrah after Star Trek. I wish I could say the same thing for Adrian Zmed, but this was more of his last hurrah after his turns in Bachelor Party and Grease 2. He sure does encompass that early 80s hunk look very well (not to mention giving Locklear's feathered hair a run for it’s money.) There's also Scott Baio in his post Happy Days, yet pre-Charles in Charge glory with Joanie Loves Chachi (which I'm all of a sudden dying to see after taking a gander at the opening credits, shudder.) Of course, then there's Silver Spoons, my hands down favorite 80's kid-centric sitcom (with Punky Brewster and Diff'rent Strokes coming in at a tie in second place.) If there was one person I wanted to be like growing up it was Rickey Schroder, and if I could have two wishes I would have wanted his house. Rickey was basically a live action version of Richie Rich, though he was a little more frugal (having come from a slightly broken home.) Looking back though I think I was more influenced by Joel Higgins' performance as Edward Stratton III, who suffered from the worst case of arrested development ever. That's who I basically am these days, though without the family fortune (inherited from a grandfather who invented the inner tube.) Add to this the awesome Erin Grey (I never made the Buck Rogers connection as a kid oddly enough), and great guest stars like Jason Bateman and Alfonzo Riberio and you had the perfect kid sitcom. I was surprised to see Rock Hudson in the Devlin Connection preview, as I didn't realize he was still acting at this point. I heard his name bandied about by my parents a lot when I was young, but I've never really gotten a chance to watch any of his movies, so he's sort of a name without a face to me. There's also a preview for Ripley's Believe It or Not, which the perennially scary Jack Palance lent his presence and amazing voice to. Rounding out the group above is a preview for the show Voyagers!, which I had never heard of. From what I gather after watching the intro, it's basically the same type of show as Quantum Leap, only with an adventurer and a kid sidekick righting historical wrongs throughout all of history. It's weird that I missed it though, because it looks like a show that would be right up my alley, and I see that it's on DVD, so I might have to check out and see if Netflix carries it. ![]() If you remember back a few posts ago I made a little fuss over another preview, which starred Pricilla Presley, Burgess Meredith and a Chimp (which actually turned out not to be a fictional show, but rather an animal variety show.) Well, if only I'd waited a little bit I'd have seen that Burgess Meredith took another whack at a sitcom starring along side a bunch of animals (and Sally Struthers, who is actually the true star of the show), and even though it's no Every Which Way but Loose spin-off (instead it was an All in the Family spin-off), I'm sure it was still enjoyable. We also get a preview of a show that really seemed to hit the 80s on the head, at least fashion wise (like the Zmed), Square Pegs. Like Locklear, it was the beginning of a long career in television and film for Sarah Jessica Parker, and coincidentally was just released on DVD this past week. As a side note, has anyone ever seen a more sexually suggestive design for a television special ad than that one starring Sylvester Stallone ever? Holy crap, he's starring as his own penis in that mock up. Weird. ![]() There's an interesting little ad for Madame's Place, a show with a puppet that I have a hard time keeping separate from that crazy Genesis (or was it Phil Collins solo) video with all the weird looking puppets. Here's a bit of Madame from youtube. I guess this was Corey Feldman's shot at stardom between the Bad News Bears sitcom and flicks like the Goonies. Always glad to see one of the Coreys pop up. On the page opposite the Madame ad, there is an interesting advert for a science special hosted by Peter Graves and presented by the fine folks at Atari. Probably the weirdest ad I've seen so far in any of these TV Guides was the small one above called Beefeaters Delight! From what I can gather the ad is for entire sides of hanging beef at amazing prices, but what I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around is the idea that it's being presented to the general public instead of in another more industry-centric fashion. I mean, I realize there are a ton of hunters out there that kill, keep and eat entire deer carcasses, but seriously, who invests in an entire half cow? I mean, that's why we have supermarkets right? I do have to say that the insert advertising 5lbs of hotdogs or Bacon for $.99 a pound is mighty tempting. I wonder what that would work out to in 2008 dollars? Again, because the majority of these TV Guides came out of the Los Angeles area there is a smattering of ads for the Z Channel (as well as the listings in the guide itself.) I thought I'd take a second to point to the wonderful documentary on Z channel again, as well as the trailer for the doc… There was also an ad for the Miss Piggy Show special that aired in '82. Here's a clip via youtube… ![]() Unfortunately there weren't as many Saturday Morning Cartoon ads in this issue, just the one above (which is almost identical to the version that ran in comic books at the time.) As I mentioned above, I think I was being forced to 'take a break' from SMC's at the time to play soccer on the weekends (the strongest piece of evidence is that besides the Looney Tunes I don't recognize any of the shows in the above ad, and I'm only partially familiar with the line-up in the '82 ABC ad as well, never having seen the Mork & Mindy, Laverne & Shirley, or Little Rascals cartoons.) The Meatballs & Spaghetti cartoon looks pretty weird and is both a little bit of a holdover from the 70s family as a traveling band sort of show, as well as being kind of progressive in terms of the MTV generation and coming before shows like Kidd Video or that Wolfman Jack cartoon. It wasn't until recently that I discovered all of the very odd sitcom to cartoon spin-offs of the late 70s and early 80s like the Gilligan's Planet cartoon (or the Mork and Mindy/Laverne and Shirley cartoons mentioned above), which featured out favorite castaways building a spaceship and landing on a distant planet, again getting lost/stuck. I was also surprised by the Pandamonium cartoon, which has a very odd mixture of anthropomorphized animal comedy and action (in the main characters battles with Montragor master of evil.) There were also some shows that weren't quite up my alley, at least not at the time, like Gavilan (starring Robert Urich post Vega$ and pre Spenser for Hire), or the weird TV spin-off of the 7 Brides for 7 Brothers play and film starring MacGyver himself, Richard Dean Anderson, as well as Peter Horton (who would become a household name in my family later on for his turn on 30 Something), and a young, cute-as-a-button River Phoenix. Speaking of household names, probably my mother's favorite show of the 80s was St. Elsewhere. Between having a stellar cast (including Howie Mandel, Ed Beagley Jr., Denzel Washington, David Morse, Mark Harmon, G.W. Bailey, Stephen Furst, Ronny Cox, Helen Hunt, and William Daniels just to name a few) and the intense plot lines (Mark Harmon's character contracting AIDS was our family's 'who shot JR'), it quickly became a must watch series. ![]() Joining Silver spoons and St. Elsewhere were another couple of family favorites, Family Ties and Cheers (though I saw more episodes of Cheers in syndication later on as I think it was on past my bedtime.) Next to the Cosby Show, I think Family Ties was the biggest show for me in the 80s and Michael J. Fox is certainly up there as one of my favorite actors from my youth. If I wanted to be Rickey Schroeder, than I wanted to be best friends with Fox. I thought it was pretty weird seeing Michael Dudikoff in the Star of the Family preview. I have a hard time not thinking of him as a second rate action star as I watched the American Ninja films religiously. It's weird when he pops up in comedies like the above sitcom or Bachelor Party (hmm, another connection to the Zmed.) Same goes for Ron Glass, who stars as Felix in the fourth incarnation of the Odd Couple (after the play, film, and first sitcom.) I have to admit that I'm more familiar with Glass from his turn as Reverend Book in Firefly than his time on Barney Miller. We also have the second attempt to launch the Powers of Matthew Star show. Apparently Peter Barton had a pyrotechnics accident the year prior which caused the fledgling show to shut down while he recovered. I wonder if this was the show that helped to typecast Louis Gosset Jr. as the grizzled older mentor character, which he would go on to play throughout his career (in films like Iron Eagle or the Punisher?) ![]() 1982 also saw the introduction of a show that I've always considered as one part of a trio of action shows that feature a vehicle as the main focal point (and to an extent character) of the series, Knight Rider. The other two are Airwolf (doing for helicopters what Knight Rider did for Trans Ams) and Street Hawk (ditto for motorcycles.) I watched the living heck out of KR growing up. I had the electronic toy and action figure set and would endlessly debate the episodes with friends well into high school. In the context of this TV Guide Fall Preview issue, it really does seem like 1982 was a stellar year for William Daniels (with this and St. Elsewhere beginning; 2 long running shows.) I still can't believe that the show is being reconceived for modern audiences though (I missed the pilot movie, and from what I hear thankfully.) Well, I didn't get this up last week like I'd hoped, but I do plan on doubling up this week. There's a possibility that I might get to the 1979 issue (as I finally found a cheap copy on eBay), but I might just plow on ahead to 1983. We shall see. Category: 80s TV Guide Fall Preview Issues -- posted at: 3:45 PM Comments[5] |
Thu, 22 May 2008
**Update** The 7 episode Richie Rich/Scooby Doo set is in fact 7 collections of shorts. There are 21 RR shorts in the set, and 21 Scooby Doo (without much of the gang, but including Scrappy) shorts. With that in mind there should be another 2 volumes of DVDs eventually (I guess hinging on this set selling well.) I just picked my copy up today and I can't wait to get home and watch some of these again after 27 years... Category: Cartoons -- posted at: 9:55 AM Comments[3] |
Tue, 20 May 2008 Peel Here #71, Q: Where does a Bigfoot sit when he stays at your place? A: Anywhere he wants. Ugg... ![]() For this week's edition of Peel Here I thought I'd break out my collection of sticker cards from the 1987 Topps Harry and the Hendersons card set. When this flick hit theaters I think I was just about the perfect age (10 years-old) for a goofy Bigfoot movie like this; any older and I probably would have been caught up in the smarmy mockery and 'growing up' that comes with the passage into middle school. That next year I distinctly remember giving up Weird Al and the Fresh Prince for Metallica and Megadeth, trading in my roller skates for a skateboard, and Chef Boyardee Mini Raviolis for the more regular and respectable adult size Raviolis. In fact, I think 1987 was one of the last summers where I really got a full dose of fun silly 80s movies as the Monster Squad, *Batteries Not Included, Big Shots, and Garbage Pail Kids were also hitting theaters at the same time. ![]() As far as HatH goes, I've always loved the film and feel that it has aged pretty well considering. I think a lot of this has to do with the cast including one of my favorite actors from the 80s, John Lithgow (who starred in Buckaroo Banzai, the Manhattan Project, and The World According to Garp just to name a few of my favorites from the decade.) Along side Lithgow were Don Ameche (who was enjoying quite the renaissance in his career at the time, along with Jessica Tandy, Hume Cronyn, and Wilford Brimley), David Suchet (best known as playing the titular role in Agatha Christie's Poirot), and the awesome Kevin Peter Hall as Harry (who I know best as the guy inside the Predator suit as well as starring on Misfits of Science.) Looking back I think the amazing job on the practical special effects is what really keeps my interest in the film all these years later. I can only imagine that this would be tackled as a totally CGI cartoon affair if done today. ![]() As far as this sticker card subset goes, I have to admit that I didn't expect there to be any stickers that DIDN'T feature Harry. At least the designers took the time to work in pretty much every memorable character, and most of the memorable moments from the film. I also kind of dig the leafy background they went with. ![]() I did come across one bit of surprising info while doing a little bit of research for this post. There was a Harry and the Hendersons TV sitcom, which aired from 1991-1993 with a total of 72 episodes. I'll be honest, though I'm pretty much a pop culture nerd, and I spent a good time on my butt watching TV in the early 90s, I don't remember a single thing about this show. Maybe I blocked it out or something, I have no idea. I certainly didn't realize that the property got that much mileage, and with no cartoon spin-off or toys either. Here are the opening credits (from Youtube, and in German.) ![]() I should be back later this week with another Vintage TV Guide installment as well as another update to the complete 80s cartoons on DVD list (and hopefully the last for awhile.) Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 12:58 PM Comments[2] |
Fri, 16 May 2008
Normally this would irk me a bit as I'm not a fan of single disc releases, but these are that bad considering each one has 11 episodes (vol. 6 has ten) and they're modestly priced at about $6 a disc. That's about $20 for the equivalent of a 33-episode set, not bad. My main gripe about these DVDs are that the episodes are presented wildly out of order, though like most 80s action cartoons there is little to no continuity so I'm sure the episode order doesn’t matter all that much. Also, even though it's cool that there are 11 episodes per disc, I'd be willing to bet this has hampered their quality a bit. Oh well. Category: Cartoons -- posted at: 12:55 PM Comments[2] |
Thu, 15 May 2008
Category: 80s TV Guide Fall Preview Issues -- posted at: 3:24 PM Comments[4] |
Wed, 14 May 2008 ![]() For today's post I thought I'd dip a little later into the 80s for a look at a weird little sticker card sub-set from the 1988 Topps Growing Pains cards. I say weird because even though I know Kirk Cameron was pretty damn big in his day, but I can think of at least ten other sitcoms at the time that seemed much more popular and more 'worthy' of a Topps card set. I mean Family Ties, the Cosby Show, Roseanne, Full House, and Perfect Strangers all seem like better candidates (and a few years later there would be a T.G.I.F. card set featuring some of these shows though sadly there were no included stickers.) I don't know, sometimes I wonder what the guys at these card companies like Topps were thinking when they decided on some of the properties they chased after. As far as TV shows having card series go there were some obvious choices (ALF and Mork & Mindy come to mind) and some weird ones (Welcome Back Kotter and Dallas for instance), and I would place Growing Pains in the latter category. ![]() Because I was such a cheapskate while compiling my collection of 80s stickers (particularly with this set) I didn't fight to hard with other eBayers for a complete set, so as you can see above I'm missing the #6 sticker (which featured Alan Thicke.) I was actually quite surprised with the flow and symmetry in the design of the sticker card set when I finally got a chance to take a look at them. Unlike most Topps sticker sets there was an almost perfect balance of characters vs. the breakout star (in this case Cameron.) Not only does each member of the family get their own sticker, the actors are also acknowledged by name on their own as well. Throw in the group family shot with the final sticker (below), as well as the Whatta Hunk! Cameron (with the come-hither-and-get-laid-by-me-in-this-lei look on his face) and you have a very balanced set. In fact I think the only thing that would have made this set perfect would have been a Boner sticker (I bet you thought I was going to play the Leo DiCaprio card didn’t you?) ![]() For some reason I decided not to scan the puzzle poster backs to the cards with this set because I think the missing Alan Thicke sticker was actually quite important to the picture. Instead we'll just have to settle for the 'What your completed puzzle should look like...' card. Besides, the picture has already been repeated twice and I doubt there are any of you out there chomping at the bit to rush out to Kinko's with the scanned art to print on a poster sized sheet of paper (or are you, and if so why?) You know, now that I'm looking more closely at the family couch scene, I'm a little uncomfortable. Is it just me or does it seem a little inappropriate for Tracey Gold to be sitting on Alan Thicke's lap at her age? I was never a really big fan of the show to tell the truth, though I did watch my fair share of episodes. I was more of a Candace Cameron fan myself (yes I admit that I watched the heck out of Full House.) Anyway, I should be back one more time this week with another installment of the Vintage TV Guide series… Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 11:54 AM Comments[4] |
Mon, 12 May 2008
While doing this I remembered that I actually found a new SMC ad from the 80s (which browsing through junk comics a couple months ago), so I thought I'd go ahead and post it here… Category: Saturday Morning Cartoon Ads -- posted at: 1:02 PM Comments[3] |
Fri, 9 May 2008
Category: 80s TV Guide Fall Preview Issues -- posted at: 10:35 AM Comments[5] |
Tue, 6 May 2008 ![]() Before I jump into this week's Peel Here I wanted to take a second to say that I'm making a little head way on the Branded in the 80s print edition/magazine front. For two days I was able to hold the finished product in my hand, though sadly because of annoying circumstances I had to send the entire batch of magazines back to the printer to be fixed. The light at the end of the tunnel (at least for my own poor nerves) is that I think I did the best job I was able to with the time I had, and even though it's not exactly what I want the magazine to be, it's a very exciting first step. I can't wait to take these up to Wizard World Chicago at the end of June (where I'll be exhibiting in Artist's Alley.) If nothing else, it's got me jazzed to work on future issues, which has in turn started the creative cogs in my brain turning (though they're heavy and quite sluggish at the moment.) If all goes well, I should have a link up to purchase the book sometime right after WW: Chicago. Lets get on to the meat of today's post though with my almost complete collection of the Topps Back to the Future II sticker cards from 1989. I've been working on this site for just over two years now and I can't believe that I've yet to talk about this film series all that much. I have a very vivid memory of going to see the first film on the 4th of July at a theater near the Altamonte Springs mall near Orlando, Florida back in 1985. It was a packed house and by the time my family made our way into the screening room the only seats left were smack dab in the front row all the way on the right. It was my first experience truly seeing a film that appeared larger than life, and it completely blew me away. After the flick there were fireworks, hotdogs, and plenty of begging my parents to replace the family copper colored Mazda 626 with a De Lorean DMC-12. Though my parents never caved under my pressure (nor did they when I begged them to get a Lamborghini), there was one family in our neighborhood who was jazzed enough to buy one and you can imagine how often I would go out of my way to pass by their house on my way to school. As an 8 year-old who looked up to Michael J. Fox as if he were my own older brother, I took a special pain at the 'To Be Continued' title card at the end of the first flick. When was I ever going to see the further adventures of Doc & Marty in their wonderful time machine? The four years until the release of the sequel in 1989 were a special little hell for me, particularly in the 80s world sans the internettubes for news and rumors to tide me over. Unfortunately, by the time it did roll around I was already switching gears (in the fanatic department), becoming a bona fide Bat-a-holic the summer before BTTF2 was released. That didn't stop me from seeing the flick mind you, I was just in a different headspace than when I saw the original. It didn't help that there were some subtle cast changes (Crispen Glover was replaced by Jeffrey Weissman and Claudia Wells was replaced by Elisabeth Shue) and that the flick was playing off of the whole 'actor playing multiple parts' thing that Eddie Murphy was beginning to make a career out of. For some reason that just didn't play well for me the first time around. ![]() The one aspect I seem to remember the most from the BTTF2 release was a promotional tie-in at our local Pizza Hut. They were giving away goofy futuristic sunglasses (in all sorts of wacky shapes and colors) with the purchase of a personal pan pizza (I believe, my memory is a little cloudy on this.) My pair were yellow and pink and featured weird triangular frames. As far as these sticker cards go, they aren't bad though they're a little too over-produced for my liking. For some reason the designers of these stickers omitted the die-cut feature which was so prominent in Topps sticker card fare up to this point, and were in full blown advertising mode, what with each sticker featuring a giant logo with the title of the flick. I'm missing card #5 from the set, and for once Jeff Allender's House of Checklists has let me down as far as determining whose mug is on that sticker. Otherwise, I'm a tad disappointed that there weren't more characters featured (a future/old Biff pairing would have been nice), but at least the designers didn't eschew Doc completely in favor of Marty. ![]() There are also a couple nice shots of the De Lorean, both a practical image (directly above) and a painting (sticker card #1.) ![]() As far as the puzzle on the back of the stickers goes, it didn't hurt all that much to be missing #5 as it was a bottom corner piece and it doesn't interrupt the flow of the painting all that much. ![]() Anyway, I should be back this week with another vintage issue of the TV Guide Fall Previews, most likely from 1982. Also, I'd like to put a shout out for a list I put together of all the 80s cartoons available on official DVD releases in the US. Not only is this functioning as a checklist for releases, but it's also a way you can help support Branded in the 80s if you so desire. By clicking on any of the titles (which will take you to that cartoon's Amazon.com listing) and then making any purchases, a percentage of the purchase will bounce back to me here, which I'll use to fund the site. No pressure, just wanted to let everyone know that it's there. So until next time, make sure you don't mack on your mom if you find yourself traveling through time… Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 2:00 PM Comments[1] |
Thu, 1 May 2008 I guess if I'm going to do a 10+ week series of these TV Guide Fall Preview issues from the 80s, I'm gonna have to slap together some sort of banner. Feels weird staring off a post all wordy like this. Anyhoo. *Update* As you can see the banner is done. I was thinking again about the dates on the lot of vintage issues I picked up a while ago, and like most wonderings I have concerning stuff on the site, I always seems to come back to that time travel concept from Quantum Leap where Sam can only leap around in his own timeline. Last week for instance, I didn't have a whole lot of specific memories about the shows (or whatnot) in the preview issue because I was only four years-old at the time, spending most of my waking hours in front of cartoons or Tonka trucks. But I kept thinking about it and I decided that this series of posts wouldn't feel complete until I found the issues from '77-'80, so I jumped on eBay and picked up a cheap copy of the 1980 Fall Preview issue, (and am currently bidding on the others I'll need.) Last up in these first five scans we also have a K-Mart ad for one heck of a crazy audio set-up. It's a five-in-one system with a stereo, turn table, dual cassette decks, 8-Track player, and even comes with two microphones, speakers and a nice looking set of headphones. Crazy. I think I could actually use something like this now, well if it had a usb port that is. It's make for one heck of a podcasting unit with built in vintage vintage audio media capabilities.
Category: 80s TV Guide Fall Preview Issues -- posted at: 10:02 AM Comments[5] |
Tue, 29 April 2008
Something that I don't have nearly enough of in my vintage sticker collection is food premiums. If stickers fit the definition of ephemera, that stickers which were only available as prizes or extras with either prepackaged or fast food should (in my mind) be a great example of ultra rare ephemera. I've talked about this before, but the idea that full sheets of stickers from 20-odd years ago are still floating around on the secondary market is just amazing to me considering they were designed to be peeled and stuck to things. For me, the disposability of a sticker premium is just tripled. Not only are these stickers blatant advertising from the product purchased, but also it's not something chosen by the owner. Who buys a box of cereal just to get some stickers? Okay, as I typed that last sentence I realized that there are actually a lot of kids (and grown-ups) who might do just that, but even so aside from sticking them in a sticker book or on the side of a bureau or shelf, who is keeping these mint on either their original backing or in the cellophane they came wrapped in? Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 10:32 AM Comments[8] |
Thu, 24 April 2008 ![]() About a year or so ago I stumbled upon something pretty cool on eBay that I thought would be fun to share on Branded in the 80s, namely an almost complete run of TV Guide Fall Preview issues for the eighties (1981-1990.) I'd still like to locate the issues from 77-80, but instead of putting this off any longer, I thought I'd go ahead and start posting the highlights from these issues. My family was TV Guide-oholics while I was growing up. First off we didn't have a television with a remote until I was in high school, and we didn't have a remote controlled cable box until a couple years before that. Up until then, all throughout the 80s we had those old cable boxes that had a slide lever that you pushed to the right to get into the higher numbered channels and to the left to get to the lower numbered channels. It was one of those types of boxes that you family's drunk acquaintances would swear could pick up the pay channels for free if you just stuck a playing card between the lever and the receptor inside. Ours were typically connected to the TV by an extra long cord that was always stretched across the living room so that my dad could toggle through the channels while he lay on the couch. Anyway, because channel surfing was a little more archaic and because none of us cared for the one channel that would flash programming for all the other channels (what's become the TV Guide channel oddly enough), we lived by our weekly TV guide digest. On Satudays my mom would come home with the weekly groceries and I'd always dive into the bags looking for our copy of the guide so that I could flip straight to the 'Movies' section to see what was playing on the pay cable channels. We only ever subscribed to HBO and I was always dying to see what was going to be on that week, not to mention lamenting what I couldn't see on Showtime or Cinemax. Sure, we also received the HBO guide by mail once a month, but my parents usually swiped it up and it would soon disappear never to be found again. I would also roughly plan out my Saturday morning, trying to come up with the best way to navigate through the cartoons on the various channels, though ultimately I would always end up sitting in front of the TV and switching between toons, mid-show. Of course, the best issue only came out once a year, the Fall Preview edition which showcased all of the new programming on the main three networks. As I mentioned above, the earliest issue in the lot I picked up was the 1981 edition. I was only four at the time, so I doubt I flipped though this particular issue, and with a few exceptions, I don't remember many of the new shows that were offered up. I still can't help but smile while looking though it though. Actually, another interesting aspect of the TV Guide is that it's geared towards local markets, so every week there should be at least 100 to 200 different editions depending on where you live in the country. Though most of the up front and cable material is the same, there are some interesting bits of local flair in the middle. Most of the issues in the stack I purchased were from California, and in the small region that was actually lucky enough to pick up Channel Z (there's a great documentary on Z Channel that gives background on the whole phenomenon), so it's kind of a kick to see what was playing through out part of the 80s. Anyway, without further to do, here are a bunch of thumbnail that link to larger scans from the issue… ![]() I think it's weird that the artist who mocked up the cover chose to put a ring on what I assume is a lady's hand drawing back the right side of the curtains. I don't know why I find it weird, but I do. Though there were plenty of cigarette and liquor ads, the one that caught my eye first which a whopping 6-page Sears spread featuring all sorts of appliances and electronics. From $400 dollar monstrously sized microwave ovens (though they allude could cook a whole turkey, though I wouldn't want to eat it) and surprisingly modern-priced washer and dryer units, to pricey TVs (with Super Chromix picture tubes) and $800 Betamax players. Interesting side note on the Super Chromix picture tubes, I distinctly remember putting my face up so close to the TV glass that I could only see the weird green, blue, red color bars. I always wondered how it could look so good from far away and so simple up close. Ah the wonders of science and technology, and stupid kids smudging their grubby faces on TV screens… ![]() I didn't scan in every TV show preview page, but I tried to snag the ones with some recognizable faces, like the above show King's Crossing with a young Linda Hamilton. The one show out of this entire book that I wish I had paid attention to at the time was the show The Powers of Matthew Star. It sounds like an 80s version of Smallville, except the dude had a kickass spear! ![]() I also tried to scan in shows that have since become pop culture icons, like Simon and Simon above. Believe it or not, I have never seen a single episode of that show. My wife is ashamed of me. I also thought it was kind of weird how openly liquor used to be advertised with soda brands. The above Bacardi ad is only one of like three in this issue alone that has major brand sodas in them, advertising the beauty of a mixed drink. Does this ever happen anymore? Of course I was all over the Saturday Morning cartoon ads in the TV Guides I bought. These make wonderful companion pieces to the ads I've already posted from the various comics books of the 80s. This one above fills in the 1981 ABC gap in my original post. There was also a tiny ad for one of the ABC Weekend Special cartoons which I vaguely remember catching every once in awhile… Category: 80s TV Guide Fall Preview Issues -- posted at: 4:08 PM Comments[5] |
Mon, 21 April 2008 ![]() Wow, times flies around here when I'm not posting on a more regular basis. I'm more or less out of the weeds in terms of being busy (crossing my fingers and toes), so hopefully I'll get back on track with a weekly or twice weekly schedule sometime soon. But no one wants to hear about my time management issues… In other Branded in the 80s news, if you've been following my Twitter feed at all (in the left-hand menu bar toward the bottom, you've probably guess that I've been working on a site related project for the last month or so. Actually, it's more of an experiment. I've been working on a print edition of the website, a magazine of sorts that I'm going to debut this year at Wizard World Chicago. The first issue is going to be a 20 page pocket-sized magazine containing 4 articles and some other fun stuff. In addition, I'll also have an 8 page Micro Magazine in a similar format to the pocket-sized book, which will contain one article, but will a have a cheaper price point. Basically, the magazine is an experiment to see if I can generate a little bit of money to go towards upkeep on the site (hosting, fees, etc.) as well as generating a little bit of petty cash to put towards vintage content materials (stuff to share on the site.) Both books are currently off to the printers, and if everything goes according to plan (I've drugged B.A. for the flight, registered my artist alley table for Wizard World, packed plenty of excess cats so ALF can having something to snack on during the trip up, etc.) I'll have them in hand within the next few weeks. I'm going to take the initial batch with me to the con, but I'm sure I'll have plenty of copies left over to sell on the site. Again, this is an experiment. If all goes smoothly then I've been thinking of putting out a larger book (both in page count and physical dimensions) quarterly or so. We shall see. Getting back to Peel Here though, this week I thought I'd throw up something that just barely makes the cutoff in terms of 80s nostalgia. I've always been a firm believer in the idea that a decade isn't defined necessarily by the actual dates (e.g. 1980-1989) but by the pop culture fads and such. When you stop and think about it the first few years of most decades tend to feel more in place with the previous one. When I think about the 60s, I picture hippies, the later Beatles, the Munsters, peace signs and Vietnam, all of which is more or less '65 and up. The initial explosion of the Beatles, the Mods, Kennedy, etc., that all feels more in line with the late 50s to me. Same with the 80s. The arcade explosion, Atari's, knee-high socks, stripped ringer T-shirts with iron-ons, Star Wars, this all feels more like the 70s, while He-Man, G.I. Joe, Nintendo's, the surf and skate craze, Punky Brewster, etc, all feels like the 80s to me. Going along with this, the first couple of years during the 90s feel a lot like the 80s. The end of hair-metal and pop R&B, Batman Returns, and the Beetlejuice cartoon, this is all residual 80s pop culture in my opinion. I know this seems like I'm going overboard a little on proof-of-concept, but I'm a stickler for details and when I see the '1990' date on the stickers below it puts me off a little. It's like when I hear people mentioning Tiny Tunes, the Animaniacs, and Captain Planet as 80s cartoons, when they are both the 90s and feel like it as well. Beetlejuice on the other hand feels, at least to me, more like the 80s as it debuted in '89 and is tied to the titular film of the same name (which is very 80s.) Anyway, that's enough of my anal decade squabbling; let's get onto the stickers. These are part of a subset of trading cards that were issue by Dart FlipCards in 1990. Thought he card set was very similar to the standard Topps fare of the 80s, they were a little more in-tune with the 90s card sets in that they were printed on cleaner, nicer cardstock, and the stickers that were included were a little more like the Panini sticker book stickers (they're printed on thin flimsy paper and are a tad smaller than the card set itself.) The big draw of this set is that all of the stickers featured glow-in-the-dark artwork… ![]() Though I haven't seen an episode of the cartoon since 1993 or so, I remember loving it to pieces because of its then new mixture of CGI and traditional animation (something I'm all that keen on anymore, at least not in general.) I also loved the way the series turned the movie's concept on its head by making Lydia and Beetlejuice friends, again something that I probably wouldn’t care as much today. I think this stems from my love of the BJ character and the fact that even though he might seem like the main character in the movie, he's only in like 17 minutes of footage while the rest is taken up primarily by Alec Baldwin, Geena Davis, Catherine O'Hara and Jeffrey Jones. It was really cool to get a chance to explore the neitherworld and watch Beetlejuice go nuts. As far as this sticker set goes, I was a little under-whelmed in that it doesn't really feature the cast of characters from the cartoon all that well. There is a lot of miscellaneous imagery on the stickers, which though cool, isn't quite what I'd like. I guess I was hoping for another Lydia sticker or two, or one featuring the Monster Across the Street. Heck there are three skeleton themed stickers on this first bit above, any of those could have been Jacques LaLean ![]() As far as the glow-in-the-dark gimmick, some work better than others. Sticker #9 above is pretty cool in that the blob of 'gitd' at the bottom of the picture is in the outline of two people (no doubt getting the wits scarred out of them by that monster.) On the other hand, in sticker #14 the blob of 'gitd', though obviously a monster, is sort of lost in all the black in the background, and even when glowing is still sort of non-descript. ![]() At the end of the day, after reading about these stickers online I was hoping for more like #20, basic character poses. I did my best to try and scan one of these while it was all charged and glowing, but it didn't quite turn out as I hoped… ![]() …but I think you can sort of get the point. Hopefully I'll be back this week with something other than a late Peel Here to post, but we shall see… Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 2:12 PM Comments[3] |
Mon, 7 April 2008 ![]() Well, if anyone is wondering why the posts have slowed down so much lately, there is a reason, and it's far from something bad. In fact, it's pretty cool, but I don't want to spill the beans completely until I have more solid confirmation (though I haven't been keeping it all that secret...) Regardless, I thought I'd take a second and throw up a quick edition of Peel Here to keep the fires stoked and burning around here. This week I'm going to share my last two sets of Colorforms Lazer Blazers hologram stickers that I have in my collection. First up I have one of my Holy Grail items in my quest to find vintage stickers, the 1983 Dungeons & Dragons LB set. I was pretty hot to get these because they have proven to be the hardest to find, and they do occasionally pop up on eBay, the most expensive Lazer Blazers by far. I've been in two furious bidding wars, and both times the other guy was willing to pay far more than I could or would, so I sort of stooped to a kind of low to get these. Actually, I never really purchased the stickers themselves, but instead, I contacted one of the sellers who listed them, and I offered to pay for a decent sized scan instead. Not one of my finer moments, but I feel justified in that I now at least have them to share… ![]() Like most of the D&D merchandising in the 80s, these have nothing to do with the Saturday morning cartoon, and everything to do with a the actual role playing game (though a couple of these characters do make an appearance in the show.) I've talked about him before, but I had a weird crush on the Warduke character (who is in the package art as well as on the bottom left sticker) as a kid as I had the toy and I always thought he looked pretty darn evil. Up next we have one of the three more girl-oriented Lazer Blazer sets, the 1983 Barbie stickers… ![]() For once, the prismatic rainbow color effect of the hologram technology is put to an almost perfect use. Besides these two packages (and the nine I put up in past columns), I know of at least four more sets and a binder that were produced between 1983 and 1985. There was a My Little Pony set, which also probably looked pretty good in holo-colors, a Beastman themed Masters of the Universe set, a set of generic (non-branded) unicorns, and a set of rainbows. Though I've already posted these, here are the rest of the ones in my collection, so that in the future I can refer to this one Lazer Blazers post. Enjoy! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 3:01 PM Comments[1] |
Wed, 26 March 2008 ![]() As a quick aside before I plunge into the Peel Here column proper I'd like to say that I finally bit the bullet and picked up a rather expensive copy of the very first Choose Your Own Adventure style book. It's called Sugarcane Island and Edward Packard wrote it in 1969. As the story goes he came up with the idea while thinking of bedtime stories for his three children; he found probably one of the most useful ways of taking advantage of the 2nd person point of view in writing (at least in my humble opinion), which is a very tricky way of putting the reader into the shoes of a story's protagonist. This way he could involve his children in the stories more, handing over the controls to them so to speak and giving them opportunities to decide how the story would play out. Anyway, it was a pesky book to try and find. I couldn't locate a non-branded copy to save my life, so I had to settle for the version that was printed under the Which Way banner in '78 (it was also published again under the Choose Your Own Adventure series in the 80s, but it was modified and updated, and I really wanted the original.) Picking Sugarcane Island up means that I can finally start working on showcasing a bunch of these decision-style books in a new column on the site. So, with that little bit of news out of the way, lets move on to the meat of today's post, my meager collection of ALF stickers… ![]() I don't think I really have to give any background on the character, as he was practically a rock star in the late 80s for a number of years. The 1986 ALF sitcom and franchise was pretty darn big spawning four seasons of the live action show, a couple of cartoon series, at least one popular plush doll, and a bevy of merchandise including stickers. Though I watched the live action show (to the blank stares and amazement of my parents) and the first cartoon series quite a bit, I really didn't get into any of the ancillary merchandising, stickers included. I did manage to procure some of the more common stuff on eBay like the puffy stickers above (which were released by Russ in 1987.) ![]() There were also a couple of series of ALF cards issued by Topps in 1987-88, and a series called the U.S. of ALF (issued by Zoot in 1987.) The below sticker cards are from the second Topps ALF series in 1988… ![]() I freaking love his skinny tie in sticker #27. There’s also a nice bit of airbrushed artwork in this next set… ![]() And of course there was the obligatory puzzle poster that came along with the set… ![]() I really need to go back and watch the TV series, as I haven't seen it since it aired. I still find incredible that we managed to get four seasons of a show with a guy in a little furry suit as the main character, on prime time TV no less. There's no way that would work in today's TV environment, not unless ALF was invited to take part in the Surreal Life or something (and I'd love to see the logistics of that happening…) Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 2:06 PM Comments[2] |
Tue, 18 March 2008 ![]() This week's Peel Here is brought to you by insane side effects to prescribed medications. Have you ever heard of nightmares as being a side effect to medication? I hadn't, yet for the last week I've had the weirdest dreamscapes that I can't help but describe as nightmares (if only because they wrecked my much needed sleepy time.) It's right there on the pill bottle as well, nightmares. Anyway… I've been meaning to get to the following set of stickers for awhile, but for some reason kept putting it off, so this week I'm going to rectify the situation by presenting the complete Cyndi Lauper sticker card collection from Topps (1985.) ![]() I wouldn't say I was a huge Lauper fan growing up, but it sure was hard to escape her image and music in my household. My sister had the She's So Unusual record on regular rotation and thanks to her odd cross promotion with the WWF and her songs in the Goonies flick I seemed to always be running into that bright orange and blonde hair. It also didn't hurt that I was addicted to the "We Are the World" song and video like most everybody else in the early 80s. A little later on my Mom became a huge fan after the release of the "I Drove All Night" single, which she played more often than my sister played the SSU album. Heck, I'd also be the first to admit that I started wearing multicolored jelly bracelets around that time as well. I'm not a slave to fashion, but I am impressionable from time to time. ![]() Though the design on the Michael Jackson and Menudo sticker cards seemed to scream the 80s, I'd have to say that this set takes the cake in terms of being patently iconic of the decade. As if Cyndi wasn't vibrant and in your face enough as it is, these background sticker design is insane. Though we do get an appearance by Captain Lou Albano (mainstay of her videos and possible nemesis to her wrestling persona –I just don't remember), I was kind of bummed by how static the set seems in terms of imagery. Granted, I realize the set is supposed to be Lauper-centric but I think there needed to be a little more variation, possibly by including the pictures from her album cover or something. ![]() ![]() The other thing I just thought of is how much Lauper reminds me of Diz Aster from the Nickelodeon show Out of Control (she was the one with the shrill aaaeeeeoooo aaaeeeeooo cry.) Well, actually, I think I have that backwards as Aster was probably a play on Cyndi Lauper. Anyway, this set of sticker cards also breaks convention a little by offering one huge 15-card puzzle poster instead of two smaller ones like the Menudo and Michael Jackson sets… ![]() It's kind of weird now that I think back on it. I have a weird thing with ages and stuff, and it's hard to believe that Cyndi Lauper is just about my Mom's age. I don't know why it seems weird, but I guess I always thought she was around my sister's age because I aquated her to my sister since she was the 'fan'. Anyhoo... Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 3:22 PM Comments[3] |
Fri, 7 March 2008 ![]() I think I'm going to take a little break from Garbage Pail Kids here on Peel Here for a bit, if only to get the sticker columns flowing again. I still have to scan in four or so sets of sticker cards and I keep pushing it off when I'm at home. On the other hand, I still have plenty of other stickers that I scanned a good bit ago, and I kind of want to switch gears for awhile. For today I thought I'd bust out with my collection of Rambo stickers, which were part of a subset of Topps cards that came out in conjunction with the second flick, First Blood, Part 2 (probably the silliest name for a movie ever.) Though the film's title is pretty weak, its star certainly is not. If I had to hazard a guess, I'd say that at the time First Blood, Part 2 hit theaters Sly Stallone was probably hitting the height of his popularity, as were the 80s action flicks he helped usher into the decade. For my money this is about as far as an action flick could go, crazy believability-wise, without side stepping into fantasy, sci-fi, or becoming a parody. Don't get me wrong, it's not really all that believable, but it's not quite Commando either (also don't get me wrong redux, I love both flicks, in particular Commando.) I wasn't allowed to watch the flick when it first came out, I was still a couple years away from completely breaking my parents of their justified urge to try and shield my 8 year-old eyes from uber violence. This didn't stop me, and an entire generation of young boys, from idolizing the film, character and man by lusting after lunchboxes, T-Shirts, branded school supplies, and the coup de grace, the plastic replica hunting knife (with realistic hollowed out handle containing fake matches, string, and other odds and ends, and capped off with a glass compass. That knife was my generation's Red Rider BB Gun. If I remember correctly the knife also came packaged with a glow-in-the-dark replica of his little jade pendant necklace. Anyway, this subset of cards was released in 1985 by Topps and contained 22 stickers, the backs of which made the standard puzzle poster… ![]() As far as Topps sticker subsets go, this is probably one of the loudest in terms of design and color choices. Other than the fact that there were already a ton of sets that featured Red borders, I'm not sure why they didn't choose to go with that, or a nice hunter green. The yellow just sort of hurts my eyes. I also think the die-cut on the stickers is kind of boring, and since it encompasses the movie title and card number anyway, it's sort of pointless. As far as the choices for screen captures go, I don't blame the designers in pretty much completely sticking to Sly in fun action poses, though I'll be honest, I was kind of hoping that there would have been a torture rack sticker (as inappropriate as it may have been.) I guess I'll just have to live with the skinny dip into the muddy leach water instead (in this next set of stickers…) ![]() One thing I found kind of odd about the pictures on the stickers was that there seemed to be an awful lot of captures where Stallone is reaching or jumping up with arms outstretched. There's a fourth one in the next set below. Just seems like a red flag would have been raised in the design process. I wonder how many kids opened up a pack of cards and were supremely bummed by getting a Richard Crenna or a Julia Nickson sticker? ![]() If nothing else, I'm glad they included the two pieces of poster art (above) as stickers. I've always been a fan of this, if only because poster art used to be so awesome in the 80s what with all the paintings and stuff. Beats the heck out of all the bad Photoshop jobs we see these days. ![]() ![]() Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 2:45 PM Comments[0] |
Thu, 6 March 2008 I thought I'd take a moment and talk about my current nostalgia obsession. I've been spending the last three or four months scouring my local used bookstores for all the Choose You Own Adventure style books that I can find. I only had a handful growing up, most of which were books from the actual Choose Your Own Adventure series, but there were a couple others that I read and re-read a few times including a Marvel Super Heroes Gamebook featuring Wolverine, and one of the Which Way series of books starring Batman. Though I loved both of these latter books because of the characters, I always sort of thought of them as CYOA knock offs because they didn’t have that branding. Well, when I first started buying up all of the CYOA books I could find I was getting a little discouraged because I wasn't finding all that many. In fact, without resorting to eBay I only managed to find about 20 (there were something like a hundred and fifty or so I think), and another 5 that my friend has had since he was a kid. One of the reasons that I wanted to track these books down was to get some more material for the site as I’m getting towards the end of my sticker collection (I have a good 6 months worth of material left, but I've sort of tapped that reservoir), and 25 books just isn't going to cut it. Then I remembered the Batman and Wolverine books and it got me thinking about what other CYOA style paperbacks were available in the 80s. Let me go on record as saying that there were a ton, and I've been buying them left and right. I was sort of blown away when I started taking stock of the books that are stacking up on my shelves. I've found no less than 20 different series that range in branding from generic/original (like CYOA, Find Your Fate, Which Way, Your Amazing Adventures, and Wizards, Warriors and You) to a ton of popular 80s properties (including Marvel, DC, D&D, G.I. Joe, Transformers, Thundercats, Jem, Indiana Jones, James Bond, Star Trek, and even Blackstone the magician.) I've even discovered the world of paperback gamebooks (including stuff like Lone Wolf, Fighting Fantasy, and Sagard), which are basically one player role playing games that act a lot like CYOA style books except you use dice and make decisions based on what weapons and spells your character has amassed. What's kind of crazy is that I'm currently about a hundred or so paperbacks in to a collection that I think might just be gargantuan. The good news is that I should have plenty to talk about when I finally tackle how I want to approach these books. The bad news is that since there are so darned many of them I'm not sure where to start. I guess there are worse problems to have though. Anyway, I thought I'd share a few cover scans to give an idea of the kinds of books I've found and what's going to come up eventually on Branded… First up we have an entry in the Twist-a-Plot series (I don't have the date handy as I type this.) I was completely unaware of these books growing up and though I've been scouring the kids section of used bookstores for years I never paid any attention to these because they're kind of light on the page count. I have a couple that are around the CYOA standard (which is around 110 pages), but most seem to be around 50 to 60. Next we have book one in the Lazer Tag series published by TSR (again, don't have the book in front of me so the date escapes me.) TSR, the publishers of the Dungeons and Dragons roleplaying game system, seems to be the second largest publisher of CYOA style books (next to Bantam who were responsible for CYOA, the Time Machine series, as well as the Be An Interplanetary Spy series.) Not only did they publish about 50 novels in their D&D branded CYOA series called Endless Quest, they were also responsible for a series of Marvel Super Hero books and the above Lazer Tag books. Last up today is one the rarer series (well at least in suburban Georgia), the Heart Quest books, which were also published by TSR and took place in the D&D universe. These were aimed at girls and I believe are more in the vein of romances (which ought to be a trip to read.) They even have die-cut covers, so that when you open the book you get a full version of the picture on the cover. Classy. Anyway, I thought I'd throw these up on the site since I haven't made an update in awhile. Hopefully I'll get back on schedule with more Peel Here columns next week. Category: Awesomely Overdue Books -- posted at: 1:56 PM Comments[4] |
Wed, 13 February 2008 I thought I'd take a second to note the passing of Steve Gerber. Initially I wasn't going to write about this as I feel that I'm the last person in the world that is qualified to comment on either Gerber or his work. I didn't know him personally (or even impersonally for that matter) and I'm only beginning to become familiar with his work in cartoons (and though I've owned Essential editions of both Howard the Duck and Man-Thing for a while, I've only read through a little.) I guess what I'm getting at is that if there's anything at all to take away from my post, it's that if you get a chance check out some of his comics or cartoons and maybe it'll lead you to some stuff that you really enjoy (either his own or through the people he worked with.) Category: general -- posted at: 3:35 PM Comments[0] |
Fri, 8 February 2008 ![]() I'm finally back with another late edition of Peel Here. At this rate I'll be sharing my Garbage Pail Kids collection for three months instead of the planned two. Anyway, I wanted to give a quick shout out to Devlin from Bizarro Wuxtry in Athens, GA who not only has a great shop full of comics and a million odds and ends, but also the only place I've seen in Georgia that has GPK singles for sale. I managed to pick up all the cards I've been missing from series 8-11, as well as the rare triplets from series 4 and a few series 2 stickers as well. This week I'm slapping up my complete collection of 6th series cards, which were released by Topps in 1986. This was at the height of my GPK collecting phase, which I think is kind of strange considering that it apparently only lasted for about a year. All of the sets I remember collecting came out in 1986, so either I have a very skewed memory of my time collecting, or there is some truth to the idea that time seems to pass differently when we're kids. If you'd of asked me how long I spent collecting GPKs before I started taking a close look at when they were released, I would have sworn it was at least three years. Actually, I've spent more time collecting the All New Series cards (which have been coming out since around 2001 or so) which just seems weird. Anyway, there are 44 different paintings in this set (for a total of 88 sticker cards) and once again John Pound cranked out most of them (28.) As before, Tom Bunk shared some of the load with 7 paintings, and newcomer James Warhola pitched in 9 pieces. Bunk handed over the art duties on the backs of the cards to Jay Lynch, who did 18 Bazooka Joe comics parodies starring GPK characters from the first few series. ![]() For some reason this set comes off a little more toned down in my opinion (from the slightly more vicious 5th series) as the concepts seem to range from more or less normal (GPKs as vacuum cleaners, slinky dolls, and flags) to the more bizarre yet non-violent (GPKs with trees growing out of them, made completely from garbage, or painting themselves by number.) Over all it’s a decent entry into the series, though not terribly interesting. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I thought it was kind of interesting that we'd start to see some of the amazingly overused visual jokes, which would really begin to hamper the series as it went on, particularly in the last couple of sets as well as all of the new series. An example of this is on stickers 235 a&b (the stitches/scar.) I think later on we start to see a lot of repeated imagery (cracks, scars, pimples, band-aids, snot, puke, poop, and pee) partly because of a lawsuit Topps settled with the makers of Cabbage Patch Kids, and partly to define the image of what GPKs would become. Unfortunately it gets to a point where a lot of these visual cues don't make much sense in the context of the card concepts. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() In this set we also get to see some of the concepts from earlier sets being reused or at least reworked. In the page above cards 246 a&b are very similar to the Potty Scotty card from the 1st series. Similarly on the next page there is a variation on one of the most iconic GPKs, Atom Bomb (from the first series) in the form of Dyna Mike and Newly Dead Ed (cards 250 a&b.) Again, this is something we'll see more and more as the series goes on. ![]() ![]() Of all the cards in this set though, my favorite as a kid had to be 248 a&b. Not only did it directly reference GPKs, it also takes pains to break the 4th wall playing around with the concept of sticker cards. I've always loved this idea when I see it in marketing and advertising (I seem to remember packages of cereal that looked like they were torn open, but it was just the artwork ont he package.) Heck you see stuff like this in comic books all the time (where a page looks like it's been torn away revealing the page behind it.) I think this sort of thing pops up in the Ambush Bug comics, though I can't remember for sure right now (I'd have to dig into my comic boxes in storage.) ![]() Anyway, next time on Peel Here, GPK series 7! Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 3:59 PM Comments[0] |
Fri, 25 January 2008
Category: Peel Here Volume 6 -- posted at: 3:10 PM Comments[2] |
Thu, 24 January 2008 ![]() So for the time being this post will finish off my collection of Hostess comic ads. Like I've mentioned before, I think there are still about 30 or 40 more ads that I haven't been able to find yet, so that'll probably be a project I work on over this coming year. Right now though, lets take a look at the last 10 DC ads in what I like to call the Essential DC Hostess comic ads Vol. 3, Part 2: Cupcakes 1975-1980. Shazam in the Cupcake Caper 1975 ![]() Wow, that is one straightforward Hostess ad. Bam, cupcakes are missing. Bam, Shazam restates the obvious. Bam, he stops the brilliant Cupcake Caper. Bam. BAM BAM BAM. If nothing else, I'm beginning to find some possible context clues for why the last Shazam ad was written so (to me) oddly. So does young Billy Batson work at the TV station? If so that would go a long way to explaining why he was kidnapped in that ad. Superman Saves the Earth 1976 ![]() Man I never realized that Superman sat in on such universe plotting council meetings. Thank god he eats cupcakes and not Spam or the whole planet might have gone up in a puff of smoke that fateful day. Also, I love how in comics alien worlds are often delineated by the lack of any sort of atmosphere, having only a vast blanket of stars in the sky. As silly as it seems, it really is a nice artistic short cut. Batman in the Muse 1977 ![]() Besides the fact that Batman and Robin are stepping out attending a concert in full bat-suit glory, I really dig this ad. In particular I love the switch that the Muse makes from internal monologue to exclaiming his love for Hostess cupcakes mid thought. I wonder when in '77 this ad was written as there's a nod to Elvis in it. Not a good year for the king. Batman and Robin in Birds of a Feather 1977 ![]() You know, I would have loved to see this ad end with Batman and Robin watching as Pigeon Person's plan crumbled when she realized that even an army of pigeons can't pick up a mountain… Batman in Sable Lady 1977 ![]() "That's giving it to her on the old chinchilla…" Um, okay. Holy inappropriate Batman! Wonder Woman in the Maltese Cupcake 1977 ![]() I have absolutely no idea what just happened in that comic. Seriously. Superman in the Big Fall 1978 ![]() Wow, that was total overkill Clark! You know, you could have just stopped the elevator from falling and gently let it come to rest at the bottom of the elevator shaft. There was no call in flying it out of a building, and in assuming that it would burst through the roof without hurting the occupants who were so blissfully unaware of the danger because they had their mouths full of chocolate-y goodness. Sheesh, that seems more in line for a Hulk Hostess ad… Wonder Woman vs. the Cheetah 1978 ![]() Well that was kind of a mean trick to play on the cats. Lure your way in and then slap them around instead of the master. I guess it was bad form to have a cheesecake cat-fight in a 70s cupcake ad. Batman in Someone is Kidnapping the Great Chefs of Gotham City 1979 ![]() …and this is why America doesn't give in to terrorist's ransom demands. I wonder if the networks would ever stoop to this level of advertising on TV. I'd love to see a series of 24 one-minute Hostess ads starring Jack Bauer. In the last minute it would be revealed that Twinkie the kid wasn't a terrorist, he was honestly trying to transport three tons of Hostess products overseas in hopes of balancing the world economy or something. I'm going to get cracking on writing those so that I can pitch them if the writer's strike continues. I'll make a mint. Wonder Woman and the Barron 1980 ![]() Wouldn't this ad have been that much cooler if instead of a generic chocolate vampire wannabe called the Baron, Count Chocula was the villain? Man, new idea, advertisement crossovers, like the Secret Wars, but with cartoon advertising icons. Again, another idea that'll make me rich… Category: Essential Hostess Comic Ads of the 80s -- posted at: 2:25 PM Comments[1] |
Fri, 18 January 2008
In the continuation of my two-month long celebration of my Garbage Pail Kids collection I present another complete set of stickers, this time the original 4th series. Well, almost complete set of stickers. When this set first came out there were a few cards that had their names changed in future printings (my assumption being it was for legal reasons as the changes were all of proper names, three of which were almost if not unchanged from the source), which resulted in 4 sets of 'triplets'. I remember freaking out a little when I noticed this as a kid. I guess I was still a little wet behind the ears and hadn't yet realized that there was such a thing as rarity or errors in products. This is actually the second time that Topps tried replacing an already circulated card, as there was a variation on the 2nd series Schizo Fran card (which was turned into Fran Fran, again assuming, but this time for reasons of taste.) So even in the age of the internet I've yet to finally complete my 4th series collection as I'm missing 3 of the four triplets rare cards. While browsing the store I also found a bunch of GPK school folders, which featured artwork from the (to me) extremely mysterious 1st series. In my trading with friends I managed to score a few cards from the 2nd series as well as getting a chance to see the majority of the set, but no one I knew had any 1st series cards (I wouldn't see any for another ten years, not until my first comic book convention.) Anyway, I really wanted the folders, but I only had two dollars and had to choose between the two. I ultimately chose the 4th series packs because it seemed more important to not only have the actual sticker cards, but also to get my hands on some that my friends hadn't seen yet. Anyway, this has been the biggest stumbling block in tracking down the rare triplet cards in this series it just seems way too completist. Actually, now that I'm thinking about it, I seem to remember having a lot of trouble trying to explain the twin concept to my mother when I was younger. I'm sure she was thinking the same thing I am now. Now if I could only understand her mindset when she'd step all over my mint condition comic books and not seem to care… Growing up though I'm more drawn to card number 135 as I've become a huge fan of both Rocky Horror and the idea of grown men (I'm working on the idea that he's older because of all the stubble) in drag, ala Monty Python, et al. Again, as a kid this card was completely lost on me. I think it's truly awesome that the designers and artists were brave enough to do this, to plant ideas in these sets that they knew would go way over the heads of most of the kids buying them. To me this is a sign that they were hoping that kids would come back to these later on and develop a whole new appreciation for them. Heck, if nothing else, it has worked for me. It can also be kind of subtle too, as with card 138. Most kids are going to like this because it has a kick ass alien on it blasting a ray gun into to air. On the other hand it's also a reference to Topps' roots and their Mars Attacks! card set. In the above scan you can see a spot for a missing card. This is where the variation on card number 158b would be. The triplet card is named Crystal Gale. Again, above there should be a triplet for card number 164 (b), which is named Salvadore Dolly.
Category: Peel Here Volume 5 -- posted at: 3:42 PM Comments[5] |
Tue, 15 January 2008
Shazam fights the Minerva Menace 1975 Aquaman Twinkies and Kelp 1976 Batman Twinkieless Gotham City 1976 Wonder Woman Kookie La Moo on Broadway 1977 Green Lantern in Half the People Here 1977 Aquaman in That Dirty Beach 1977 Superman in an Unbeatable Power 1978 Aquaman and the Imperiled Sub 1978 Wonder Woman in Dilemma 1978 Category: Essential Hostess Comic Ads of the 80s -- posted at: 2:14 PM Comments[2] |
Fri, 11 January 2008 ![]() As I mentioned a few posts ago, I thought it would be fun to spend the next couple months concentrating on my collection of Topps Garbage Pail Kids sticker cards for the Peel Here column. Far and away these were my favorite stickers growing up easily edging out scratch and sniff or puffy stickers and I've had a collection going for awhile, so I have plenty to share. I thought it would be fitting to share the set in which I was introduced to the cards back in 1986, which was the 3rd series. I don't think I ever managed to complete a full set of cards growing up, but I came pretty close with the 3rd and 4th series. It wasn't until I first moved in with my girlfriend (now my wife) back in 2001 that I finally managed to score a complete set of the entire 3rd series thanks to the wonder of eBay. Before I get into the set proper, I thought I'd mention that even though these are essentially stickers, as a kid I pretty much never ever peeled them off of their backing. Collecting GPK felt a lot like collecting baseball cards, though I hadn't discovered anything as organized as mylar pages or card boxes (plastic or cardboard) yet. I kept the collection in a few Ziploc bags, one for each series and a couple for my doubles. My adult collector's mind completely reels at the thought of a naïve younger version of my self, bopping around the neighborhood with a Ziploc bag full of stickers. I'm sure all the corners were rounded or bent, and I imagine a little dirty from my handling them all the time. I wouldn't get an anal collector's awakening for a few more years, not until I started collecting comics and I learned the art of bagging and boarding. Anyway, I'd also like to mention that there are a few really great GPK resources out there in interwebnetsland, one of the best being Barren Aaron's Garbage Pail Kids Reference Guide. Aaron has done a pretty exhaustive job cataloging and annotating all of the GPK releases, from tracking down which artists did the cards to the various miss-printings and print run variations. Here's his page on the third series. So, on to the actual stickers. There are 41 separate pieces of artwork in the set (for a total of 82 cards), which also featured a couple different variations on the card backs. There were two different card back puzzles, and 18 different 'Wanted Posters' (which I'll talk about later.) ![]() One of the aspects of GPKs that I love the most is John Pound's great artwork. He was the main artist on the series up until this series, painting the entire 1st and 2nd series sets. On this series he shared the load with fellow GPK artist Tom Bunk (which did all of the artwork for the card backs in the first three sets.) Also, if you are unfamiliar with GPK, all of the cards come in pairs (though later on there would be some triplets), each of which features a different pun-y name (and assigned either an A or B by the number.) John Pound was responsible for these first five pairs, one of which is probably in my top 10 favorite GPKs (Hot Head Harvey and Roy Bot.) Also, all of the cards in the initial run of GPK series in the 80s were numbered consecutively after the last set, so this set starts off where the last left of with card numbers 84 A&B. One of the things that I love about these cards is that I didn't get all of the jokes when I was a kid, so now that I'm older there are a lot of references and gags that I can appreciate now. The first time I realized this was with the Hot Head Harry and Roy Bot cards. I've mentioned before that I really didn't watch any of the Robotech cartoon growing up because it came off as way too soap opera-y and boring, but later on in high school I was addicted to the show. It was then that I had a eureka moment one day, realizing that these GPK stickers weren't just a gag on robots, but that they were modeled off of the Veritech fighters from Robotech (specifically the super armored version.) ![]() As far as the card backs go, like I mentioned above there are a few different variations. There were two sets of puzzle pieces, a handful of checklists, and these Wanted Posters (with art by Tom Bunk, and which were written by Mark Newgarden and Art Spiegelman, yup the Maus Spiegelman.) These Wanted Posters are actually reworked versions of a set of Topps sticker cards from 1975 called Wanted Stickers. All of the art was re-worked by Tom Bunk and the text was beefed up a bit. These sorts of card backs (the Wanted Posters) were always a little weird to me. On the one hand it was cool to see sort of adult versions of GPK-like characters, but the concept of the blank spot to write in a name bugged me. This was always something to look out for when trading, making sure no one had written on the cards (now that I think about it I guess I always had a little bit of the anal collector in me.) ![]() The majority of this next group was done by Tom Bunk (with the exception of 92 A&B which was done by Pound.) Though they are working in very similar styles (no doubt due to the idea of staying On-Model), there are slight differences, little flares that point to one or the other. The biggest difference that I can point to is that Bunk's artwork comes off a little harder, with a little bit more of a hard plastic feel to it whereas Pound's paintings are softer. This is probably getting way too deep into the ideas behind the series and stuff, but I've always felt that Pound was playing off of the Cabbage Patch Kids parody a little more, yet also giving a little more life to the figures. Bunk on the other hand seems to be achieving a more fake hard doll kind of feeling, which in the later series would take over as the dominate model for the characters (so much so that almost every character for awhile featured cracks in their shell, an aspect that I believe was settled on after a lawsuit between Topps and the Cabbage Patch Kids company to differentiate them from each other.) Bunks artwork also tended to be a little sparser, with either a two toned background separated by a gradient shift, or some simple set pieces, while Pound's cards were set in very detail rich environments for the most part. The cards above are also a great example of how varied the GPK sets used to be. None of these concepts feature any blood, poo, pee, snot, or puke, all of which are present on most of the new series cards, and typically combined in every card. Also, only one of the five features any sort of violence, the rest are as varied as varied can be. This is something that would slowly be worked out of the sets as time went on. ![]() ![]() Here's another great example between the two artists with cards 93 (Pound) and 94 (Bunk.) Though it's worked into the concept with Bunk's, you can really see the hardness he brings to the set, while Pounds is much more elastic. Now another aspect to GPKs that I adored as a kid was all of the cards that fit into the horror genre. Beth Death here is an example of the type of card that I loved. ![]() ![]() Sort of going along with that idea are all of the creepy cards as well. Though I suffer from an incredible arachnophobia, I always loved the cards featuring spiders. This set also features Ali Gator who would later make it into the cast of the GPK movie. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() According to Barren Aaron's Reference site, two of the cards above (117 & 118) were worked on by a third artist Mia (whose last name is unknown.) I can certainly see it in the artwork for 117 as it's one of the most off-model cards in the set. Back 8 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() All in all I really love this set (though it's the beginning of the decline in interesting concepts after stellar 1st and 2nd series.) As a kid I ended up getting most of my 3rd series cards through trading as I was relying on my mother and father to pick up the odd pack for me, which was only every so often. There weren’t any stores by me that carried GPKs, something that bugged me the entire time I collected them. Next week I'll be tossing up scans of the almost complete 4th series. Category: Peel Here Volume 5 -- posted at: 3:56 PM Comments[2] |
Fri, 4 January 2008 ![]() Wow, I really have been lax around here for the past two months. I'll tell ya, the holidays really suck all my drive and energy, even when I'm not doing all that much. Anyway, it's a new year, blah blah, and really want to get back to a more regular posting schedule, so I thought I'd dip back into the well a little and throw up some more Hostess comic book ads. I have a handful of ads left (I don't have a complete collection, but I do have another 25 or so left to get to) that I'm going to make my way through over the next week or so and then hopefully I'll build up another modest head of steam to get me going on a more regular posting schedule. I certainly have a backlog of stuff that I'd like to share, including getting back to the Galaxy High Cartoon Commentaries, getting started on the second year of the Peel Here column, as well as getting to some other material that I've been accumulating over the last year. So with that said, lets dive back into the weird world of Hostess Comic ads with the last crop of Marvel ads from my collection. These are all Twinkie-centric and span the years 1979-1981. Spiderman meets June Jitsui 1979 ![]() I have a feeling that some days the writers at the Marvel Bullpen came into work and just didn't have anything to contribute Hostess-gag-wise. This is about as cut and dry as you get, villain intro, kick, kick, toss-a-Twinkie, gloat, and villain foiled. I have to admit that I'm glad to see Spidey carrying a sack full of Twinkies instead of him producing them from some hidden spot on his suit, though I'm deducting creativity points since the sack isn't made out of his webbing. Spiderman in Hotshot on the Block 1979 ![]() All right this is a little more like it. Granted, it's about as thrill packed as the last strip, but at least there are a bunch of bad puns thrown about. It's kind of weird to hear Peter refer to himself not only as a swinger, but as a cookie too. Well it was the 70s. As far as dashing Hot Shot's plan by burdening him with a package of Twinkies, well all I have to say is that I hope Mr. Hot Pants learned his lesson and in the future he'll know that it's perfectly fine villain etiquette to stuff the entire Twinkie package in one's mouth, chewing it up, and pulling the plastic wrapper out later, so that you still pitch some fireballs at an silly hero that thought Twinkies could stop you from taking over the world. I need to write a villain handbook or something… Captain Marvel Defends the Earth 1980 ![]() Wow, I believe this ad wins the title of The Weirdest Cold War Strategy Metaphor Ever. Damnit, let those Kree bastards eat cake! The Human Torch in a Hot Time in the Old Town 1980 ![]() This ad made me chuckle because for once the hero delivered on his pun-y plan. Johnny really does just use the Twinkies as a diversion as he ends up burning down Flame Thrower's laboratory. Of course, I'm not sure exactly how burning down the lab stopped him considering he was just burning down the city in general, but I'll let it slide. I guess I'm just extra glad it wasn't a hollow pun. Mr. Fantastic in the Power of Gold 1980 ![]() Wow, the writers of these ads really should have avoided trying to explain these strips with science. As golden as a Twinkie might appear, it's just not gold. On the other hand, I'm so glad the there was a little social commentary thrown in with the crack about heroes not being able to afford gold in the 70s. I find it funny that Richards found it necessary to stockpile gold back in his heyday of hero-ing though; it really gives him a very Hugh Hefner-like quality. I wonder if he had a super stretchy velvety bath robe that he'd wear while counting his gold? Spiderman in the Rescue 1980 ![]() Is it just me or does the pacing of this strip make it seem like that kid screwed up Spidey's plan to stop those kidnappers with some sweet Twinkie action? Spiderman in the Trap 1980 ![]() Holy crap, that is some Twinie throwing magic Peter just performed. I mean, if he couldn’t get out of that net, how in the hell did he manage to throw a package of Twinkies through it? I'm starting to think that he's acting like a chump on purpose just so he can grease the squeaky wheels of injustice with creamed filling. What a sellout. Captain Marvel in Flea Bargaining 1981 ![]() Flea Bargaining is one of those Hostess strips that almost defies description. It's certainly makes me think that the writer really didn't want to work on Hostess scripts anymore. This is also a great example of how weird it can be to merge established fictional characters with advertising campaigns. There's no reason Captain Marvel shouldn't just blast the giant flea into space or something, but I'd be willing to bet that there was a stipulation of not using violence in the strips (not to mention the idea of working in Hostess products to foil the exploits of the various evildoers.) I think my favorite part of this strip is in the second panel where an angry shop keep is more concerned with turning a profit (or at least getting in a little bargaining time) than helping to stop the giant flea market eating flea. It's so out of place, yet it really helps to ham up the crazy flea market jokes. Weird. The Human Torch in Hot Tempered Triumph! 1981 ![]() You know, stealing cold hard cash from orphans is one thing, but stealing their Twinkies, well that's just plain evil. Evil I tells ya. Iron Man in the Charge of the Rhinos! 1981 ![]() I wonder why the scribe of this comic was pushing Fission so hard? And why giant Rhinos? Granted rhinos are pretty tough, but it still seems like an engineering nightmare to have created them. Category: Essential Hostess Comic Ads of the 80s -- posted at: 2:27 PM Comments[1] |
Fri, 21 December 2007
This is more or less a teaser for what's to come in January and February as I'll be spending those months sharing my collection of 80s Garbage Pail Kids stickers (probably my favorite stickers of all time) in the Peel Here columns. So without further ado, here are a few of the large stickers reprinted from the 1st series of GPK's… Category: Peel Here Volume 5 -- posted at: 1:57 PM Comments[2] |
Thu, 13 December 2007 ![]() I've been gearing up for Christmas. Well kind of. It seems as year after year goes by I become more and more enchanted by Halloween, and less and less enchanted by Christmas. I'd have to say that I'm missing a vital aspect of the holiday, which is maturing a little bit out of the awesome gift receiver and into the awesome gift giver. Of course, when I say this I'm referring to the idea that there should probably be a kid involved in the equation somewhere. My wife and I aren't planning on having and rugrats, and my sister and her husband are still undecided. Since I'm not all that close with my cousins or my wife's family, there aren't any kids to get stuff for. As for the adults in my life, well lets just say I get one of two responses during this season when I ask them what they'd like: "Whatever you get me will be fine…" or the un-enchanting "Eh, I don't really want anything." Compounding this is the fact that most of the adults I know don't read, don't really get into movies or TV, and have hobbies that are either way too expensive (hamm radio equipment), or are sort of uninspiring gift-wise (like buying yarn for the knitters.) This leads me to a practice that I am mostly opposed to which is gift card giving. I'm mainly of the mindset that if you don't know the person well enough that the best idea is a gift card, than you probably shouldn't be exchanging gifts. Of course, there is the familial obligation thing, which leads to much gift card buying. Heck, for the last few years, my wife and I have been deeply entrenched in a gift card battle with her stepbrother and his wife. It started when they got married and that next Christmas gave us a $50 gift card when we had only chipped in for a $25 one for them. The next year the tables turned with us upping the amount and them lowering. And on and on. Funny thing is you think it would even out, but it never does. Anyway, enough complaining chitter chatter. We're here for the sticker goodness, at least until after the holidays when I'll be able to free up some time for digging back into the cartoon commentaries. So what's up this week? Well, since I just found a super cheap copy of Robocop 2 in the dump bin at Wal-Mart, I've sort of been in the mood to share the Topps sticker card subset from their 1990 set of trading cards… ![]() I've always sort of closely identified with the first two Robocop movies because I saw them in the theatre growing up and they were (at the time at least) two of the most disturbing films I'd ever seen. It was around that time that my parents lifted my ban on seeing R-rated films (I think I was about 10 at the time) and it was kind of a novel thing in my circle of friends. Later on, after I became a comic collector and my friends sort of caught up on the R-rated movie watching, we sort of developed a weird cult of fandom for sci-fi/action flicks that also had comic book counterparts, in particular the Alien, Terminator, and Predator movies. For some reason, try as I might, I just couldn't seem to win everyone over on the Robocop films, love them as I did. In retrospect, I find it kind of weird that there was any merchandising off of these films at all because of how adult they were. I mean there was a Marvel comic, a cartoon series, a line of toys (which were cool because they incorporated not only caps, but also removable helmets), scratch and sniff stickers for the first film (I have to assume they smelled like motor oil), and probably lunchboxes though I can't remember for sure. The second film has always felt very hard edged, what with the drug addicted cyborg baddie, the evil little kid, and the extent to which Murphy (Peter Weller) is beaten down. I don't think the director (Irvin Kershner of Empire Strikes Back fame) handled the black comedy aspect quite as well as Paul Verhoeven did in the first (though I'm sure it didn't help that Frank Miller is the credited screenwriter on the second film, and he surely isn't know for his comical writing style.) As far as the stickers in this set go, they're your pretty standard Topps fare. There were 11 in the subset, all of which had a badge like border and a huge logo that sort of distracted from the overall sticker (much like the similar Batman the movie stickers from a couple years earlier.) ![]() I have to say that out of all the possible imagery they could have pulled from I'm glad they focused on Murphy for most of the cards. I just think it would have been even less kid friendly had they stuck in a bunch of the other characters. I'm also glad there was an E.D. 209 sticker as well. I'm not quite sure why, but I've always been fascinated with the chicken walker stylings of both the E.D. 209 and the AT-ST from Star Wars. Like most Topps sticker sets, these also had puzzle poster backs, though the choice of the picture is a little weak considering they already used it as a sticker, and it's not all that interesting to begin with… ![]() ![]() I wonder why there was never a set of Topps Terminator cards and stickers? I mean they did Alien (and the Alien Queen sticker from the Fright Flicks set), Robocop, and there was also that one Predator sticker in the Fright Flicks set as well. Maybe it was a studio property thing… Category: Peel Here Volume 5 -- posted at: 3:22 PM Comments[4] |
Fri, 7 December 2007
So I'm a little in the dark here, what is the deal with the little tags hanging off all of their shirts?
Category: Peel Here Volume 5 -- posted at: 3:55 PM Comments[3] |
Thu, 6 December 2007
Dial: (724) 444-7444 Become a Talkshoe Memeber if you aren't already.
Category: podcasts -- posted at: 1:56 PM Comments[0] |























































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































